In these runs, however, the difference between the high - and low - end carbon budgets is largely due to varying
assumptions about mitigation of non-CO2 forcing on climate change.
Not exact matches
In other words, the study does a simple physical analysis of the trade off between conventional
mitigation and negative emissions technologies in a 2C world and makes no
assumptions about changing economic, technological and sociopolitical contexts, the authors note.
The marginal tax rate, average tax rate, and total annual bill are shown, under three different
assumptions about the total costs of the emergency climate
mitigation and adaptation costs (0.5 %, 1.0 %, and 2.0 % of Gross World Product).
200ppm additional CO2 is toughly twice all we have put in since 1945 and consistent with a reasonable
assumption about growth of output and
mitigations likely to be made naturally through changing technology.