Not exact matches
Study participants were randomly
assigned to one of two
groups: those who were allowed to drink diet beverages, such
as diet soft drinks, teas and flavoured waters, or those who were in a
control group that drank water only.
In addition, there was no effect on breastfeeding duration when the pacifier was introduced at 1 month of age.280 A more recent systematic review found that the highest level of evidence (ie, from clinical trials) does not support an adverse relationship between pacifier use and breastfeeding duration or exclusivity.281 The association between shortened duration of breastfeeding and pacifier use in observational studies likely reflects a number of complex factors such
as breastfeeding difficulties or intent to wean.281 A large multicenter, randomized
controlled trial of 1021 mothers who were highly motivated to breastfeed were
assigned to 2
groups: mothers advised to offer a pacifier after 15 days and mothers advised not to offer a pacifier.
Study participants were randomly
assigned to one of three treatment
groups for six months: (1) oral estradiol and progesterone at a dose similar to that in many birth
control pills (16 participants); (2) transdermal estradiol, better known
as the estrogen patch, at a physiological replacement dose with cyclic progesterone (13 athletes); or (3) no estrogen (19 subjects).
Outside experts are more cautious, but still impressed, particularly because the work was done
as a randomized
control trial — in which people were randomly
assigned to either an intervention or a
control group.
The youths were randomly
assigned to the program or to a 2 - month waitlist, which served
as a
control group.
For one thing,
as the researchers openly acknowledge, they didnâ $ ™ t conduct a baseline brain scan of the participants before they started the Pay It Forward game, so itâ $ ™ s possible, though unlikely given that participants were randomly
assigned to the gratitude and
control groups, that the participants who performed the gratitude task simply had more neural sensitivity to gratitude already, not because they performed the gratitude task.
For the new study, researchers randomly
assigned 39 nine - month - old babies to be exposed to music or serve
as a
control group.
Members of a separate, exercise
control group at the rehab center,
assigned to complete standard 30 - minute moderate - intensity workout sessions, have been watching wistfully
as the interval trainers leave the lab before them.
In a study of fourth - and fifth - grade students, we found that those randomly
assigned to learn the WWWDOT framework became,
as compared to their pre-test and to a
control group, more aware of the need to evaluate information on the internet for credibility and better able to evaluate the trustworthiness of websites on multiple dimensions (Zhang & Duke, 2011).
Additionally, at the discretion of the DOE, two schools initially
assigned to the treatment
group were moved to the
control group, and four schools initially designated
as control schools were moved to the treatment
group and subsequently voted to participate in the program.
As part of the long - running study on the Abecedarian Project, an intervention program for poor children in North Carolina, researchers have found that children in the program showed fewer symptoms of depression than those who were randomly
assigned to a
control group.
We randomly
assigned groups of students to receive free tickets to see a play or to remain in their school to serve
as the
control.
We will randomly
assign these interventions to teachers who enroll in the study, and will set aside 1 / (X +1) of the teachers to serve
as a
control group.
and 83 percent of the students who were
assigned by lottery to see the play could correctly identify them
as Hamlet's friends, compared to 45 percent of the
control group.
As is the case for the imbalance in the decline - to - participate rates across families
assigned to the
control and treatment
groups, the inclusion in the treatment
group of children not randomly
assigned to treatment nullifies the assumption justified by random assignment of equivalence of the treatment and
control children at the outset of the study.
Adverse weather prevented several school
groups from seeing performances of A Christmas Carol, and we have treated those events
as exogenous and
assigned those
groups to the
control group.
A total of 437 eighth graders were randomly
assigned by classroom to the treatment
group, which utilized the computer game DimensionM
as a supplement to regular classroom instruction, or to the
control group, which received regular class instruction without any computer activities.
Approximately 50 schools recruited in two cohorts will be randomly
assigned; half to receive the program, and half to a «business -
as - usual»
control group.
The schools
assigned to the
control group will continue with instruction
as usual.
To analyze the experimental question data, I modeled state education policy makers» policy preferences (0 = support; 1 = oppose)
as a function of the
control / treatment
group to which they were randomly
assigned.
Barrera - Osorio and his team created three
groups of schools in Cambodia and randomly
assigned one
group as control, one
as providing merit - based aid, one
as providing need - based aid.
