If you stay in the same tax bracket throughout your life, it makes no difference which account you put your money into
assuming equal returns.
Not exact matches
As for recouping your investment — I am
assuming since this is Mark Cubans Economic Stimulus plan and not Mark Cubans build my portfolio plan — a
return on your investment over three years plus capitalized interest of that
equal to that which would be earned in a money market fund should suffice.
Let's further
assume that the Nikkei companies in the aggregate have a net cash balance
equal to 30 % of market capitalization and decide to
return all the net cash to shareholders as a special dividend, the implied P / E multiple for the Nikkei would drop from 8x to 5x.
In fact, the company's
assumed return on plan assets is so high that it allowed EK to book income from its pension plan
equal to 2.2 % of its revenue last year.
Finally, we
assume that renters will earn a
return on their savings
equal to the average growth of the S&P 500 over the past 20 years.
(Now no one would bother providing capital at 0
return, however essentially it is
assumed that the wage and profit approaches but does not
equal those 2 amounts) Now in addition we
assume that a new method of utilising capital appears that allows the old capital that needed ten labourers to be utilised with 1.
The classic Global Couch Potato portfolio provided healthy average annual
returns of 10.0 % from the start of 1981 through 2015,
assuming the portfolio's four indexes were rebalanced back to
equal dollar amounts each month instead of annually.
The month - to - month closing price is used to calculate the
return, with
equal investments in each stock at the beginning of each month
assumed.
Assuming you buy
equal amounts in Fortis, Royal Bank, and Telus today, that's an average expected
return of 9.6 %.
As Ardrey points out, you
assume that the rate of
return will be
equal to the mortgage rate to break even, but that's not the case.
If we
assume that the risk - free rate is a 3 - month US Treasury (10 - year US Treasury is also common) and
equal to 1.50 %, the portfolio beta is 1.60 (60 % more systematic risk or volatility than the benchmark), the benchmark has
returned 10 % annualized, and the portfolio
return is 20 %, we have:
Most investors just
assume that number is
equal to their actual
return on all the money they have invested.
Assuming your house appreciates at a modest 3 % per year, the more equity you have in your house
equals the less
return on that equity.
Set out below is a matrix showing hurdle
returns in the left column with corresponding target purchase prices under these scenarios
assuming all else remains
equal (hardly a realistic assumption!).
A Comparison of Expected
Return Models The first model is a simple rearview mirror investment approach in which we
assume returns for the next 10 years will
equal the realized
returns of the previous 10 years.
A Betterment account with the same amount of money is $ 260 — a much better deal,
assuming equal rates of
return.
The insurer projects that,
assuming it meets this rate of
return, the cash value would
equal the policy's face value when you pass away.
If the average
return on the collared Index over the next 30 years is
equal to the worst rolling 30 - year period since 1920 (which, as noted in the chart, was 6.9 percent), the cash surrender value IRR at the end of Year 30 will be 5.56 percent rather than the 6.32 percent that is projected on the Policy illustration
assuming a 7.5 percent Index
return.
Finally, we
assume that renters will earn a
return on their savings
equal to the average growth of the S&P 500 over the past 20 years.