Sentences with phrase «assets given the risk»

Not exact matches

«Given (new CEO Christian Sewing's) background in credit risk and commercial banking it could be seen as a signal of a move from investment banking,» Colin McLean, managing director at SVM Asset Management, told CNBC in an email.

Despite having share prices that move with market prices, these funds can give rise to first - mover advantages for redeeming shareholders and create the potential for destabilizing waves of redemptions and asset fire sales if liquidity buffers and other tools to manage liquidity risk prove insufficient.

Low interest rates have given a huge incentive to shift out of low - risk assets into stocks and corporate bonds in search of higher returns.

The company's methodology includes giving investors a streamlined questionnaire to identify risk tolerance, then employing exchange - traded funds in up to 11 asset classes.

Based on modern portfolio theory and the efficient frontier, return is maximized for a given level of risk through asset class diversification.

However, within a given portfolio, an investor can maximize return for a given level of risk by diversifying among several uncorrelated asset classes.

So do the increase in the mobility of saving and investment; the increase in the desired exposure to foreign assets (the reduction in home bias); the financial market innovation that allows for better diversification and risk sharing; and the differentials in the pace of technology adoption or workplace practices that give rise to varying productivity trends across countries.

Liquidity risk: is a financial risk that can occur when a given financial asset, security, or commodity can not be traded quickly enough in the market to prevent or minimize a loss.

Depending on your future needs and wants, you can determine the correct asset allocation and withdrawal rate that will give you the best chance of minimizing longevity risk.

Offering periodic redemptions rather than daily redemptions gives the fund the opportunity to invest in assets that may be considered more illiquid in nature and higher risk, and therefore more suitable to long - term investors.

Moreover, a sustained move toward higher inflation is a risk to most investors and investment strategies, given that rising inflation has historically been a drag on equity and bond returns, making diversification beyond mainstream asset classes more critical.

Yet bitcoin presents a new set of risks to investors given its limited adoption, a number of massive cybersecurity breaches affecting bitcoin owners and the lack of consistent treatment of the assets by governments.

You can arrive at a reasonable stocks - bonds mix given your investing time horizon and appetite for risk — and see how various blends of stocks and bonds have performed in the past — by completing Vanguard's free risk tolerance - asset allocation questionnaire.

In a Mar. 18 letter to G20 central bankers and finance ministers, Carney gave a low - risk assessment of cryptocurrencies on the basis that the new asset class was small relative to the global financial system.

Aside from acceptable «basis» risk between the stocks we hold long and the indices we use to hedge, and perhaps 1 % of assets in option time - premium at any given time as a result of staggering our strikes to provide a stronger defense, we don't consider various speculative bubbles as threats to our own returns.

BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry, and the company's previously disclosed review of strategic alternatives.

«While ongoing business investment in Canada could spur growth, asset managers will undoubtedly be focusing on maintaining a diversified portfolio and actively managing their risk exposure in the period ahead given evolving macro-economic and political forces around the world.»

Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.

Concentrating in only one or two asset classes could possibly give you higher returns, but you'd also likely see much greater risk, which many investors aren't willing to accept.

Investing solely in such a fund will give exposure only to the one asset class, and thus the risk profile could be pretty high.

And given the unprecedented algorithmic intertwinement of equities and bonds — exemplified by risk parity — pain could ripple quickly, leaving cash and hard assets like commodities and gold the only safe place to retreat.

Even as the Fed has sought to give much clearer signals about its intentions to raise base rates, the performance of US risk assets has continued to improve, suggesting that markets are comfortable with the prospect of a small rise in base rates in December.

Modern Portfolio Theory was developed in the 1950's with the belief that portfolio returns could be maximized for a given amount of investment risk by combining assets in a particular manner.

Given term premium suppression (via QE) reduced volatility and induced investors to buy risky assets to boost returns, a sustained rise in long - term interest rates would give investors more options to achieve yield targets, thus making risk assets appear less attractive and ultimately erode demands for yield and tighten financial conditions.

Given that many retirees live for many years past retirement, having an overly conservative asset allocation means that you risk outliving your assets.

With that definition of risk, the goal of «portfolio optimization» is to find the mix of assets that has the highest expected return, given an investor's tolerance for «risk.»

is & Marcel Darveau — 2010 (2)([email protected]) Keywords: adaptive foraging behaviour, asset - protection principle, behavioural indicator, competition, giving - up density, habitat alteration, habitat selection, Myodes gapperi, Peromyscus maniculatus, predation risk, quitting - harvest rate

An indicator of the depth or liquidity of a market (the ability to buy or sell at or near a given price) and of the use of a market for risk - and / or asset - management.

Given that our crystal balls are opaque for predicting interest rates, I thought it would be interesting to continue my interview with two financial advisors about managing interest rate risk in the municipal bond asset class.

It is tough to manage any asset class while adjusting the risk level to reflect what should not be done in a given era, whether in equities or debt.

If you use an asset - back mortgage (i'm not sure if that is the term, but a mortgage where in the worst case you give your home back to the bank), you generally carry least risk.

My portfolios are the best I know given that the investor understands the likely risk and return of each combination of asset classes, and I work hard to make the risk and return very clear.

You can arrive at a reasonable stocks - bonds mix given your investing time horizon and appetite for risk — and see how various blends of stocks and bonds have performed in the past — by completing Vanguard's free risk tolerance - asset allocation questionnaire.

Asset Allocation is a strategy of dividing your investments and mitigating risks and helps to give you a balanced portfolio of investments.

Alternatively, you could believe that the risk - free rates were correct and that the higher returns you expect on risky assets are appropriate given the volatility you are taking on.

It does not matter about the asset class portfolio you use, each one is expected to reflect different risk and return investment characteristics, and will perform differently in any given market environment.

However, given time and the law of averages, profit opportunities began to fade (the returns on assets tell this story) so they had to go farther out on the risk curve to sustain income growth.

I guess I can try to answer my own question: If you give the goals different risk profiles, you can have a different mix of assets.

Nevertheless, while many believe the Senate would follow through with Rousseff's impeachment, we can not rule out the opposite outcome, which would likely be adverse for risk assets especially given high market expectations.

In my prior post, I gave an overview of the income options available in today's bond market, going over how much yield was available from different asset classes and how to think about the risks that different bond investments carry.

For a new investor with limited experience, investing in a low - cost index fund along with a goal - appropriate asset allocation strategy may give you a better risk - adjusted return than picking specific company stocks.

The prevailing thinking is that given the different risk profiles between the asset classes, the recent level of reward (yield) does not compensate in the current economy.

We understand you can't invest in risk assets and simultaneously protect against both smaller, short - term losses (corrections) and larger, longer - term losses (bear markets) and given the difference in the nature and impacts of corrections versus bear markets, we've chosen to seek protection from the latter.

By spending just 10 to 15 minutes with this risk tolerance - asset - allocation tool, you can come away with a recommended mix of stocks and bonds that can help you invest your retirement savings in a way that makes sense given your tolerance for risk.

In short, your asset allocation should depend on how much risk you're willing to take on any given investment.

Because paper assets give you very little or likely ZERO control over your investment they have the most amount of risk.

Banks take more of a risk by giving out such loans with no asset or property to recover in - case a borrower defaults, which is the main reason why their interests rates a significantly higher.

Find an asset allocation model that fits your age and risk tolerance and choose the investments that will give you that mix.

True risk is not reaching your financial goals in your given investment horizon (much too subjective for generalized mathematical models)- this is the basis for my asset allocation decisions.

To deal with risk, people diversify their investments and develop a mixture of assets that match the risk they think is appropriate given how they plan to use the money.