Schools will be randomly
assigned, with 50 schools serving
as a
control group and 50 treatment
group schools receiving a principal professional development intervention provided by the University of Washington Center for Educational Leadership.
In the proposed rule, we defined designated record set
as «a
group of records under the
control of a covered entity from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular
assigned to the individual and which is used by the covered entity to make decisions about the individual.»
Individuals Dropbox Business Basic Plus Professional Standard Advanced Enterprise First launched 2008 2008 2017 2011 2017 2015 Number of users 1 user 1 user 1 user 3 + users 3 + users Large deployments Base price ($ USD) per user Free $ 9.99 / month $ 19.99 / month $ 15.00 / month $ 25.00 / month Negotiated pricing $ 99 / year $ 199 / year $ 150 / year $ 240 / year Advanced sharing permissions Version history 30 days 30 days 120 days 120 days 120 days 120 days Smart Sync Showcase Team folders Unlimited API access Paper Storage 2 GB 1 TB 1 TB 2 TB
As much as needed As much as needed Support Basic email support Priority email support Priority chat support Live chat support Business hours phone support 24/7 phone support Assigned account success manager Advanced admin & security features Remote device wipe Remote device wipe Admin console Managed groups Access permissions Account transfer tool HIPAA support Everything in Standard Device approval Audit log Tiered admin roles SSO integration Everything in Advanced EMM Network control Domain insights Integration suppo
As much
as needed As much as needed Support Basic email support Priority email support Priority chat support Live chat support Business hours phone support 24/7 phone support Assigned account success manager Advanced admin & security features Remote device wipe Remote device wipe Admin console Managed groups Access permissions Account transfer tool HIPAA support Everything in Standard Device approval Audit log Tiered admin roles SSO integration Everything in Advanced EMM Network control Domain insights Integration suppo
as needed
As much as needed Support Basic email support Priority email support Priority chat support Live chat support Business hours phone support 24/7 phone support Assigned account success manager Advanced admin & security features Remote device wipe Remote device wipe Admin console Managed groups Access permissions Account transfer tool HIPAA support Everything in Standard Device approval Audit log Tiered admin roles SSO integration Everything in Advanced EMM Network control Domain insights Integration suppo
As much
as needed Support Basic email support Priority email support Priority chat support Live chat support Business hours phone support 24/7 phone support Assigned account success manager Advanced admin & security features Remote device wipe Remote device wipe Admin console Managed groups Access permissions Account transfer tool HIPAA support Everything in Standard Device approval Audit log Tiered admin roles SSO integration Everything in Advanced EMM Network control Domain insights Integration suppo
as needed Support Basic email support Priority email support Priority chat support Live chat support Business hours phone support 24/7 phone support
Assigned account success manager Advanced admin & security features Remote device wipe Remote device wipe Admin console Managed
groups Access permissions Account transfer tool HIPAA support Everything in Standard Device approval Audit log Tiered admin roles SSO integration Everything in Advanced EMM Network
control Domain insights Integration support
In a randomized
control trial, 659 sixth and seventh grade African - American male and female adolescents, mean age 11.8, were stratified by gender and age and randomly
assigned to receive one of three 8 - hour curricula: an abstinence curriculum, a safer sex curriculum or a health promotion curriculum (which served
as the
control group).
