Sentences with phrase «ask about the logic»

Debating the merits of betting on preseason NFL, I'm often asked about the logic of betting games when the starters spend most of their time on the sideline.
Never mind ask about the logic of the other side!
Don't ask about the logic of going to a Lebanese restaurant in Brussels — just try it!

Not exact matches

Accordingly, to ask about the truth of theological proposals is in part to raise questions about the «logic» of the types of speech and action that comprise the Christian thing.
Itâ $ ™ s like the crazy logic about homosexuality not being a choice (and Iâ $ ™ m NOT saying it is, Iâ $ ™ m just saying the logic of this particular reasoning is flawedâ $ ¦) Who, they ask, would choose a lifestyle that would get them persecuted, ridiculed and sometimes even killed?
When I asked Assad about her views, she gave me a response that seemed based off a combo of emotion and logic rather than Scripture.
While systematics attends primarily to the Christian story, and recognizes its centrality, it also asks about the truth of its own propositions, and answers to the demand for logic, clarity, and inner coherence.
Does not the same logic demand that we ask, «What is revealed about the Father's nature and love in his resolute determination to slay the son?»
And whereas the rest of the biological sciences can safely hide behind the behaviourist logic that we can never know what another organism, human or otherwise, is consciously experiencing, even asking a question about animal welfare forces us to conclude that we must at least try to find out.
The logic behind this is simpe - the reward centres in our brain (which induce feelings of pleasure), are more active when we talk about ourselves, so by asking a potential partner about themselves you'll activate their reward centres, meaning that they'll associate this positive feeling with chatting to you.
The following are common characteristics of gifted children, although not all will necessarily apply to every gifted child: • Has an extensive and detailed memory, particularly in a specific area of interest • Has advanced vocabulary for his or her age; uses precocious language • Has communication skills advanced for his or her age and is able to express ideas and feelings • Asks intelligent and complex questions • Is able to identify the important characteristics of new concepts and problems • Learns information quickly • Uses logic in arriving at common sense answers • Has a broad base of knowledge; a large quantity of information • Understands abstract ideas and complex concepts • Uses analogical thinking, problem solving, or reasoning • Observes relationships and sees connections • Finds and solves difficult and unusual problems • Understands principles, forms generalizations, and uses them in new situations • Wants to learn and is curious • Works conscientiously and has a high degree of concentration in areas of interest • Understands and uses various symbol systems • Is reflective about learning • Is enraptured by a specific subject • Has reading comprehension skills advanced for his or her age • Has advanced writing abilities for his or her age • Has strong artistic or musical abilities • Concentrates intensely for long periods of time, particularly in a specific area of interest • Is more aware, stimulated, and affected by surroundings • Experiences extreme positive or negative feelings • Experiences a strong physical reaction to emotion • Has a strong affective memory, re-living or re-feeling things long after the triggering event
So many of us in this country wake each morning having to ask essential questions about what «good work» means, what it looks like in a nation driven too often by the short - term, what - ever - it - takes logic of the free - market economy — or more generally in a culture that willingly downplays professional ethics.
«When asked how a mathematician devoted to logic and proof could believe that extraterrestrials were sending him messages, he said, «Because... the ideas I had about supernatural beings came to me the same way that my mathematical ideas did.»»
Second — Specifically about Vaughan Pratt's poster one may ask are his premises, data selection, logic and methods tailored to only find selectively what he maintains «a priori» and discards things not included the «a priori»?
Following that logic, managers of endowments asking themselves a similar question about the social responsibility of their portfolios may not have a different answer.
Behind the scenes, this programmed with a series of questions, there's a logic tree, so depending on what the person's legal problem is, it'll ask a series of questions and those are all vetted with legal aid lawyers, and also ask questions about their income and where they live, which they can answer not, but answering those questions will, at the end of that, I don't know if you followed it out to the end, but it produces a little customized page of, «These are resources you should be looking at.
One question the writers of «legal eduction» studies might ask — perhaps they have, I've never bothered to look — is «what does it tell us about law as a discipline that so many people who claim they're no good at math, sciences, philosophy, logic etc. (and whose transcripts show it), manage to get into law school and then do reasonably well»?
For example, when talking about if — then statements in conditional logic he asks you to think of it in terms of the rules of evidence:
Foreign gays who only came to Canada to marry and then returned to seek a divorce could have major problems if child custody was an issue, and there was little logic in asking Canadian courts to make decisions about children living elsewhere, he said.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z