A Betterment account with the same amount of money is $ 260 — a much better deal,
assuming equal rates of return.
Not exact matches
For LTV, our mortgage
rate averages
assume a value of 80 % —
equal to a down payment of 20 %.
They then
assume that future budgets will
equal the current budget times the inflation
rate times the population growth
rate.
For the relationship between dividends and the equity risk premium, they
assume the difference between dividend - price ratio and risk - free
rate equals equity risk premium minus expected dividend growth
rate.
1
Assuming the Fed trims the balance sheet by approximately $ 1.5 trillion, and that quantitative easing and quantitative tightening are reasonably symmetric in their effect on treasury yields (which may or may not be the case), you could surmise that all things being
equal, long - term
rates will react by rising around 35 basis points in the coming years.
Economists
assume that lower interest
rates increase business investment — all else
equal.
This calculator
assumes that the interest
rate remains constant throughout the life of the loan and that the loan will be repaid in
equal monthly installments.
So that means that
assuming that all of those things are
equal in the men in this study, that higher animal protein intake led to higher
rates of heart disease.
DCPS» graduation
rate of 73.2 percent in 2016 - 17 is above the 71.6 percent
rate that would be necessary to meet this goal
assuming equal progress each year.
So
assuming those are pro
rates for getting your book edited, covered, formatted, and distributed as ebook and print on demand, the questions you should ask yourself is IF a publisher is asking for $ 800 up front from you are: — is the percentage they take of your work going to
equal more than that other $ 800?
For Vogue, and many other consumer magazines, the revenue currently being generated by their digital editions has yet to even
equal that of one full - page ad (
assuming it is sold at
rate card
rates).
In general, bond prices are inversely correlated with market interest
rates — so if I'm holding a bond portfolio and market interest
rates go up, then my portfolio will decrease in value
assuming all else is held
equal.
In the differential inflation approach, using the US dollar risk - free
rate as the starting point, you are
assuming a global real risk free
rate, set
equal to that
rate embedded in the US treasury bond
rate as the base for all local currency risk free
rates.
Duration is a linear measure, meaning it
assumes that for a certain percentage of change in interest
rates, an
equal percentage change in price will occur.
If you
assume that the lowest Historical Surviving Withdrawal
Rate equals the Safe Withdrawal
Rate, you will conclude that it is best to have a high stock allocation (close to 80 %) and that the 30 - year Safe Withdrawal
Rate is 4 % of the original balance (plus inflation).
«Bottom line is, any debt that isn't deductible, should be paid off before you pay off the debt that is deductible,
assuming the
rates are
equal,» Tobias said.
For LTV, our mortgage
rate averages
assume a value of 80 % —
equal to a down payment of 20 %.
If your nest egg upon retirement is
equal to 12 times that income, or $ 1.2 million, you could reasonably withdraw $ 48,000 in the first year of retirement,
assuming a 4 % portfolio withdrawal
rate.
For our student loans, accrued interest capitalizes at the start of the repayment period - since we do not charge fees, and
assuming you make all your scheduled payments on time, the repayment period APR will be
equal to the interest
rate.
As Ardrey points out, you
assume that the
rate of return will be
equal to the mortgage
rate to break even, but that's not the case.
Assume a goal pot of # 500,000 that is a saving
rate of # 50,000 pa, a # 1m pot
equals a saving
rate of # 100,000 pa etc. maybe I am greedy but I wouldn't feel comfortable with a goal pot of less than # 2m plus house owned mortgage free.
When you
assume zero stock price growth in a period when both earnings and dividends are increasing, then the P / E ratio is being
assumed to decrease at a
rate equal to the earnings growth
rate, and the dividend yield is
assumed to steadily increase.
We
assume that the retiree has withdrawn an initial amount
equal to one - twelfth of the targeted withdrawal
rate at the market closing price of the previous month.
For planning purposes,
assume that the sum of the initial dividend yield and the annual NOMINAL dividend growth
rate equals a constant.
If we
assume that the risk - free
rate is a 3 - month US Treasury (10 - year US Treasury is also common) and
equal to 1.50 %, the portfolio beta is 1.60 (60 % more systematic risk or volatility than the benchmark), the benchmark has returned 10 % annualized, and the portfolio return is 20 %, we have:
Now,
assuming that all other conditions are
equal (say 7 % growth for all classes, the same marginal tax
rate, the same withholding tax abroad etc.) it would be interesting to
rate all the combination of «class x holding».
The Prime
Rate + 1.24 % rate is available for customers opening home equity lines of credit for $ 50,000 or greater and meeting product credit qualifications covered below and assumes less than or equal to 80 % Combined Loan to Value (CL
Rate + 1.24 %
rate is available for customers opening home equity lines of credit for $ 50,000 or greater and meeting product credit qualifications covered below and assumes less than or equal to 80 % Combined Loan to Value (CL
rate is available for customers opening home equity lines of credit for $ 50,000 or greater and meeting product credit qualifications covered below and
assumes less than or
equal to 80 % Combined Loan to Value (CLTV).