Abuse and the media / Abuse or neglect / Abused children / Acceptance (1) / Acceptance (2) / Activities (1) / Activities (2) / Activities (3) / Activities (4) / Activities (5) / Activity / Activity
groups / Activity planning / Activity programming / AD / HD approaches / Adhesive Learners / Admissions planning / Adolescence (1) / Adolescence (2) / Adolescent abusers / Adolescent male sexual abusers / Adolescent sexual abusers / Adolescent substance abuse / Adolescents and substance abuse / Adolescents in residential care / Adult attention / Adult attitudes / Adult tasks and treatment provision / Adultism / Adults
as enemies / Adults on the team (50 years ago) / Advocacy / Advocacy — children and parents / Affiliation of rejected youth / Affirmation / After residential care / Aggression (1) / Aggression (2) / Aggression (3) / Aggression (4) / Aggression and counter-aggression / Aggression replacement training / Aggression in youth / Aggressive behavior in schools / Aggressive / researchers / AIDS orphans in Uganda / Al Trieschman / Alleviation of stress / Alternative discipline / Alternatives to residential care / Altruism / Ambiguity / An apprenticeship of distress / An arena for learning / An interventive moment / Anger in a disturbed child / Antisocial behavior / Anxiety (1) / Anxiety (2) / Anxious anxiety / Anxious children / Appointments: The panel interview / Approach / Approach to family work / Art / Art of leadership / Arts for offenders / Art therapy (1) / Art therapy (2) / Art therapy (3) / A.S. Neill / Assaultive incidents / Assessing strengths / Assessment (1) / Assessment (2) / Assessment (3) / Assessment and planning / Assessment and treatment / Assessments / Assessment of problems / Assessment with care /
Assign appropriate responsibility / Assisting transition / «At - risk» / / Attachment (1) / Attachment (2) / Attachment (3) / Attachment (4) / Attachment and attachment behavior / Attachment and autonomy / Attachment and loss / Attachment and placed children / Attachment issue / Attachment representations / Attachment: Research and practice / Attachment with staff / Attention giving and receiving / Attention seeking / Attitude
control / Authority (1) / Authority (2) / Authority,
control and respect / Awareness (1) / Awareness (2)
This trial had a sample of 28 rural towns and small cities («communities») located in Iowa and Pennsylvania, each of which contained one school district with one high school and one or more middle schools.6 The communities were
grouped into matched pairs based on school district size and geographic location, and then one member of each pair was randomly
assigned to participate in PROSPER and the other to continue school and community services
as usual (i.e., the
control group).
As reported previously in greater detail, 3 — 5 within each randomization site, newborns were
assigned randomly, in blocks of 4, to intervention or
control groups of ∼ 200 newborns each, by using sealed envelopes provided to sites by the evaluation team.
Tang et al. (2007) had an experimental
group do 5 days of integrative body — mind training (including mindfulness meditation
as one component) while a
control group was
assigned to relaxation training.
Children were matched on characteristics such
as tribal heritage, school, grade level, and teacher ratings and then randomly
assigned to either the 2 - phase FAST program or the non-FAST
control group.
MIT using bibliotherapy was chosen
as a comparison
group because: (a) it seemed inappropriate to withhold treatment by
assigning children to wait - list
groups when the efficacy of moderately intensive parent training is well - established; (b) comparisons to alternative treatments provide stronger tests of treatment efficacy than do comparisons to untreated
controls; and (c) WLC cause problems in assessing outcomes because WLCs generate a disproportionate number of dropouts that are difficult to address in «completer» analyses (Werba et al., 2006).
For example, in our longitudinal, multi-site study of adolescents at risk for depression, we found that teens who participated in a
group cognitive - behavioral prevention program were less likely to experience a depressive disorder at nine -(Garber et al., 2009) and 32 -(Beardslee et al., in press) months follow - up, relative to at - risk teens who were
assigned to a treatment -
as - usual
control group.
Participants were randomly
assigned to a parent training intervention or a
control group receiving services
as usual.
Methods: Twenty patients with unipolar depression were recruited and randomly
assigned into two
groups (1: intervention, exercise program, n = 14; 2:
control, treatment -
as - usual, n = 6).
As illustrated in Figure 1, in this cluster randomized
controlled field trial, HCMO randomly
assigned the eight school divisions to either a treatment
group that received ROE in the 2002 — 2003 school year (ROE1; 445 students) or a wait - list
control group (315 students).
There were three randomly -
assigned conditions — an opportunity to use our staff
as consultants once a year (the
control group), a couples
group that emphasized parent - child relationships during the open - ended part of the evenings (the more traditional approach), or a couples
group that focused more on the relationship between the parents during the open - ended parts.
Half of the schools were randomly
assigned to an intervention
group; the other half served
as the
control group.
Using an intent - to - treat (ITT) design, multivariate regressions suggest that females from families randomly
assigned to intervention in early childhood scored lower than those in the
control condition on perceptions of dating violence
as normative, beliefs about IPV prevalence, exposure to IPV in their own peer
group, and expected sanction behaviors for IPV perpetration and victimization.