Not exact matches
Brightman seems to recognize that this is a stretch for him, for when he
asks of himself the same
question after his correspondence with Hartshorne has ceased, Brightman expresses
epistemological diffidence, counterbalanced only by a peculiar attitude of Scriptural faith:
Indeed, even if one begins with broadly
epistemological considerations, as I have done here, one can only avoid
asking and answering the
question wherein the ontic correlate of such a noetic pole consists by a failure to be fully critical in taking account of what one always already presupposes.
Indeed, our
epistemological beliefs are thought to influence the
questions we
ask, the sources of information we place trust in, the certainty of our beliefs, and even academic outcomes (Greene, Sandoval, & Bråten, 2016).
From a methodological and
epistemological viewpoint,
asking «how» a factor causes a trend in some variable would be pointless if the trend itself is in
question.