Sentences with phrase «asylum claims where»

We have experience of removing Interpol Red Flag notices and work closely with our colleagues in the Immigration Group to deploy political asylum claims where appropriate.
However, in the domestic context its use has been focused on asylum claims where it is applied by decision - makers when assessing medical evidence.

Not exact matches

Genuine Christians who've converted from Islam have had their asylum claims rejected and been sent back to their country of origin where they're at risk of experiencing family rejection, beatings and even death.
«Likewise, we have people in this country who have come here, have claimed asylum, and then they go back on holiday in the places where they claimed asylum from.
He ends the interview claiming that he told John Carpenter his idea for a sequel to Black Christmas where the killer escapes from the asylum and relocates to a small suburban town.
When Clemantine was twelve, she and her sister were granted asylum in the United States, where she embarked on another journey — to excavate her past and, after years of being made to feel less than human, claim her individuality.
You claim Arkham Asylum uses auto - targeting... but unless it's two enemies side by side where the nuance is difficult, I would say there is more control than you attempt in your videos.
In essence, the Court was asked to identify which State was responsible for a child's asylum claim in situations where the child in question has lodged claims in more than one Member State and has no family members present in the territories of Member States.
The Court brings much needed clarity to State practice which previously lacked uniformity in the interpretation of Article 6 and left children in a precarious situation depending on where they claimed asylum.
These areas included immigration (save for asylum claims or work carried out for those in immigration detention); employment (except where there is a discrimination claim); education (except for Special Educational Needs work); welfare benefits (except for appeals to the Upper Tribunal and onwards); debt; clinical negligence for the majority of adults and children; and personal injury.
Section 17 removes legislative definitional ambiguity and makes clear that for asylum support purposes a person remains an asylum seeker, following determination of his claim, during any period when an in - country appeal could be brought to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal and where an appeal is peasylum support purposes a person remains an asylum seeker, following determination of his claim, during any period when an in - country appeal could be brought to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal and where an appeal is peasylum seeker, following determination of his claim, during any period when an in - country appeal could be brought to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal and where an appeal is peAsylum and Immigration Tribunal and where an appeal is pending.
The key points in the court's decision were as follows: (i) It referred to the High Court's decision in R (AW) v Croydon LBC [2005] EWHC 2950 (Admin), [2005] All ER (D) 251 (Dec) which held that where the fresh grounds for asylum were «manifestly nothing of the sort» then a local authority considering whether an applicant's human rights required accommodation to be provided could in limited cases ignore the purported new claim and operate on the assumption that there is no impediment to the individual leaving the UK.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z