Sentences with phrase «asked less questions»

You may be asked more questions, you may be asked less questions.

I appreciated that I was asking myself less questions, compared to traditional accommodations where we tend to constantly make comparisons: geographical location, price, amenities, etc; things that demand a lot of time.

Not exact matches

Less confident people often can't be present and their best selves if they're constantly asking themselves questions such as: Did I come across as confident?

Vaden says, «When you ask yourself that question, you will find that you immediately feel less pressure to only focus on the urgent things that are pressing today or this week and you instead gain a perspective to start thinking about what you can be doing now to make a positive impact on the future.

In another survey question, the bank asked which brands the participants were more interested in purchasing than before, and which they were less interested in purchasing.

The employee should be offered the opportunity to come back later to collect personal effects and ask questions, but the meeting ends in less than 15 minutes.

One question wireless industry watchers are likely asking themselves today is whether Mobilicity is worth more or less than it was at the start of the week.

Social media monitoring and asking questions in social channels is quick, easy and less expensive than traditional surveys and focus groups.

This will help create an environment where your staff can openly ask questions and share valuable information while making the entire experience less nerve - racking.

«The more questions you ask, the less risk there will be.»

They are less comfortable investing in stocks when they don't fully understand the risk and they tend to ask more questions than men before buying.

Or maybe you have a less conventional interview question you like to ask, like those asked by these company founders and CEOs.

So why do we apparently get less interesting in person (a question asked not only by marketers but also frequently by online daters)?

Those who took to the microphone to ask questions of CEO Thorsten Heins and co. were often complimentary and polite during the meeting's Q&A session, but a few were still looking for an explanation as to the company's latest less - than - stellar quarterly results.

In a blog post, Amit Singhal, senior vice president of Google Search, explained how comparison and filter tools built into Google's «Knowledge Graph» will let users ask questions that don't necessarily have simple answers in a way that feels less like a search and more like a conversation.

This evening, I have sent the following three questions to each of the candidates, and asked that they respond, in 200 words or less for each question, -LSB-...]

(A similar set of questions could be asked, mutatis mutandis, about Jewish involvement with Islam, a religion that also claims, although to a much lesser extent than Christianity, descent from Judaism.)

He is less successful at answering questions that liturgical skeptics are likely to ask.

One major reason that institutions are inherently conservative is that continuing in existing ruts is far easier and less demanding than asking searching questions and allowing ourselves to be reshaped by the answers.

Perhaps the question as to what their church - relationship means is asked less searchingly among us because of the apparent self - evidence of the answer: we are preparing ministerial leadership for the churches.

These questions have not been properly asked, much less properly answered.

(Proverbs 18:2) Let's do less airing of our opinions this year and spend that time reading, asking questions and having conversations.

A similar but less partisan question is the philosophical one asking why it is that...

Those relationships may change, but in the process, you'll be less alone because you'll find others who are asking those honest questions, too.

The question is being asked whether the price for the present pattern is not too high, whether we could not, without losing me many good things in our society, have a freer impulse life, a richer imaginative consciousness, be less alienated from our bodies, be capable of more profound intimacy with a few and more community with many others.

With each question we ask, we learn to depend more upon Him, and less upon ourselves.

I'd ask the same question of so called «christian conservatives» and their view point of how less fortunate folks should be treated.

Other than asking directly while reassuring your husband that you will not think less of him for revealing his true feelings, there is not much insight I can offer with respect to your question.

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.

Second, I'm perplexed because the things that move me to ask questions — disasters like the one in Haiti, religious pluralism, heaven and hell, science, poverty, injustice — don't seem to bother them like they bother me, and I (unfailry) wonder if it's because they are less compassionate or less intelligent than me.

No question about Jesus can be asked with less likelihood of an assured answer, but the question must be asked nevertheless if we would approach an understanding of the meaning of Jesus in the early church.

Apart from the influence of Buddhism, Western process thinkers have hardly asked these questions, much less answered them.

The interviewer asks if this wouldn't make us less than human, which was the question we would have asked, and Vatinno answers: «Becoming less human is not necessarily a negative thing, because it could mean we are less subject to the whims of nature, such as illness or climate extremes.»

But his very posing of the question makes no sense unless he is asking us to give him nothing less than «reasons» to explain how we reason about things when we disagree.

A similar but less partisan question is the philosophical one asking why it is that the ultimate explanatory structure of reality, if such a structure exists and whether or not it is divine, should happen to be just as it is.

In businesses, the more prominently they say they are a «Christian» business, the less they can be trusted not to rip you off — they have the big fish on the truck in hopes it stops you from asking questions and figuring them out.

Clark Pinnock centers the issue even more pointedly as he asks, «How is it that those who take a high view of the Scriptures are known to produce less by way of creative biblical interpretation than those who either bracket the question or treat the text as a human document?»

My friend, who I hadn't seen in years, asked me this question no less than five minutes into our lunch date.

It proved incapable of asking difficult questions about life's meaning in the face of suffering, much less answering them.

The correct question we should ask ourselves is, why do we believe there is a God and when I say we, I mean the general population that does believe, it is also a good question to ask, why do those who do not believe in God, not believe, is their reason for not believing in God any more or less logical then the reason for those who do believe in God.

More (or less) opportunities to ask me questions?

In any case, thoughtful people in these churches where the language of survival has been less urgent — and such thoughtful people are legion — are asking questions of meaning which show that they too are «bothered» and have to look at «what's ahead.»

One is reminded of the boy Jesus, how, according to the story in Luke 2:46, asking and answering questions in the Temple at the age of twelve, he threw the teachers of his people into astonishment, and not less so his parents: «Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?»

I always get ask this question: Shouldn't you use less stevia in your recipes (since it's so concentrated)?

The Fox News host prided himself on asking contentious questions in a statement released earlier in the month, but also suggested his interview with President Trump could be a bit less hard - hitting.

Ozil will stay as he can care less of winning anything, as his mentor and protector only here he can get away with his mediocre performances and still have his place safe on the first team... Le Fraud would not last anywhere else before being sacked for incompetent that is why he would not accept the Barcelona job not only for his devotion to this club well aside he gets pay a fortune no questions asked....

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This is the kind of article that highlights exactly what is wrong with this club as a whole... so the question you're asking is what option would be less shitty... after the firestorm surrounding Wenger's contract last season, which somehow led to his highly questionable re-upping for 2 more years, things needed to dramatically change or the inevitable same old, same old was bound to occur... as of right now the bare minimum has occurred... we knew about Sead long before Wenger's renewal so that can't be considered a part of the «new world order»... so the only real changes are Lehman coming into the coaching staff, which could be positive but he's always been a Wenger lackey so the jury is still out, and the acquisition of Lacazette, who I really like as a player but I question the reasoning behind his signing

First, ask yourself this question and if you can answer it in two seconds or less, then you're good.

And the more a person learns about the balance of nature, the less he is likely to ask questions like the ones that a sheepman recently bellowed across a room: «Which is worth more, livestock or predators?»