Industry groups protested, saying that if the EPA began defining coal
ash as hazardous waste, that decision could backfire — choking off a trade that recycles the material into concrete, and creating even more unwanted ash.
Not exact matches
Today the AP writes: «While the spill of
ash from burned coal contains arsenic and potentially carcinogenic heavy metals, it is not regulated
as hazardous waste.
Designation
as hazardous material would make coal
ash waste — and its storage — subject to more stringent federal regulation.
The Bill already includes an 18 % reduction in the budget of the EPA but the additional measures include a rider preventing the EPA from issuing any regulation on greenhouse gases for the next year, a rider stopping the EPA from bringing in proposed fuel - efficiency standards for all automobiles (which were approved by manufacturers) a refusal to label toxic
ash spill left from coal combustion
as hazardous waste, a rider preventing uranium mining in the Grand Canyon and a prevention on stopping limits on mercury usage.
• A rider that would prevent the EPA from labeling the toxic
ash left over from coal combustion
as hazardous waste — something that would no doubt alarm the people of Kingston, Tenn., buried by a coal -
ash spill in 2008.