Sentences with phrase «assumed as outcomes»

No mention here of management, release of creativity, culture, instinct... all assumed as outcomes.

Not exact matches

As Donald Trump assumes the mantle of 45th president of the United States, much of the mainstream press is going through a soul - searching process, trying to understand how it got the outcome of the election so thoroughly wrong — and also how to survive under what is likely to be one of the most media - hostile administrations in recent memory.

Luke was not like the modern secular historian, and therefore we should not think of him as such, nor should we tacitly assume that his writings were the outcome of modern methods.

An evolutionary perspective is assumed in which human existence is seen as the outcome of a long process of development whose beginnings are lost in the distant past.

Unless one assumes a determinism or a theory of creativity that claims creative outcomes are predictable in principle, there is nothing that fully (reductively) accounts for what appears as the new intelligibility of the new form or the newly transformed intelligible outcome — the new continuity.

Arsene Wenger was interviewed in the tunnel as soon as the game was over, and I think it is safe to assume he was quite pleased with the outcome.

Most people assume they that homebirth can not possibly be as safe as hospital birth or they naively think that appropriate preparation for managing unexpected outcomes is unnecessary.

Like all parallel medical services, it falls to the patient to figure out who is legitimately skilled and who is not: EXCEPT, most women having babies are in their twenties and early thirties and I personally didn't have the kind of life - experience necessary to question whether or not my government would provide me with sub par care and just assumed that if the government was paying, it must be safe, and the midwifery community capitalizes on this by running advertisements (which OB / GYN are not permitted to do) advertising themselves as being less interventionist, less c - section (no shit, Sherlock, but you'd have to read between the lines to understand why), and better outcomes.

«I'd say the bottom line is that it probably has some positive effect on breastfeeding outcomes, but not as much as we have been assuming it does.»

As a point of comparison, the average person is only willing to pay a dollar to avoid a one in ten million chance of death, so assuming you value your survival over the outcome of the Presidential election, the von Neumann - Morgenstern rationality axioms state that it's irrational to vote if it costs more than a dollar to do so (for instance in terms of gas costs and the cost of your time).

DeRosa used a computer to simulate what might happen if 1,000 people each tossed a coin 10,000 times, assuming a certain outcome — such as tails — was equivalent to a win and the number of times a particular person won the toss was random.

It has its benefits, however, as it decreases leaders» assumed power to punish — a power base that negatively affects leadership outcomes.

Furthermore, given that there are more than 10 million Medicare hospitalizations due to medical conditions in the United States annually and assuming that the association between sex and mortality is causal, we estimate that approximately 32000 fewer patients would die if male physicians could achieve the same outcomes as female physicians every year.43 The effect would be even larger if the associations between physician sex and patient outcomes also hold for non-Medicare populations.

The problem, as I've pointed out in several pieces now, is that in using tests for these purposes we are assuming that if we can change test scores, we will change later outcomes in life.

A growth mindset culture is developing within the school as the school community assumes a collective responsibility for student outcomes.

As well, although self - assessment does lead to many positive outcomes, those outcomes can't be assumed; the quality of the self - assessment process (how it's taught and how it's executed) is what distinguishes productive from counter-productive experiences.

Performing an embedded LTI launch, assuming it is supported by the particular Reading Eco-system, involves performing a similar operation as reportScores with a single exception: while some implementations of outcomes might allow the results to be enqueued there is no equivalent meaning to delaying an LTI launch.

Using multiple option positions, we can further demonstrate a complex strategy to target specific outcomes, such as a strategy wishing to participate up to 3x of upside (with a cap) while limiting downside losses to only 1x (assuming the underlying security price is 100).

Based on this information it seems abundantly clear that dogs should be held at least three days, but likely not more than 5 days, because as time passes, the likelihood of a dog's owner being found diminish rapidly and dogs end up assuming space in a shelter with very little opportunity for any potential outcome until the stray hold is up.

