Further, you dismiss the Harper results (who found random error in the Southeastern Indian Ocean
assessment of major storms and no change in the trends found in WHCC) by saying that that the Australian Bureau of Meteorology had no access to satellite data until 1980.
Not exact matches
Whatever the political solution, accurate risk
assessments require hydrologists and climate scientists to determine the frequency
of major flood producing
storms over hundreds
of years.
The assistence
of higher resolution projections to the vulnerability
assessment of Amsterdam may lie in the analysis
of consequences
of an assumed sea level change on the probability that a
major storm or inland precipitation event (or a combination
of these) lead to water levels that are disruptive for the city.
The IPCC notes in its most recent scientific
assessment that there are «[n] o robust trends in annual numbers
of tropical
storms, hurricanes and
major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin,» and that there are «no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency.»
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported in its most recent scientific
assessment that «[n] o robust trends in annual numbers
of tropical
storms, hurricanes, and
major hurricanes... have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin,» and that there are «no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency.»