Sentences with phrase «association intervened in the case»

«This was was enough of a concern that the IP professionals association intervened in the case on this issue,» says Courage.

Not exact matches

The news comes as the British Humanist Association (BHA) has announced that it is applying to intervene in an appeal to Tony Nicklinson's right - to - die case,

The news comes as the British Humanist Association (BHA) has announced that it is applying to intervene in an appeal to Tony Nicklinson's right - to - die case, and a day after the BHA released the results of a new survey showing 81 % of adults support a change in the law.

The British Humanist Association (BHA) are intervening in support of Paul's legal case, and welcomes the brave step he has taken in revealing his identity.

Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel Abelove has asked the state district attorneys association to join him in challenging the constitutionality of Cuomo's executive order giving the state attorney general the authority to intervene in cases involving fatal encounters between police and unarmed civilians.

The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) on Wednesday filed a motion for leave to intervene in a case brought by several Democratic attorneys general looking to reverse the FCC's December decisions to overturn the rules.

While the Canadian Bar Association is usually busy intervening in court cases, making submissions to government, commenting on proposed legislation and supporting members, it's not every day that the CBA is called upon to help the public understand the nuances of a pressing national issue which raises concerns about the rule of law.

In 2003, West Coast LEAF applied to intervene in this case in coalition with the Trial Lawyers Association of BC and the BC Coalition of People with DisabilitieIn 2003, West Coast LEAF applied to intervene in this case in coalition with the Trial Lawyers Association of BC and the BC Coalition of People with Disabilitiein this case in coalition with the Trial Lawyers Association of BC and the BC Coalition of People with Disabilitiein coalition with the Trial Lawyers Association of BC and the BC Coalition of People with Disabilities.

On August 27, 1983, the Executive Committee of the Association passed a resolution authorizing the Association to seek leave from the Supreme Court of Canada to intervene in this case and to instruct counsel accordingly.

On August 13, 1983 the National Council of Representatives passed a resolution authorizing the Association to seek leave from the Supreme Court of Canada to intervene in this case and to instruct counsel accordingly.

The People's Challenge to the Government regarding Brexit raised # 170,550 and Joint Enterprise: Not Guilty by Association (JENGbA) raised over # 10,000 to allow them to successfully intervene in the Supreme Court case of R v Jogee [2016] UKSC.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CCLA CALLS ON FEDERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES TO RECOGNIZE THEIR DUTY TO UPHOLD THE CHARTER AND PROMISE TO ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY IN LAW - MAKING Ottawa, ON — Last week, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) intervened in the Federal Court case of Schmidt v. Attorney General of Canada, arguing that (1) the government has a responsibility to -LSB-..IN LAW - MAKING Ottawa, ON — Last week, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) intervened in the Federal Court case of Schmidt v. Attorney General of Canada, arguing that (1) the government has a responsibility to -LSB-..in the Federal Court case of Schmidt v. Attorney General of Canada, arguing that (1) the government has a responsibility to -LSB-...]

He acted for the Consumers» Association in Burgess v Office of Fair Trading [2005] CAT 25, the first case in which the Consumers» Association intervened in an appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal and for the claimant in Network Multimedia Television Ltd v Jobserve Ltd, the first case in which a UK court granted an interim injunction to restrain a contravention of the Chapter II prohibition under the Competition Act 1998.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which intervened in the case at the top court, is concerned about the dangers of uncritically relying on novel science as admissible, key expert evidence.

The real property section of the Ontario Bar Association, with the support of Land Registry Ontario and its Director of Titles, had intervened in the case.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

The Ontario Bar Association decided that the case was important enough for it to intervene in the appeal.

The Ontario Bar Association (and, through it, Land Registry Ontario) intervened in the case.

For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed arguments without social science evidence to back them up; nor could the court take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the arguments.

The Canadian Bar Association, which is intervening in the case, is trying to navigate a middle course between the sides, Jamal said.

The Competition Tribunal has set June 30 to hear motions for leave to intervene in the Commissioner of Competition v. Canadian Real Estate Association case.