A priori (by «dichotomic» analysis
of the various outlets theoretically offered to our freedom
of action) as well as a posteriori (by classification
of the various
human attitudes in fact observable around us), three alternatives, together forming a logically connected sequence, seem to express and exhaust all the
possibilities open to our
assessment and choice as we contemplate the future
of Mankind: a) pessimism or optimism; b) the optimism
of withdrawal or the optimism
of evolution; c) evolution in terms
of the many or
of the unit.
The
assessment of substantial risk decidedly requires that the Minister consider the «personal risk» faced by an individual... But I would not foreclose the
possibility that there may be cases in which general evidence
of pervasive and systemic
human rights abuses in the receiving state can form the basis for a finding that the person sought faces a substantial risk
of torture or mistreatment.»