The six theologians who led the event — Carter Heyward, Barbara Gerlach, Rita Nakashima Brock, Gail Paterson Corrington, Jacquelyn Grant and Delores Williams — challenged age - old
assumptions about human life, divine power and Jesus Christ as the only true redeemer.
Not exact matches
Paideia proved compatible both with the more social understanding of
human personhood that marked medieval
life and with the more individualistic
assumptions about personhood that marked much Renaissance culture.
In the company of discerning teachers and learners, my education was being shaped out of certain
assumptions that had as much to do with
living life as with thinking
about it: that we are «in relation» whatever we may think of that fact, that the most basic
human unit is not therefore «the self but rather «the relation»; and that this intrinsic mutuality demands — and should be the foundation of — our ethics, politics, pastoral care and theologies.
Can we reconceive theological education in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of
human life, in the public sphere as well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it is adequate to genuine pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds in which the «Christian thing» is
lived, by avoiding naiveté
about historical and cultural conditioning without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can be the unifying overarching goal of theological education without requiring the tacit
assumption that there is a universal structure or essence to education in general, or theological inquiry in particular, which inescapably denies genuine pluralism by claiming to be the universal common denominator to which everything may be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent schooling, without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?
We often fail to make «intellectual space» for God in our reflections
about our social and personal
lives, and we tend to dwarf our
assumptions about the perceptive capacities and destinies of
humans.
This kind of interdisciplinary engagement may also have the side benefit of heightening the theorist's reflective awareness of the underlying sociological
assumptions —
about power,
human nature, the main tendencies of social
life and so on — that s / he inevitably makes in constructing a political vision of how the world ought to be.
It struck Muller that many philosophical questions
about the meaning of
human existence are based on the fundamental
assumption that
life is finite.
Given that we're talking
about an
assumption of
lives lost, you can already see the savings in
human lives right there, especially since the tornado can miss the cars and take out the bus as well.