I also remember Myles in a rather vivid phrase saying that we had to remember that we could still take actions to avert the worst warming and that we shouldn't assume «that our children will stand by and watch as the seas boil around them», showing that the worst case wasn't necessarily the most likely outcome.

I think that only a moral relativist could object to the above, as it would require arguing that it is wrong to assume simply because the scientist in my story does not wish to burn alive that they presume you would also value this outcome.

We expect 3 degrees but might get 4.5 — of course, we could also get as «little» as 2, but we are ignoring the vast majority of possible outcomes if we assume (or hope) that we will «only» get 2 degrees.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

Max, obtaining positive feedback as a model outcome is quite different from assuming it.

If we assume two complementary hypotheses H0 and H1, an experimental outcome O, know P (O H0) and P (O H1), and have an assumed prior probability ratio P (H0) / P (H1), we can calculate the posterior probability as follows: P (H0 O) / P (H1 O) = (P (O H0) / P (O H1)-RRB-(P (H0) / P (H1)-RRB- Take logs to convert that multiplication to an addition log (P (H0 O) / P (H1 O)-RRB- = log (P (O H0) / P (O H1)-RRB- + log (P (H0) / P (H1)-RRB- and we interpret this as the confidence in H0 over H1 after the observation is equal to the evidence inherent in the result of the experiment plus our confidence before the observation.

Third, in light of both cases» outcomes, it would nevertheless be wrong to assume that, as a consequence of those judgments, Uber can not benefit from or be regulated by European Union law.

For this discussion I am assuming a civil litigation practice, as civil litigation matters have clear monetary outcomes where it is possible to win or lose.

Not only was this requirement irrelevant to the merits of Rankin's motion before the Commission but, because it called for the Commission to make a determination, as at that time, of the likely outcome of a future hearing, first assuming that Rankin did not have the undisclosed information and then comparing it on the assumption that he did, it was unworkable.

Assuming a drop - out rate from the trial of approximately 20 %; this sample size was sufficient to detect a standardised effect size of 0.4 at 85 % power and α of 0.05 in the primary outcome measure if there was no clustering and a standardised effect size of 0.6 allowing for clustering by course with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.178 or less; for this sample size calculation, we conservatively imagined clustering within control families as well as intervention families.

This can be contrasted to an approach that assumes negotiations will occur and allows discussions around whether outcomes can include a consent determination or not to be resolved as part of that process.

The assumption that experiences at home affect behavior or adjustment in other contexts also causes researchers to overlook the fact that family misfortunes such as divorce have repercussions on children's lives outside the home and to assume that adverse outcomes are the results of experiences at home.

This assumption has underlain the investment of many home visitation programs in family - level changes in areas such as maternal mental health, family planning, partner violence, parental workforce participation, and similar outcomes.2, 5 — 7 Although it has been assumed frequently that family - level change is a prerequisite to child - level change, relatively few studies have compared program effects for family - level and child - level outcomes.

This aggregation was done using the mean of the outcomes, which assumes dependence between them, as was typical of our data.

If some primary studies report an outcome as a dichotomous measure and others use a continuous measure of the same construct, we will convert results for the former from an OR to a SMD, provided that we can assume the underlying continuous measure has approximately a normal or logistic distribution (otherwise we will perform two separate analyses).

PMTO is based on the Social Interaction Learning (SIL) model, which assumes that contextual factors, such as socio - economic disadvantage and parental psychopathology, have a negative impact on child outcomes by undermining parenting quality (Snyder and Patterson 1995).

wiil be the same as before, when these proposals were initially floated; ergo, we must assume therefore that the outcomes will be the same... a ram - rod acceptance of initial initiatives.

Copyright © 2010 North San Diego Real Estate Investors Association, Inc. - All Rights Reserved - NSDREI, its officers and directors, individually or collectively assume no liability or responsibility for the outcome of any real estate transaction, decision, or other action that any NSDREI member, guest, or visitor may enter into as the result of attending any meeting of NSDREI, listening to any guest speaker, or talking to any NSDREI member, guest, visitor, or persons listed on NSDREI's website, or of following the educational content in any of the resources in the library.