Sentences with phrase «assumed average growth rate»

CIBC World Markets analyst Robert Sedran lifted the assumed average growth rate for the sector in fiscal 2018 from seven per cent to nine per cent, «turning what was already expected to be a good year into a better one.»

Assuming the average growth rate of the S&P 500 remains the same, your investment could double after just 7 years.

Not exact matches

Because low - risk investments return roughly 20 % on average in a country with 20 % nominal GDP growth, financial repression means that the benefits of growth are unfairly distributed between savers (who get just the deposit rate, say 3 %), banks, who get the spread between the lending and the deposit rate (say 3.5 %) and the borrower, who gets everything else (13.5 % in this case, assuming he takes little risk — even more if he takes risk).

Given existing U.S. demographics, even if we assume an unemployment rate in 2024 of just 4 %, civilian employment would reach 157.2 million jobs in 2024, resulting in an average annual growth rate for civilian employment of just 0.4 % annually over the coming 8 years.

Finally, if we assume a sustained explosion in productivity growth to 2.8 % annually, joining the highest quintile of historical U.S. productivity growth rates for any 8 - year period, and assuming an unemployment rate of just 4 % in 2024, the result would still be real U.S. GDP growth averaging just 3.2 % annually over the next 8 years.

If I assume a dividend growth rate of 6 percent (about the long - run average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically averaged about 4 percent), the expected nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.

Now, finally, the stock market is fairly - valued for conditions of low inflation and low interest rates (assuming average long - term economic growth in the future).

We have assumed that home prices will increase at the historical average growth rate over the past 20 years.

Growth varies from year to year annually but it is assumed to have an average rate consistent with hitting the government's inflation target.

Of course you have to look at these in great detail, but what that means for 2050, when I worked out the numbers, assuming our world population of 8 or 9 billion in the year 2050, is that if this world economic growth rate continues to 2050 the way it has been in the past 30 years, you get an average person in the world in 2050 being like today's average European or Japanese.

A single $ 1,000 IRA contribution made at age 10, for example, could grow to $ 11,467 over 50 years, assuming a conservative 5 % average annual growth rate.

If I assume a dividend growth rate of 6 percent (about the long - run average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically averaged about 4 percent), the expected nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.

This is assuming the earnings growth rate going forward is 7.2 percent (i.e., comparable to its long - term historical average of 7.41 percent) and interest rates remain at the current all - time low levels.

4.1 Trace Gases Scenario A assumes that growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the 1970s and 1980s will continue indefinitely; the assumed annual growth averages about 1.5 % of current emissions, so the net greenhouse forcing increasese xponentially.»

Scenario A assumes that growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the 1970s and 1980s - will continue indefinitely; the assumed annual growth averages about 1.5 % of current emissions, so the net greenhouse forcing increases exponentially.

We assume that between 2005 and 2012 the economy grew at 2.5 % (on par with recent economist and CBO estimates of potential GDP growth), the energy - intensity of the economy declined by 1.9 % a year (the average annual rate between 1990 and 2005), and the energy mix (and thus carbon - intensity of energy supply) remained constant.

Without this drastic USA cutback, IPCC estimates that we will reach 600 ppmv CO2 by 2100 (average of cases B1 and A1T, both assuming no special «climate initiatives», population growth rate slowing down reaching 10.5 billion by 2100, with medium and fast economic growth rate).