Two:
assessing changes in forcings associated with changes in climate — using data sufficient to do the statistics.
Not exact matches
Indeed the estimate of aerosol
forcing used
in the calculation of transient climate response (TCR)
in the paper does not come directly from climate models, but instead incorporates an adjustment to those models so that the
forcing better matches the
assessed estimates from the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).
Given that it doesn't matter much which
forcing is
changing, sensitivity can be
assessed from any particular period
in the past where the
changes in forcing are known and the corresponding equilibrium temperature
change can be estimated.
It
assesses an athletes» ability to
change quickly from an eccentric to a concentric contraction and their ability to develop maximal
forces in minimal ground contact time.
Given that it doesn't matter much which
forcing is
changing, sensitivity can be
assessed from any particular period
in the past where the
changes in forcing are known and the corresponding equilibrium temperature
change can be estimated.
However, none of these issues really affect the attribution argument because a) differences
in magnitude of
forcing over time are
assessed by way of the scales
in the attribution process, and b) errors
in the spatial pattern will end up
in the residuals, which are not large enough to
change the overall assessment.
To my mind, the «first - order»
forcings would be the ones without which you can't really do without
in assessing global climate
change.
[Response: If it were indeed true that CO2 always lags temperature
changes, never leads (which I don't believe) then what you would have proved is that past analoges are of limited value to
assessing the present warming, because
in this case we do know that the
forcing if from GHG's, since we know the CO2 increase is anthro — William]
Recently I have been looking at the climate models collected
in the CMIP3 archive which have been analysed and
assessed in IPCC and it is very interesting to see how the
forced changes — i.e. the
changes driven the external factors such as greenhouse gases, tropospheric aerosols, solar
forcing and stratospheric volcanic aerosols drive the
forced response
in the models (which you can see by averaging out several simulations of the same model with the same
forcing)-- differ from the internal variability, such as associated with variations of the North Atlantic and the ENSO etc, which you can see by looking at individual realisations of a particular model and how it differs from the ensemble mean.
The disagreement arises from different assessments of the value and importance of particular classes of evidence as well as disagreement about the appropriate logical framework for linking and
assessing the evidence — my reasoning is weighted heavily
in favor of observational evidence and understanding of natural internal variability of the climate system, whereas the IPCC's reasoning is weighted heavily
in favor of climate model simulations and external
forcing of climate
change.
They are used to investigate the processes responsible for maintaining the general circulation and its natural and
forced variability (Chapter 8), to
assess the role of various
forcing factors
in observed climate
change (Chapter 9) and to provide projections of the response of the system to scenarios of future external
forcing (Chapter 10).
Since there are some differences
in the climate
changes simulated by various models even if the same
forcing scenario is used, the models are compared to
assess the uncertainties
in the responses.
Real Climate defines climate
forcings as «the
changes that affect the energy balance of the planet» and «first order
forcings» as «To my mind, the «first - order»
forcings would be the ones without which you can't really do without
in assessing global climate
change.
Evidently, it is critically important to include endogenous
forces such as competition
in assessing and predicting forest
changes under the current and future climates.
However, to
assess climate response beyond surface temperature
change (e.g.,
changes in precipitation, latent heat release from surface, or
in the surface heat and moisture balance), it becomes necessary to understand the surface radiative
forcing for all
forcings.
The effect of
changes in anthropogenic and natural
forcings on global surface temperature after 1998 is
assessed with a statistical model that is estimated with a sample that ends
in 1998.
Our results further indicate that while the
change in cloud
forcing may not accurately represent the sign or magnitude of cloud feedback, it does provide a useful metric for
assessing intermodel differences
in cloud feedback.
Here, we also
assess aspects of irreversibility
in the context of abrupt
change, multiple steady states and hysteresis, i.e., the question whether a
change (abrupt or not) would be reversible if the
forcing was reversed or removed (e.g., Boucher et al., 2012).
«Carbon Tracker lauds the FSB Task
Force's efforts to harmonize disclosure of the material risks of climate
change in order to provide decision - useful information to the users of corporate reports.f Addressing current disclosure gaps will allow users of financial disclosures to better
assess how companies consider and manage climate - related risks,» said Mark Campanale, founder of the Carbon Tracker Initiative.
The objective of this chapter is to
assess scientific understanding about the extent to which the observed climate
changes that are reported
in Chapters 3 to 6 are expressions of natural internal climate variability and / or externally
forced climate
change.
When
assessing changes in ENSO, it must be recognised that an El Niño - like pattern can apparently occur at a variety of time - scales ranging from interannual to inter-decadal (Zhang et al., 1997), either without any
change in forcing or as a response to external
forcings such as increased CO2 (Meehl and Washington, 1996; Knutson and Manabe, 1998; Noda et al., 1999a, b; Boer et al., 2000b; Meehl et al., 2000b).
Both life insurance agents and brokers will help you
assess your life insurance needs; arrange for the purchase of a policy; provide ongoing support (say you want to
change your beneficiary, renew, convert or
change your coverage amount); and help your beneficiary submit a claim should you die while the policy's
in force.
The policy statement «The Future of Pediatrics: Mental Health Competencies for Pediatric Primary Care» outlined the skills pediatricians need
in the area of mental health.37 The AAP Task
Force on Mental Health has developed materials to help pediatricians
assess their current practice and readiness to
change and to code accurately for mental health screening and services.38, 39 The AAP also developed a Web site providing resources and materials free of charge (http://www2.aap.org/commpeds/dochs/mentalhealth/KeyResources.html) 40 as well as «Addressing Mental Health Concerns
in Primary Care: A Clinician's Toolkit,» 41 which is available for a fee.
We
assessed the possibility that
changing trends
in social
forces and knowledge about the risks of smoking may have affected the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and smoking behaviors.