Current
asset ratio greater than 1.5 9.
Not exact matches
I know first hand of one of the world's most celebrated wealth management companies that charges clients roughly 1 % of
assets each year, and then parks a
great deal of the money into S&P 500 index funds with expense
ratios of 1 % to 1.25 % (compared to less than 0.10 % for an industry leader such as Vanguard).
Consider here what motivated the banks in the first place: a
great amount of their
assets turned out to be worthless (the famous «toxic»
assets) when the bust hit in 2008, and they found it difficult to maintain minimum capital
ratios; their deposit liabilities of course remained the same, and initially the level of non-borrowed bank reserves went deeply into negative territory (this is to say, they were forced to borrow directly from the Fed's discount window during this time).
Gilmartin said the company will put about 10 percent of its
assets each year into development, about the same
ratio she says it's been at since coming out of the
Great Recession.
As this table shows, all three frac sand producers have current
ratios (short - term
assets divided by short - term liabilities) and quick
ratios (liquid
assets divided by short - term liabilities) much
greater than 1, signifying strong balance sheets that should allow all three to weather the current oil crash.
And here is the second try: Gross margins as a
ratio of
Assets over 13 %, free cash flow yield over 5 %, Long - term debt as a
ratio of free cash flow
greater than five, less than 20 % above the 52 - week low.
A company with a high return on net
assets ratio, profit margin, or
asset turnover relative to its industry median tends to have
greater mean reversion in these measures.
Meanwhile, TJX's current
ratio (short - term
assets / short - term liabilities) is more than three times
greater.
You will find that many capital intensive industries tend to have
greater debt / equity
ratios as tangible
assets are financed using debt.
Is there a passively managed, low cost (under 0.5 % expense
ratio), broadly diversified ETF that has a share price around $ 25 with
greater than $ 100 million in
assets, so that a new investor could take full advantage of dividend reinvestment?
If the debt
ratio is
greater than 36 %, then lenders are forced to get creative on the loan and start considering additional factors such as credit,
assets and available savings.
If you're looking for a
great Target Retirement Fund, a mutual fund that shifts its
asset allocation over time, you can easily see which one has the lowest expense
ratio.
If the market price of the ETF is
greater than the net
asset value, then it is similar to paying a load on a mutual fund or paying a higher expense
ratio.
Finally, all loans on PeerStreet are backed by a hard
asset (real estate), and the loans typically have a
great loan - to - value
ratio.
Personally, it is
great to choose an international dividend ETF that has higher
assets and a low expense
ratio.
Summing up, we have a
great agricultural investment thesis, we have a reassuring Margin of Safety with a Debt /
Assets ratio of 13 % and an (Adjusted) P / B Ratio of 0.35, we have a deeply invested Owner - Operator, and finally we can calculate a Fair Value (based on 49.656 mio ADS outstanding) of $ 32.66 per share giving us a Upside Potential of 1
ratio of 13 % and an (Adjusted) P / B
Ratio of 0.35, we have a deeply invested Owner - Operator, and finally we can calculate a Fair Value (based on 49.656 mio ADS outstanding) of $ 32.66 per share giving us a Upside Potential of 1
Ratio of 0.35, we have a deeply invested Owner - Operator, and finally we can calculate a Fair Value (based on 49.656 mio ADS outstanding) of $ 32.66 per share giving us a Upside Potential of 189 %.
Traditional debt providers such as large banking institutions are limited in the capacity to refinance commercial debt due to regulations requiring lower LTV
ratios and a continued aversion to the
asset class from the
Great Recession.
The other concerns are also as he mentioned, getting a home mortgage depends on much more than just a
great credit score, you also need good
ratios on your front end (ALL housing expenses incl taxes, ins, etc) and back end
ratios (ALL debt expenses, housing, credit cards, car, etc) so a good income is required, as well as a down payment of some sort (some programs go as low as 3.5 %, others still want 20 %)
Assets can also figure in to this as well, but that's getting away from the bit I know about current lending standards and I don't want to start going off the wrong path here!
It is also in
great financial shape with an equity to
assets ratio of almost 14 and nonperforming
assets that are just 0.73 % of total
assets.