The first provides an overview and comparative analysis of the existing
assessments of student learning outcomes in literacy and numeracy in primary education in the region.
Key Highlight: • Orchestrated
the assessment of student learning outcomes and promoted the GED / ABE Program throughout the community.
Not exact matches
The main focus
of coaching and mentoring conversations for school improvement is to build the competency and capability
of teachers, so that they can take steps towards achieving the school's strategic vision and priorities in the curriculum, teaching and
learning, and
assessment, and can effectively make judgments about
students» progress and
outcomes.
Harvard Graduate School
of Education will work with the Strategic Education Research Partnership and other partners to complete a program
of work designed to a) investigate the predictors
of reading comprehension in 4th - 8th grade
students, in particular the role
of skills at perspective - taking, complex reasoning, and academic language in predicting deep comprehension
outcomes, b) track developmental trajectories across the middle grades in perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension, c) develop and evaluate curricular and pedagogical approaches designed to promote deep comprehension in the content areas in 4th - 8th grades, and d) develop and evaluate an intervention program designed for 6th - 8th grade
students reading at 3rd - 4th grade level.The HGSE team will take responsibility, in collaboration with colleagues at other institutions, for the following components
of the proposed work: Instrument development: Pilot data collection using interviews and candidate
assessment items, collaboration with DiscoTest colleagues to develop coding
of the pilot data so as to produce well - justified
learning sequences for perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension.Curricular development: HGSE investigators Fischer, Selman, Snow, and Uccelli will contribute to the development
of a discussion - based curriculum for 4th - 5th graders, and to the expansion
of an existing discussion - based curriculum for 6th - 8th graders, with a particular focus on science content (Fischer), social studies content (Selman), and academic language skills (Snow & Uccelli).
Summative
assessments take the form
of products, and many formative
assessments are planned to ensure that
students master multiple
learning outcomes in a PBL project.
The download pack includes: - Key activities scheme, week by week
learning activities - All worksheets which are ready to print or use on a whiteboard / projector / interactive whiteboard (the colour theory presentation is interactive)- Visual examples
of final
outcomes - Artist image powerpoint and facts - Head templates for designs There is also a
student self
assessment book and presentation list for boards / sketchbook page content to allow the
student to work towards the
assessment objectives in art.
Over the course
of the two - year project, schools will begin to implement pathway - wide systems
of performance - based
assessment that include the use
of common,
outcomes - aligned rubrics and performance tasks, and a culminating
student demonstration
of learning and skill — all aligned with the Common Core and the 4Cs.
Researchers from RAND studying the first year
of Vermont's implementation
of portfolio
assessments for fourth and eighth graders found that the development
of portfolios (work was selected by
students with input from classroom teachers) had several positive educational outcomes: Students and teachers were more enthusiastic and had a more positive attitude about learning, teachers devoted «substantially more attention» to problem solving and communication (two areas represented by portfolios), students spent more time working in small groups or in pairs, and teachers felt the portfolios afforded them a new perspective on stude
students with input from classroom teachers) had several positive educational
outcomes:
Students and teachers were more enthusiastic and had a more positive attitude about learning, teachers devoted «substantially more attention» to problem solving and communication (two areas represented by portfolios), students spent more time working in small groups or in pairs, and teachers felt the portfolios afforded them a new perspective on stude
Students and teachers were more enthusiastic and had a more positive attitude about
learning, teachers devoted «substantially more attention» to problem solving and communication (two areas represented by portfolios),
students spent more time working in small groups or in pairs, and teachers felt the portfolios afforded them a new perspective on stude
students spent more time working in small groups or in pairs, and teachers felt the portfolios afforded them a new perspective on
student work.
Mayes and de Freitas (2004) state that the use
of technology can be used to achieve better
learning outcomes, more effective
assessments or a more cost effective way
of bringing
learning environments to
students; and that reforming practice requires transformation
of the understanding
of the principles.
This small scale seminar will discuss the rationales, viability, and implications
of the idea
of global
assessment of students»
learning outcomes in higher education.
