Not exact matches
The argument
for targeting
assessments and interventions on where students are in their
learning (
rather than on where somebody wishes they were) is not an argument
for lowering standards, providing success experiences or making students feel good.
Although, it is a common practice
for learning objects also to include
assessment, personally, I wouldn't recommend it, as I'd
rather prefer to keep
assessment separately of the eLearning object
for reusability purposes.
«In general, I think it's important
for students to realize through experience that
assessment and testing can help them understand their strengths and needs as learners, and I think it is vital that students
learn the «literacy» format of tests so that they control the test situation
rather than being controlled by it,» said Walton.
As you so rightly point out, there would need to be lots of celebrating of
learning milestones but this needs to be celebrating the richness of «
learning for life»
rather than just «
learning to pass discrete
assessments».
Normally, research studies focus on scores
for No Child Left Behind
assessments,
rather than on how much or little academically gifted students are
learning.
So,
rather than beginning with a preference
for a particular approach to
assessment, we began by recognising that subject syllabuses identify different kinds of
learning which are best assessed in different ways.
Because they generally provide information about the full range of course objectives, and are not designed primarily to identify starting points
for further teaching and
learning, such
assessments typically provide coarse
rather than fine diagnostic detail.
Although we can take steps as individual educators to avoid
learned helplessness, we need to reexamine the systems of schooling, from curriculum to
assessment and instruction, to allow
for empowerment
rather than always getting the right answer.
For example,» improving history essay structure for EAL pupils through targeted use of formative feedback» rather than simply «improving assessment for learning» leads to more focused professional learning, which makes it easier for the participant to evaluate and refine their approa
For example,» improving history essay structure
for EAL pupils through targeted use of formative feedback» rather than simply «improving assessment for learning» leads to more focused professional learning, which makes it easier for the participant to evaluate and refine their approa
for EAL pupils through targeted use of formative feedback»
rather than simply «improving
assessment for learning» leads to more focused professional learning, which makes it easier for the participant to evaluate and refine their approa
for learning» leads to more focused professional
learning, which makes it easier
for the participant to evaluate and refine their approa
for the participant to evaluate and refine their approach.
Formative
assessment is not
assessment of
learning,
rather formative
assessment is often called
assessment for learning.
Statewide
assessments across the US are essentially «final exam» tests to find out how much kids have
learned,
rather than diagnostic tests designed to help teachers teach [except in an after - the - fact way to perhaps adjust instructional practice
for the next group of kids, a relatively weak form of diagnostic testing
for individual teachers].
Author and consultant Tom Schimmer concurs, «Collaborative Common
Assessments is set to become the definitive guide for educators who are serious about utilizing common assessments to support learning rather than simply mon
Assessments is set to become the definitive guide
for educators who are serious about utilizing common
assessments to support learning rather than simply mon
assessments to support
learning rather than simply monitoring it.
The basic argument
for interim
assessments is actually quite compelling: let's fix our students»
learning problems during the year,
rather than waiting
for high - stakes state tests to make summative judgments on us all at the end of the year, because interim
assessments can be aggregated and have external referents (projection to standards, norms, scales).
How would
assessment following these guidelines promote
learning for a wide range of students
rather than simply measuring it?
As Tomlinson notes in this month's Watch This Spot video, it's
assessment for learning,
rather than
assessment of
learning.
o Create
assessments that allows
for learning that is valued
rather than testing a narrow band of skills and ensure that parents understand the difference.
For teachers,
assessment can feel like something imposed on them
rather than a tool to support student
learning and growth.
Possibilities
for authentic
assessment include extending
learning rather than merely measuring it and leveraging a child's home knowledge and experience,
rather than ignoring it.