(
Assuming the above growth rate, equal performance and assuming no increase or decrease in REZ's expense ratio — see our expense ratio calculator page to see how all this is cal
Assuming the above growth
rate,
equal performance and
assuming no increase or decrease in REZ's expense ratio — see our expense ratio calculator page to see how all this is cal
assuming no increase or decrease in REZ's expense ratio — see our expense ratio calculator page to see how all this is calculated)
Assuming interest
rates are constant the forward price of the futures is
equal to the forward price of the forward contract with the same strike and maturity.
If you simplify and
assume that the safe withdrawal
rate and interest
rate on savings are
equal, then you get this very simple formula:
Edit: Assumptions that usually land me in hot water are: long term
rates at 4 % to 5 %, salary adjustments of ~ 4 % per year up to a cap (a cap
equal to what a senior person in my industry is paid, has mimicked my salary raises surprisingly well actually), I
assume a 20 % tax
rate on earnings averaged over all accounts, then I seek to replace an «inflation» adjusted 100K at ~ 1.5 % per year (my real goal would be a CPI adjusted 100K into the future, which very likely would not be driven by inflation, but no one has one of those crystal balls).
Thus, the compound annual growth
rate of your three - year investment is
equal to 24.93 %, representing the smoothed annualized gain you earned over your investment time horizon,
assuming your investment was compounding over the three - year time period.
All other conditions taken as
equal, i.e.,
assuming the proportion between interest and total profit to be more or less constant, the functioning capitalist is able and willing to pay a higher or lower interest directly proportional to the level of the
rate of profit.
Assuming an individual's marginal tax
rate remains constant (factoring clawback of income test benefits), mathematically, the RRSP and TFSA are
equal (i.e., your after - tax income in a RRSP will be equivalent to what you would earn in a TFSA).
I'll address the assumption that past capital gains
equal future capital gains in another blog post, but the
assumed interest
rate numbers alone make me squeamish.
Fidelity's suggested total pretax savings goal of 15 % of annual income (including employer contributions) is based on our research, which indicates that most people would need to contribute this amount from an
assumed starting age of 25 through an
assumed retirement age of 67 to potentially support a replacement annual income
rate equal to 45 % of preretirement annual income (
assuming no pension income) through age 93.
** The authors also fall into the familiar trap of
assuming that the trapping
rate for lethal control purposes — whatever it is — is
equal to that of a TNR (or even TVHR) program.
Reservations canceled within sixty days prior to the date of your arrival incur a fee
equal to the entire rental amount less a refund (up to your nightly
rate) for those nights we are able to re-rent the condo IF we are indeed able to re-rent the condo (note the administrative cancellation fee will nonetheless apply) Please note that we do not
assume financial responsibility for any cancellations due to unexpected circumstances.
However, if we know the first card has a 2.5 % rewards
rate, then we can confidently say it is better than a 2 % cash back card —
assuming all other things are
equal.
Depending on the lapse
rate in the stratosphere, the hill in the downward flux could reverse at some point, particularly if their is a large negative lapse
rate in the base of the stratosphere — but I don't think this tends to be the case; anyway, let's
assume that the CO2 valley in the TRPP net upward flux only deepens until it saturates at zero (it saturates at zero because at that point the upward and downward spectral fluxes at the center of the band are
equal to the blackbody value for the temperature at TRPP).
-- What's the mean avg growth in global CO2 and CO2e last year and over the prior ~ 5 years — What's the current global surface temperature anomaly in the last year and in prior ~ 5 years — project that mean avg growth in CO2 / CO2e ppm increasing at the same
rate for another decade, and then to 2050 and to 2075 (or some other set of years)-- then using the best available latest GCM / s (pick and stick) for each year or quarter update and calculate the «likely» global surface temperature anomaly into the out years — all things being
equal and not
assuming any «fictional» scenarios in any RCPs or Paris accord of some massive shift in projected FF / Cement use until such times as they are a reality and actually operating and actually seen slowing CO2 ppm growth.
Knowing from the Waste Characterization Study (26) that 41 % by weight and 44 percent by volume is the paper fiber portion of the waste stream at Hoffman Road, and then
assuming a
rate of recovery at 30 percent of 156,029 tons,
equals 46,808 possible tons of PEF annually.
Assume a fixed
rate of energy per unit time is being absorbed by and / or generated within an object; and at temperature T the object is in «heat transfer» equilbrium — i.e., the amount of outgoing energy per unit time is
equal to the incoming radiation per unit time.
Yet either way, the «optimal»
rate is still less than the textbook Pigovian
rate, which would normally set the carbon tax
equal to the «social cost of carbon» which we
assumed was $ 20 / ton in our example.
Suppose we
assume that the
rate is either 1 % or 7 % with
equal probability, then 50 years from now our $ 1,000 can be worth either $ 606.53 or $ 30.20 (also with
equal probability).
Not all insurance companies are created
equal though; one of the life insurance companies that we work with is able to offer Preferred and occasionally Preferred Best
rates immediately after giving birth
assuming you qualify otherwise and
assuming the gestational diabetes resolved after birth.
The insurer projects that,
assuming it meets this
rate of return, the cash value would
equal the policy's face value when you pass away.
Assuming all other factors are
equal such as premium, death benefit, financial
ratings for the insurance company, etc..
Much of it depends on the market you're in, but let's
assume the local economy is growing
equal to the population, and wage
rates are
equal inflation.