These plots can be
assigned by community groups.
Not exact matches
7 In a departure from random assignment, two
communities assigned to the PROSPER
group withdrew from the study during its first year and were replaced
by two other
communities that year — a substitution that could potentially have undermined the equivalence of the PROSPER and control
communities and led to inaccurate findings.
The program's effects are being studied
by examining 610 families who were randomly
assigned to a program
group, which received the enhanced two - generational program, or to a control
group, which could only access alternative services in the
community.
In this evaluation of the Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care — Adolescents (MTFC — A) program conducted
by Chamberlain and Reid (1998), 85 boys referred for
community placement in the juvenile justice system were randomly
assigned to either MTFC — A or
Group Care (GC).
In the original study, 79 male juvenile offenders ages 12 to 18 who had been designated for out - of - home placement
by the juvenile court were randomly
assigned to two conditions: (1) placement in Treatment Foster Care (TFC) or (2) placement in other
community group care programs.