When
asked about fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S., the study's lead author says «[t] he U.S. can remove them.
Not exact matches
The companies include Chevron Corp., ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips Co., BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Peabody Energy Corp. «The American people deserve answers from the
fossil fuel corporations
about their actions to massively deceive the public in regards to climate science,» Lieu and Welch wrote in a letter to their House colleagues
asking for their support.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to report on how their investment policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern
about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued
fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to
ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related issues.37
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D - RI)
asked Pruitt
about the Oklahoma Attorney General's office lack of response to an open records request, made under state law, for emails between his office and
fossil fuel companies it regulated.
When
asked about global warming, 84 percent of scientists say the earth is getting warmer because of human activity such as burning
fossil fuels, while only 49 percent of the public agrees.
For hurricanes, then, you'd want to
ask what the sea surface temperature, subsurface ocean heat content, and atmospheric water vapor content would have been if, say,
fossil fuel use had been eliminated 100 years ago, and atmospheric CO2 remained at
about 300 ppm.
The companies include Chevron Corp., ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips Co., BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Peabody Energy Corp. «The American people deserve answers from the
fossil fuel corporations
about their actions to massively deceive the public in regards to climate science,» Lieu and Welch wrote in a letter to their House colleagues
asking for their support.
But when we
asked about increasing transparency for the billions of U.S. taxpayer financing Ex-Im allots to
fossil fuel projects, we got the same, tired excuses for the Bank's undying support for dirty, outdated coal technology:
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders
asked the Department of Justice Tuesday to investigate ExxonMobil for sowing doubt
about climate change after the company's own scientists had confirmed and accepted the role of
fossil fuels in global warming.
Recently, a scientist named Jagadish Shukla penned a letter to the White House
asking that
fossil fuel companies be investigated under anti-racketeering laws for funding disinformation campaigns
about global warming (a campaign we know they did and have continued to do).
A day later I
asked her how she felt
about the ocean acidification that the burning of
fossil fuels is causing.
Just
about nothing else would cost so much and do so little, so the bunnies have
asked Eli why Roger and the Breakers are doubling down CO2 capture at the source (
fossil fuel power plants, cement kilns) imposes a cost on the
fossil fuel industry.
The former secretary of state was first
asked a «yes or no» question
about banning the extraction of
fossil fuels from public grounds.
Epstein
asks if everything we know
about fossil fuels could be wrong, and suggests readers should «look at the big picture of
fossil fuels»:
A better question, however, would be to
ask exactly how the questioners came to know the detailed information
about the skeptics» associations with anything related to the
fossil fuel industry.
A reporter
asks about donations from the
fossil fuel industry.
RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I
ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored
fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How
about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?
When we interviewed Tim Toben, of Greenbridge Developments, and
asked him what every TreeHugger could do to make a better, greener world, he suggested that people should «tell the story
about the transformation from a world powered by
fossil fuels to a world powered by renewable energy — in poetry, music, art, dance.
When we interviewed Tim Toben, of Greenbridge Developments, and
asked him what every TreeHugger could do to make a better, greener world, he suggested that people should «tell the story
about the transformation from a world powered by
fossil fuels to
Mr. Tillerson himself has been
asked to testify
about the role of
fossil fuel companies and the government in causing climate change, as part of a lawsuit brought by children alleging their constitutional rights have been violated.