The
outcome, she suggests, «can be a richer understanding
of real problem solving» for both
student learning and teacher
assessments.
I find it intriguing that we have not fully realised the affordance that technology offers in relation to real - time (just in - time) formative
assessment practices that research tells us makes a significant impact on
student learning (Wiliam, Black, Hattie) I have a pre-school age child whose school uses a «reporting / communication» tool where daily updates are captured by the educators including work samples,
outcomes linked, photos
of my child engaged in
learning tasks etc..
Consider having
students play one
of the games below, and then, to measure
learning outcomes, use traditional
assessment strategies like matching claims to evidence.
Much
of the focus in
assessments is on
outcomes: Did
students meet
learning goals?
Webinar participants will
learn about the wealth
of information well - crafted
assessments can reveal, and will gain insights into how districts
of all sizes can use
assessment strategies, tools, and services to improve
student outcomes and prepare for the Common Core State Standards.
Just try to decipher this recent press release about a new study proving «rubric - based
assessment can be taken to scale and can produce valid findings with credible and actionable information about
student learning that can be used to improve curricular and assignment designs and to increase effectiveness
of programs and classes in advancing the most important
learning outcomes of college.»
We support efforts to contribute to a national dialogue about the power
of assessment to support positive
learning outcomes for all
students.
The lesson follows a clear and logical
learning journey, involving progressively more challenging tasks in which
students: - Portray their understanding
of witches and witchcraft; -
Learn more about witches in a historical context through a fun «true or false» game; - Define, identify, and understand dramatic irony; - Read sections
of Macbeth and complete tasks to demonstrate their understanding; - Answer key questions about the witches that test their knowledge in relation to each
of the English
assessment outcomes; - Evaluate a modelled example
of an analytical paragraph in relation to the witches; - Analyse the witches» characteristics in their own responses; - Evaluate each others» analytical responses.
Ongoing dialogue, the use
of assessment as feedback, and the evaluation
of instructional decisions and
learning tactics used by
students hinge on the picture
of progress painted in the context
of the intended
learning outcomes.
Measurement - driven reform expanded the role
of assessment into the policy arena in two important ways: a) it focused attention on what
students should
learn (
outcomes), and b) it made teaching toward the test a valued instructional strategy.
Student assessment is also one
of the most powerful methods for improving
learning outcomes across all subjects and grade levels.
A helpful question for members
of the selection team to consider is how will each
assessment be explained to parents in relation to
student learning outcomes.
Teams must focus their efforts on crucial questions related to
learning and generate products that reflect that focus, such as lists
of essential
outcomes, different kinds
of assessment, analyses
of student achievement, and strategies for improving results.
Across the country, states are adopting a number
of different strategies to improve
outcomes for
students: third grade reading requirements, literacy initiatives, new
assessment and accountability systems, plus an increased focus on data - driven decision - making are changing how districts approach teaching and
learning for all
students.
Considered a seasoned collaborator and evidence - based strategist, Dr. McGlawn served as the Senior Associate for Linked
Learning at The Education Trust - West, where she led
assessments of Linked
Learning implementation, with a strong focus on the quality
of curriculum and instruction delivered through Linked
Learning pathways, as well as equitable systemic access and improved
outcomes for
students.
Assessing
student outcomes: Performance
assessment using the dimensions
of learning model.
The books in this series define terms and share mental models; detail benefits; share how to plan action; detail what action looks like; identify
learning opportunities; explore how to teach
students about school; examine potential barriers and how to overcome them; address
assessment; and detail the ultimate
outcomes of Meaningful
Student Involvement.
Proponents
of these
assessments find them useful in guiding decision making regarding a
student's
learning despite research yielding «sparse evidence that it has produced measurable or observable improvements in educational
outcomes» (Hansen, 1993).
The intended
outcomes of the formal coaching process for the inviting teacher are the development
of reflective practice and decision making; a refined and expanded repertoire
of teaching strategies; an enhanced understanding
of curriculum, instruction, and
assessment; and the capacity to provide high - impact,
learning - focused teaching strategies in an environment characterized by interesting and engaging work for
students.
