Or is Paul defending against the charge by making a numbers argument — the scientists in question are on the same side as the consensus, so to challenge
any aspect of global warming science or politics is to make a statement about «the majority of scientists» (many of whom are in fact social scientists)?
Not exact matches
A new study by a team
of researchers from the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission's
science and knowledge service, sheds light on another, less well - known
aspect of how these ecosystems, and forests in particular, can protect our planet against
global warming.
Re # 8 (and to expand on # 13): I also think that a basic strategy
of the
global warming deniers is to focus on one
aspect of the
science over which there is some combination
of real and manufactured dispute and then try to make people think that this is the one crucial piece
of evidence on which the whole theory
of anthropogenic
warming rests... and thus that the dispute over this
aspect throws the whole theory into question.
This is my big gripe with certain
aspects of the physical
sciences regarding
global warming: Scientists forget we are people first, not experiments to be carried out.
Skeptical
Science (https://www.skepticalscience.com) has articles about every aspect of global warming you could think of, and some you couldn't, explaining how the science works and skilfully and rationally debunking the global warming doubters» or contrarians» arg
Science (https://www.skepticalscience.com) has articles about every
aspect of global warming you could think
of, and some you couldn't, explaining how the
science works and skilfully and rationally debunking the global warming doubters» or contrarians» arg
science works and skilfully and rationally debunking the
global warming doubters» or contrarians» arguments.
«The most discouraging
aspect of the statements out
of Japan, for many experts, was seeing the persistent gap between what
science is saying about
global warming and what countries are doing.»
David Victor, the University
of California, San Diego, political
science professor and author
of «
Global Warming Gridlock,» noted some subtler
aspects of the announcement that point to ever more efficient coal use in China, but also unrelenting growth in coal use — and carbon dioxide emissions.
Mark Bowen, the author
of «Censoring
Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth About
Global Warming» (Fresh Air interview) said he was initially skeptical about the investigation, but was pleasantly surprised that it captured not only the basic violations
of the public trust, but also dealt with «the subtler
aspects of censorship — the delaying
of information, the sorts
of intimidation that cause self censorship.»
And I don't often question your reasoning w / r / t the
science, per se, but on your arguments w / r / t the social
aspects of the debate and on a few occasions, the rhetoric
of your scientific arguments (such as your acceptance
of arguments about a «pause» in «
global warming.»
While I doubt that he'd claim that the weather control
aspects are more than
science fiction, he wants to be taken seriously on the topic
of global warming.
Why on earth Mr Lacis raves on about the ins and outs
of the technical issues under discussion in the area
of climate
science /
global warming when it is the issue
of the ethical and legal
aspects of Gleick's actions that are the immediate issue.
is a complete common sense look at the
science, politics, and energy - policy
aspects of global warming.
The problem is that the ~ $ 5 billion annual funding for all
aspects of global warming is financially starving many other deserving
science programs.
The report, titled «The Economics
of Climate Change,» claims that there are «positive
aspects to
global warming» and describes how «the
science of human - induced
warming remains uncertain.»
Nordhaus, W. D. Economic
aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Science, 2010, 107, 11721 - 11726.
The American Physical Society strenuously disagreed, saying «In light
of the significant settled
aspects of the
science, APS totally rejects Dr. Lewis» claim that
global warming is a «scam» and a «pseudoscientific fraud.»»
Guest essay by John Mauer One
aspect of the
science of global warming is the measurement
of temperature on a local basis.