I erroneously
assumed everyone reads minds and would telepathically infer I was only referring to regular soy milk in this post.
I'm going to
assume everyone reading this is aware of the Klopp years at Dortmund.
It is safe to
assume everyone reading this knows what happened 10 years ago in the United States.
Not exact matches
In my experience, a great mind - set for writing sales copy that doesn't appear too assertive is to
assume that
everyone reading your copy doesn't want to do what you what them to do!
«I looked around, did some
reading, and the men's accessories market seemed like the obvious place to invest because there has just been so much of growth,» says Barclay, joking, «I remember when if you wore a pink shirt,
everyone assumed you were gay.»
And sometimes we use words that we're not clear on... we use them because they're always used but the meaning is
assumed by us and
everyone else because we
read and hear them and use them without thinking about them.
I saw how much spiritual benefit I received from
reading and studying Scripture and theology, and I
assumed that
everyone else would get just as much benefit from these practices as I had.
Maybe Kimball
assumes that
everyone has
read N.T. Wright, rediscovered the significance of the kingdom message of Jesus, and re-framed the mission of the church as being one that should benefit the world, but when I tell people around here that I think God has a plan to redeem and restore the entire creation right here on earth, I get called a heretic.
Assuming that
everyone will
read it and reach the same conclusions you did is reaching.
You've just listed his stats and basically told
everyone reading to
assume they're good.
But in the new paradigm, we can't
assume that
everyone wants to
read the same paper every day — we have to treat each member like a beautiful unique snowflake and respond to their interests as expressed by which emails they open,
read and act on.
Anyone who doesn't realize that the authorship is honorary — that is, almost
everyone who
reads the paper — will wrongly
assume that this well - known scientist has performed his or her role in ensuring the integrity of the data.
Anyone with the ability to
read - which I
assume is the vast majority of the OkCupid userbase - should have known long ago about the little quirk that's been getting
everyone's goat this week.
The first is that it
assumes everyone wants to
read e-books.
B&N (and I
assume everyone else in the ebook reader biz) came up with the two months based on 30 minutes of speedy
reading a day.
So if we need 100 people to take action for a promotion to work, we'd need a minimum of 1250 subscribers — and that's
assuming that
everyone who opened our email would
read it and then take action.
I am
assuming everyone has
read $ 500 Visa Gift Cards are Back at Office Depot!
I haven't
read the rest of this thread because it's so stupid, so I'll just
assume that
everyone else is explaining why it's wrong.
Now, it seems like the ethical thing to do is not to
read illegally copied material, even if there's no law to stop you (especially as they might accuse you of being the one to have copied them — however, for the purposes of the question, if possible, try not to turn this into a matter of getting prosecuted because someone thinks you copied the material that you didn't copy; for the purposes of this question,
assume everyone in the world knows, believes and acts like you're not the one who copied it, impractical as that might seem).
I'm going to go out on a limb here and
assume that most
everyone reading this is familiar with Siri, Cortana, and Google Assistant.
Don't
assume that the person
reading your resume knows every company on your resume; even if
everyone knows what AT&T is, they don't necessarily know your department!