Not exact matches
Twitter was my public chat board, my place to share blog content, my place to
ask public
questions and to
debate.
That is a
question no - one seems to be
asking in the
debate over solar - power subsidies, or the bigger
question of who pays for the state government's debt binge.
There have been just two
questions on income inequality
asked so far during the
debates — one of which was directed at Sen. Rand Paul right before a commercial break (he focused on Federal Reserve policy), and the other which was for Gov. Mike Huckabee (who bemoaned general government incompetence).
Sure, at
debates, like last night's great one in Milwaukee, candidates are always
asked questions that begin with, «As president, will you...» but we all know that presidents alone can't really do anything but put their socks on or, in more recent years, play a lot of golf.
It's also worth noting that of the 42
questions asked during the most recent Democratic presidential
debate, hosted by MSNBC, only five were about the economy, taxes or jobs (not including one about Hillary Clinton's paid speeches to Wall Street firms).
Ken Bone (C), a power plant employee from Belleville, Illinois, waits in the audience to
ask a
question about energy policy and jobs during the presidential
debate between Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, October 9, 2016.
Ken Bone captivated America when he
asked a
question on energy policy during the second presidential
debate.
The writing speaks to the community willing them to get involved by
asking questions and raising points over which healthy
debate might ensue.
Stop often and seek feedback on direction — In addition to
asking questions to prompt a
debate you should always check for feedback from the VC.
Leaders»
debates — like the one last night — are all about what those
asking the
questions think is important.
It is perhaps naive to have to
ask why a church council should even have to
debate such
questions and have to struggle to reaffirm orthodox positions.
Let me just
ask one
question: Can we PLEASE start the
debate in the country about how «God», «Hell», «Heaven», «Satan», «Muhammad», «Jesus», «Angels» «Ghosts» «Demons» and «Spirits of the Dead and or / Nature / Mother Earth» do not exist in any rational form as the way they are presented throughout world history?
«The Socratic method... is a form of inquiry and
debate between individuals with opposing viewpoints based on
asking and answering
questions to stimulate critical thinking and to illuminate ideas.»
Its up to the people
asking question to have a meaningful
debate or just another bunch of irrelevant talk about nothing important to the future of our nation.
If we recognize that in order to draw conclusions about matters of this sort, we must
ask questions not answered by faith in any direct way, the tone of our
debates can be improved.
And in that trajectory, many of the
questions being
asked and
debates being had (over and over again) just weren't all that relevant to me anymore.
The number is virtually unchanged (71 %) from when Ipsos / World Vision
asked the same
question in October, before the City of Lights experienced tragedy and American politicians began
debating state bans on Syrian refugees in response.
FedEx, When I first began writing the post, I actually served as a «
Debate Moderator» as well,
asking questions from both sides.
The point is not to
debate or challenge, but to
ask the sort of
questions that will help us understand one another better.
Remember that the point of our interview series is not to
debate or challenge, but to
ask the sort of
questions that will help us understand one another better.
Ethical
debates asking the Frankenstein's Monster
questions will increase in value as genetic manipulation and bio-technology integration grow.
In a second article about the practical implications of the justification
debate, this
question was
asked:
Michele Bachmann was
asked during the Iowa G.O.P.
debate what she meant when she said the Bible obliged her to «be submissive» to her husband, and there was an audible wave of boos — for the
question, not the answer.
The way a
question is
asked often frames the
debate.
Although decisions about this relationship had significant effects on the whole project, the
debate itself could become very abstruse and remote from the
questions asked even by those most personally and intellectually concerned about their faith.
That is why throughout the
debate, both Montgomery and Jones attempted to shame Fischer and Zahnd by rhetorically
asking them the
question Paul poses in Romans 9: «Who are you O man to talk back to your Maker?»
Yes, let the moderator
ask that or any other religious
question at these
debates.
Please remember the point of our interview series is not to
debate or challenge, but to
ask the sort of
questions that will help us understand one another better.
It deprives us of the opportunity to
ask hard
questions and engage in
debate.
Remember that the point is not to
debate or challenge, but to
ask the sort of
questions that will help us understand one another better.
And while it may seem to some that you're simply
asking me to engage in an theological tussle where we have a spirited
debate surrounding the right views of prayer and how God equips his people to speak to Him — your
question is deeper, and I'm guessing more personal.
What particularly fascinated me about what you was what you reported about NT Wright saying some of the theological
debates ask the wrong
questions.
2) You can maintain your position from a faith perspective, and say this, but then I'd have to seriously
question [a] your historical integrity (for example, the historical position of Revelations as canon, although more of a
debate than the other texts, was still NOWHERE NEAR contestable enough for you to draw this sort of conclusion) and [b] your philosophical integrity (for example, if you dismiss Revelations because it doesn't support your position, i'm going to
ask: by what authority do you think you have the right to discern this?
Kennedy's decision, now the law of the land, forces us to
ask a series of critically important
questions: Are citizens» whether Protestants, Catholics, Jews, or Mormons» who seek to apply transcendent moral values to public life welcome in political, legal, and cultural
debates?
Only when we see global South Christianity on its own terms — as opposed to
asking how it can contribute to our own
debates — can we see how the emerging churches are formulating their own responses to social and religious
questions, and how these issues are often viewed through a biblical lens.
The three non-sarcastic
questions Kozinski
asks in the middle of his second paragraph are certainly worth
debating, but I suspect his mind is made up.
During that Iowa
debate, Bush was
asked a follow - up
question about his Christian commitment.
These very basic
questions are, nowadays, rarely
asked, yet their subject is passionately and widely
debated.
Another tactic to insure real
debate would be to
ask candidates to confront one another on TV for three hours; after the first hour or so, candidates could no longer dodge
questions or avoid revealing their real attitudes and thinking processes to the public.
Mitt Romney recognized this as a return to the
question that moderator George Stephanopoulos had
asked him about contraception in the previous January 7th
debate.
SUM: so, of course i will not answer a
question that is
asking me (in its assumptions) to affirm the very thing under
debate.
Some players
debated that Wenger didn't try to bring in an outfield player, specifically a DM and a ST.. But seriously,
ask this
question to yourself, could that outfield player have prevented us from conceding those type of goals??
not
asking any
questions... just giving food for thought... stirring
debate... not resorting to personal insults.
The New York Times
asked a similar
question in a Room for
Debate — why do lawmakers make such a big deal out of marriage as more of us struggle to define family.
I know this
question has been
asked a lot of times and is highly
debated in society, so here it comes... should children play with toy guns?
Kevin Brodwick, founder of Thinkbaby and Thinksport explains why: «We always use the precautionary principle and as we expect the
debate on the safety of nano particles to continue, we
asked a simple
question: Does the product have to contain nano particles to be an effective sunscreen?
I run a modest but pretty vocal community of people who take issue with the current state of breastfeeding promotion (as well as people who are totally cool with breastfeeding promotion, but ended up using formula for whatever reason and are willing to put up with the constant drama and
debate because they have few other communities where they feel safe
asking questions about formula feeding).
It might also feature members of the public being allowed to contribute points in
debates, and — one day — to even
ask questions to the prime minister.
Tameka Kee with MediaPost
asked an excellent
question yesterday when we were emailing about her recent article on the Post's online political coverage: what about the Yahoo / Huffington Post / Slate online
debates: revolutionary, over-hyped, or just what we need?
I suspect when the
debate begins in Parliament the
question that will be
asked is to tell exactly why the 1.8 billion is needed.