Sentences with phrase «assumed everyone reads»

I erroneously assumed everyone reads minds and would telepathically infer I was only referring to regular soy milk in this post.
I'm going to assume everyone reading this is aware of the Klopp years at Dortmund.
It is safe to assume everyone reading this knows what happened 10 years ago in the United States.

Not exact matches

In my experience, a great mind - set for writing sales copy that doesn't appear too assertive is to assume that everyone reading your copy doesn't want to do what you what them to do!
«I looked around, did some reading, and the men's accessories market seemed like the obvious place to invest because there has just been so much of growth,» says Barclay, joking, «I remember when if you wore a pink shirt, everyone assumed you were gay.»
And sometimes we use words that we're not clear on... we use them because they're always used but the meaning is assumed by us and everyone else because we read and hear them and use them without thinking about them.
I saw how much spiritual benefit I received from reading and studying Scripture and theology, and I assumed that everyone else would get just as much benefit from these practices as I had.
Maybe Kimball assumes that everyone has read N.T. Wright, rediscovered the significance of the kingdom message of Jesus, and re-framed the mission of the church as being one that should benefit the world, but when I tell people around here that I think God has a plan to redeem and restore the entire creation right here on earth, I get called a heretic.
Assuming that everyone will read it and reach the same conclusions you did is reaching.
You've just listed his stats and basically told everyone reading to assume they're good.
But in the new paradigm, we can't assume that everyone wants to read the same paper every day — we have to treat each member like a beautiful unique snowflake and respond to their interests as expressed by which emails they open, read and act on.
Anyone who doesn't realize that the authorship is honorary — that is, almost everyone who reads the paper — will wrongly assume that this well - known scientist has performed his or her role in ensuring the integrity of the data.
Anyone with the ability to read - which I assume is the vast majority of the OkCupid userbase - should have known long ago about the little quirk that's been getting everyone's goat this week.
The first is that it assumes everyone wants to read e-books.
B&N (and I assume everyone else in the ebook reader biz) came up with the two months based on 30 minutes of speedy reading a day.
So if we need 100 people to take action for a promotion to work, we'd need a minimum of 1250 subscribers — and that's assuming that everyone who opened our email would read it and then take action.
I am assuming everyone has read $ 500 Visa Gift Cards are Back at Office Depot!
I haven't read the rest of this thread because it's so stupid, so I'll just assume that everyone else is explaining why it's wrong.
Now, it seems like the ethical thing to do is not to read illegally copied material, even if there's no law to stop you (especially as they might accuse you of being the one to have copied them — however, for the purposes of the question, if possible, try not to turn this into a matter of getting prosecuted because someone thinks you copied the material that you didn't copy; for the purposes of this question, assume everyone in the world knows, believes and acts like you're not the one who copied it, impractical as that might seem).
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that most everyone reading this is familiar with Siri, Cortana, and Google Assistant.
Don't assume that the person reading your resume knows every company on your resume; even if everyone knows what AT&T is, they don't necessarily know your department!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z