Those huge pools used to represent a tiny part of BMOAM's ETF business, but have accounted for some 30 % of
asset flows over the past three years, Gopaul says.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan
assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash
flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Northern Star Resources says it is generating
over $ 200 million in free cash
flow per year on the back of an expansion of its
asset base, lower costs and increased gold sales.
In August, the investment firm Richard Bernstein Advisors compared the performance of the average investor — based on the monthly
flows of money in and out of mutual funds — against a variety of stock indexes, commodities and other
asset classes
over a 20 - year period ending Dec. 31, 2013.
Takeover specialists and their investment bankers pore
over balance sheets to find undervalued real estate and other
assets, and to see how much cash
flow is being invested in long - term research and development, depreciation and modernization that can be diverted to pay out as tax - deductible interest.
«
Over the next 10 years, we estimate ~ $ 740 billion in ETF
flows resulting from 1) DC
assets rolling off into IRAs as workers retire (est. $ 6.3 tn, adding $ 440bn in ETFs), 2) retail
assets moving from wirehouses to independent advisors (est. $ 2.7 tn, adding $ 300bn in ETFs), and 3) increasing regulatory scrutiny on management fees on retirement
assets under advisory,» notes Goldman.
However, it's only risky on
assets you have no control
over or when you
over leverage without looking at the cash
flow closely after debt service.
Over 2017, we saw sizeable capital
flows into EM
assets, with approximately $ 80bn going into EM equities and $ 110bn going into EM fixed income4.
«There are pockets of areas that are getting stronger and weaker — certainly there is less demand in the oil patch — but overall I have not seen any market change in the amount of deal
flow over the course of 2014 or 2015,» reports Michael W. Scolaro, managing director and group head of
Asset Based Lending at BMO Harris Bank.
Kiskorna has
over 25 years of experience in
asset based and cash
flow lending and business development.
For starters, the variations between earnings and cash
flow not only arise in working capital changes
over time (their influence on a firm's cash
flow from operations), but also in the timing of the cost of replacing those
assets that generate earnings (capital expenditures versus depreciation).
Hedge funds saw the highest year - on - year growth in
assets, from $ 2.30 trillion to
over $ 2.66 trillion, as a result of strong investment gains and new
asset flows.
Also, «soft» expenses that aren't really paid for in cash, but give a reflection of the expensing of
assets over time (like depreciation expense), show up on the income statement but don't on the statement of cash
flow.
Flexible finance solutions enable the purchase of essential security technology and other intangible
assets over a set period of time to ensure better cash
flow management at a time of Government funding cuts.
Assets typically
flow to the firm that takes
over the enterprise.
The portfolio is to consist primarily of cash
flowing assets which increase the amount of income they produce
over time.
Since there is an opportunity cost when choosing one investment
over another, the steady returns of cash
flowing assets must win in cases where all else is equal
over those investments which produce no income.
Instead, we acquire
assets over time that produce increasing amounts of cash
flow that will ultimately finance our financial freedom.
Over the next year or so I think you may see the better mining companies such as the mid-tier South African platinum producers, and the London - listed silver producers evolve from being
asset plays to actually being valued on cash
flow and earnings.
And here is the second try: Gross margins as a ratio of
Assets over 13 %, free cash
flow yield
over 5 %, Long - term debt as a ratio of free cash
flow greater than five, less than 20 % above the 52 - week low.
Managers must focus on liquidity as well as solvency, which is the process of generating sufficient cash
flow to purchase
assets over the long term.
It is not as if they are to the point where they have no
assets in the plans and must make benefit payments out of cash
flow, but the plans are distinctly underfunded on any basis that assumes fair investment returns
over the next 30 years, which would be 5 % per year, and not 7 - 9 % per year.
I've found
over the years that even for absolutely necessary expenses, such as car repairs, etc, many times it possible to absorb at least part of the expense from regular cash
flow without using saved
assets.
Of course with all the new money
flowing into these
asset classes, the spreads
over Treasuries have come down, so on an absolute basis investors are still struggling to find investments with enough income for their needs.
The idea is to increase equity by paying down debt with the free cash
flow and also to benefit from the
asset appreciating
over time.