As Moss and Brookhart emphasize, the goal is not to «do» formative
assessment, but to embrace a major cultural change that moves away from teacher - led instruction to a «partnership
of intentional inquiry» between
student and teacher, with better teaching and
learning as the
outcome.
He coauthored three books on
assessment, Assessing
Learning in the Classroom (NEA), Assessing
Outcomes: Performance
Assessment Using the Dimensions
of Learning Model (ASCD), and Evaluation Tools to Improve as Well as Evaluate
Student Performance (Corwin Press).
«Formative
assessment is a process used by teachers and
students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and
learning to improve
students» achievement
of intended instructional
outcomes.»
We find that
learning outcomes are essentially the same — that
students in the hybrid format «pay no price» for this mode
of instruction in terms
of pass rates, final exam scores, and performance on a standardized
assessment of statistical literacy.
Learning cycles integrate knowledge and assessment: Teachers make an intense effort to get to know their students» strengths and weaknesses at the beginning of a cycle and fashion many of the cycle's learning outcomes and activities on the basis of what studen
Learning cycles integrate knowledge and
assessment: Teachers make an intense effort to get to know their
students» strengths and weaknesses at the beginning
of a cycle and fashion many
of the cycle's
learning outcomes and activities on the basis of what studen
learning outcomes and activities on the basis
of what
students need.
Outcomes of learning: Results from the 2000 program for international
student assessment of 15 - year - olds in reading, math, and science.
For example, teams are expected to clarify essential
outcomes; develop and utilize the results
of common, formative
assessments; collaboratively analyze
student learning (particularly the results
of formative common
assessments); and reflect on their instructional practices in order to improve the
learning levels
of their
students.
Jacqueline Ancess describes how teachers in New York City secondary schools increase their own
learning while improving
student outcomes • Milbrey W. McLaughlin and Joel Zarrow demonstrate how teachers
learn to use data to improve their practice and meet educational standards • Lynne Miller presents a case study
of a long - lived school — university partnership • Beverly Falk recounts stories
of teachers working together to develop performance
assessments, to understand their
student's
learning, to re-think their curriculum, and much more • Laura Stokes analyzes a school that successfully uses inquiry groups.
The results include significant improvement in
learning outcomes for all
students on statewide
assessments, as well as a 40 % reduction in the number
of students referred for initial placement in special education and a 50 % reduction in the number
of students identified as having a
learning disability.
Schools and school systems will need a laser - like focus on building the capacity
of teachers through strong induction programs, job - embedded professional
learning, support for implementation
of the new Common Core Performance Standards with accompanying
assessments and teacher evaluation programs linked to
student achievement
outcomes.
The fundamental forms
of science
assessment that result in
learning addressed by the
assessment component include the following
student outcomes: (a) identifying, constructing, or distinguishing between
of examples illustrating the presence or absence
of a concept in everyday scenarios, (b) predicting or describing how to produce a specific
outcome in everyday scenarios, based upon knowledge
of concept relationship (s), and (c) explaining plausible reasons for an occurrence based upon prior knowledge
of relevant concept relationships (i.e., abductive reasoning).
A study
of Arizona's career ladder program, which requires the use
of various methods
of student assessment to complement evaluations
of teachers» practice, found that, over time, participating teachers demonstrated an increased ability to create locally - developed
assessment tools to assess
student learning gains in their classrooms; to develop and evaluate pre - and post-tests; to define measurable
outcomes in hard - to - quantify areas like art, music, and physical education; and to monitor
student learning growth.
(b) The purposes
of establishing charter schools are: (i) to stimulate the development
of innovative programs within public education; (ii) to provide opportunities for innovative
learning and
assessments; (iii) to provide parents and
students with greater options in selecting schools within and outside their school districts; (iv) to provide teachers with a vehicle for establishing schools with alternative, innovative methods
of educational instruction and school structure and management; (v) to encourage performance - based educational programs; (vi) to hold teachers and school administrators accountable for
students» educational
outcomes; and (vii) to provide models for replication in other public schools.
