A federal judge Friday delayed sentencing of Edward Walsh, and set a date for a hearing on whether new
assertions by federal prosecutors should potentially increase the prison time faced by the former Suffolk Conservative Party leader.
A federal judge delayed sentencing of Edward Walsh, and set a date for a pre-sentencing hearing on whether new
assertions by federal prosecutors are accurate and should potentially increase the prison time faced by the former Suffolk Conservative Party leader.
Not exact matches
Walsh's defense attorneys have argued in court papers that
federal prosecutors now unfairly want U.S. District Judge Arthur Spatt to boost the potential sentence to 37 to 46 months —
by taking into account new
assertions.
In sum, I questions the
assertion that
federal judges «should not make policy judgments» at sentencing because: (1) such judgments seem inevitable and are clearly made
by prosecutors in every criminal case, and (2) a fair reading of the text of 3553 (a) suggests that Congress has ordered
federal judges to make individualized policy judgments in each and every sentencing.