We create a Global Blend Rank by ranking our global universe of
over 15,000 companies in terms of both their Value (across range of metrics based on dividends, earnings, cash
flow,
assets and sales) and Quality (based on measures of profitability, stability and financial strength).
The ability to spend cash
flows out of capital gains from either
asset may be more limited
over the next few years.
Over the long run, a risk parity strategy (which is to say, generally being long both risky and less risky
assets) is a highly effective way to provide diversified exposure through the ongoing ebb and
flow of market cycles.
Best of all, since the stock market generally rises
over time (9.1 % annually since 1871),
asset managers should theoretically have the wind at their backs when it comes to steady, strong, and highly profitable growth in sales, earnings, and cash
flow.
The other important safety factor is the company's fortress - like balance sheet, courtesy of its strong current ratio (short - term
assets / short - term liabilities), modest net debt position, and free cash
flow that comfortably covers the dividend nearly twice
over.
Year
over year, the cash
flow from operations have grown and the company has been acquiring lots of quality
assets to keep the cash
flow growing.
It also provides steady cash
flow that can be used to expand its
asset portfolio
over the long run.
Let's say you keep buying more of your ETF's
over 20 years and you only do cash
flow rebalancing through sizable new investment funds each year (rather then selling some
assets).
Flows into alternative mutual funds and ETFs remained fairly constant over the year in terms of where the flows were directed, with a total of $ 20 billion of new assets being allocated to funds in Morningstar's alternative catego
Flows into alternative mutual funds and ETFs remained fairly constant
over the year in terms of where the
flows were directed, with a total of $ 20 billion of new assets being allocated to funds in Morningstar's alternative catego
flows were directed, with a total of $ 20 billion of new
assets being allocated to funds in Morningstar's alternative categories.
He argues that other groups, such as low - and middle - income taxpayers, the elderly, and less successful investors, typically have low financial flexibility, and therefore have much less discretion
over when to realize capital gains as they need the cash
flow generated by these
asset sales.
Now for the defensive investor, one needs to make time to investigate financial statements (note the plural), P / E, P / B,
asset values, cash
flow, ROE and so on -
over a period of years.
The best we can do is something like GMO does, and go to each
asset class and try to estimate the free cash
flow yield of each
asset class
over the next full market cycle (5 - 10 years) given the current prices being paid.
Our bias for tangible
over intangible
assets will almost certainly lead us to a lower valuation for YHOO than another investor with a preference for intangible
assets which generate earnings or cash
flow.
But it also has an important unique feature (compared to competitors) to keep things «Real World»: You have total control
over how annual cash
flow surpluses and / or deficits are allocated between investment
asset accounts in the Financial Planner module.
By building your cash
flow stream
over multiple
asset classes you will be in a much better financial position where your monthly expenses will be covered by the cash
flow.
However, it's only risky on
assets you have no control
over or when you
over leverage without looking at the cash
flow closely after debt service.
And with its guaranteed cash value growth year
over year, it provides an excellent «safe bucket» of
assets that can help insulate you from the ebbs and
flows of the stock market.
Financing rentals obviously restricts cash
flow on each home, but owning several would help with stability of your finances
over the life of your holding of these
assets.
To them mainly it is tax benefits, equity growth
over time, quality of the
asset with no headache, cash
flow.
By investing in real estate, the risk you assume is minimized with tangible
assets that don't significantly change in value
over short periods of time not to mention real estate generates steady monthly cash
flow each month for the duration of the investment.
Instead, I would advise you to accumulate cash
flowing real estate
assets and pay them off
over time so the income they create takes care of your retirement lifestyle while the principal (net worth) is untouched and rising.
The primary reason for this is that,
over time, older
assets consume a higher percentage of incoming rent as operating expenses (due to major repairs required) resulting in lower cash
flow and return on investment.
Combined with a portfolio of stocks and bonds, real estate can help boost returns and cash
flow while spreading risk
over another
asset class so your nest egg doesn't tumble with the next stock market crash.
I think anything
over $ 100 positive cash
flow is a good deal, especially if the property is located in a romantic location with lots of appreciation... You're benefiting from owning and controlling that
asset, while your tenant is making the payment!
Through SANTÉ Realty's proven 4 step process we have been able to increase the values of underperforming
assets and create monthly cash -
flow for investors for
over 7 years.