To achieve organizational effectiveness, Ashford University is committed to developing and improving
student learning through continuous
assessment of course objectives, faculty contributions,
learning environments,
student performance, and program
outcomes.
For instance, performance on infrequent statewide
assessments does not capture all dimensions
of student learning and classroom
outcomes.38 Further, the majority
of teachers work in grades or subject areas to which state
assessments do not apply, which poses a challenge in defining valid and reliable measures
of student achievement.
Implemented correctly, the common standards and
assessments can vault education over the barrier
of low - level test preparation and toward the goal
of world - class
learning outcomes for all
students.
Now we have
assessment systems increasingly capable
of providing feedback on
student learning and
outcomes.
In other words, when teacher teams realize the powerful connection between their instructional and
assessment practices and the
outcome of their
students»
learning based on
assessment evidence — that new growth, their sense
of effectiveness, and the ultimate impact on
student learning is significantly increased.
«Formative
assessment is a planned, ongoing process used by all
students and teachers during
learning and teaching to elicit and use evidence
of student learning to improve
student understanding
of intended disciplinary
learning outcomes and support
students to become more self - directed learners.»
When
students are themselves engaged in the
assessment process, they know what the expected
outcomes of the
learning will be, they know where they are in mastering those
outcomes, and they are expected to be involved in planning and participating in their next steps in
learning the
outcomes.
(1997) E652: Current Research in Post-School Transition Planning (2003) E586: Curriculum Access and Universal Design for
Learning (1999) E626: Developing Social Competence for All
Students (2002) E650: Diagnosing Communication Disorders in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse
Students (2003) E608: Five Homework Strategies for Teaching
Students with Disabilities (2001) E654: Five Strategies to Limit the Burdens
of Paperwork (2003) E571: Functional Behavior Assessment and Behavior Intervention Plans (1998) E628: Helping
Students with Disabilities Participate in Standards - Based Mathematics Curriculum (2002) E625: Helping
Students with Disabilities Succeed in State and District Writing
Assessments (2002) E597: Improving Post-School
Outcomes for
Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (2000) E564: Including
Students with Disabilities in Large - Scale Testing: Emerging Practices (1998) E568: Integrating Assistive Technology Into the Standard Curriculum (1998) E577:
Learning Strategies (1999) E587: Paraeducators: Factors That Influence Their Performance, Development, and Supervision (1999) E735: Planning Accessible Conferences and Meetings (1994) E593: Planning
Student - Directed Transitions to Adult Life (2000) E580: Positive Behavior Support and Functional Assessment (1999) E633: Promoting the Self - Determination
of Students with Severe Disabilities (2002) E609: Public Charter Schools and
Students with Disabilities (2001) E616: Research on Full - Service Schools and
Students with Disabilities (2001) E563: School - Wide Behavioral Management Systems (1998) E632: Self - Determination and the Education
of Students with Disabilities (2002) E585: Special Education in Alternative Education Programs (1999) E599: Strategic Processing
of Text: Improving Reading Comprehension for
Students with
Learning Disabilities (2000) E638: Strategy Instruction (2002) E579:
Student Groupings for Reading Instruction (1999) E621:
Students with Disabilities in Correctional Facilities (2001) E627: Substance Abuse Prevention and Intervention for
Students with Disabilities: A Call to Educators (2002) E642: Supporting Paraeducators: A Summary
of Current Practices (2003) E647: Teaching Decision Making to
Students with
Learning Disabilities by Promoting Self - Determination (2003) E590: Teaching Expressive Writing To
Students with
Learning Disabilities (1999) E605: The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP)(2000) E592: The Link Between Functional Behavioral
Assessments (FBAs) and Behavioral Intervention Plans (BIPs)(2000) E641: Universally Designed Instruction (2003) E639: Using Scaffolded Instruction to Optimize
Learning (2002) E572: Violence and Aggression in Children and Youth (1998) E635: What Does a Principal Need to Know About Inclusion?