If consensus is reached
at judicial dispute resolution process, judge reads consent order into record in presence of parties.
Not exact matches
You may want to consider
judicial review if you were a part of a
dispute resolution proceeding
at the Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) which did not go in your favour and you believe that the decision made by the arbitrator
at the hearing was unreasonable or unfair.
He teaches part - time
at Pepperdine University School of Law, the National
Judicial College, as well as private training sessions for professionals worldwide on the subject of managing high - conflict personalities and high - conflict
disputes.
In Public Access to Documents in the EU, Leonor Rossi and Patricia Vinagre e Silva, respectively professor of EU law
at Lisbon's Nova School of Business and Economics, and lawyer in the field of EU administrative law, set out to analyse, systematise and contextualise the more than 200
judicial disputes emerging out of requests for access to documents of the EU institutions.
Dr Murphy is a
judicial assistant
at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment
Disputes and a member of the World Justice Project's Rule of Law Research Consortium.
I assist clients with issues that arise during bid preparation, and I represent clients in public procurement
disputes against governments
at all levels (bid challenges,
judicial review, civil claims for breach of «contract A / B», etc.).
Tom advises household name clients on high - profile
disputes and investigations as well as preparing senior management for appearance
at Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) hearings, public inquiries and select committee hearings and
judicial reviews.
Because
disputes can be settled
at any stage (and are usually resolved by settlement rather than
judicial decision), the cost of resolving a
dispute is much more uncertain than, for example, the cost of completing a residential real estate transaction.
He also served as a
Judicial Extern for then Chief Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court District of Nevada Mike K. Nakagawa; served as a mediator
at the Saltman Center for
Dispute Resolution; and received the Cali Award in his Lawyering Process III course.
Counsel
at DuMoulin Boskovich are experienced
at handling diverse demands in
dispute resolution and providing representation in all facets of litigation before all levels of the Canadian
judicial system.
We have extensive expertise in navigating all stages of the tax
dispute process, from audit to appeal with tax authorities and
at the
judicial appeal level.
L. Rev. 269 (1944),
at page 286: «The party seeking
judicial notice has the burden of convincing the judge that (a) the matter is so notorious as not to be the subject of
dispute among reasonable men or (b) the matter is capable of immediate accurate demonstration by resort to readily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy.»
This makes investment treaty arbitration into an adjudicatory process for resolving investor - State
disputes that involves predetermined rules of procedure and substance, much like when a State submits to the jurisdiction of an international human rights court or to administrative or constitutional
judicial review
at the domestic level.
Advised on and represented a higher education organisation
at a four day
judicial mediation which successfully resolved a complex employment
dispute.
The Court of Appeal noted that insurance arbitrations are not court proceedings but, rather, are governed by a distinct and defined regime which seeks to efficiently resolve such
disputes between insurers and which did not warrant
judicial intervention, given that courts and arbitrators do not share the jurisdiction
at the first instance.
In 2017 the Ohio State Bar Association recognized the Franklin County Municipal Court (FCMC) for
Judicial Innovation for its Online
Dispute Resolution (ODR) program for helping people settle small claims disputes.Thursday, January 18, 2018
at 2:00 pm... Continue
Administrative law —
Judicial review — Municipal law — Taxation — Real property tax — Payments made by Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the
Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site,
at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M - 13.
The purpose of Small Claims Court is to take
disputes involving relatively small amounts of money out of the more formal
judicial system, in the hope that the claims can be resolved more quickly and
at less expense than in a full - scale court case.
A pretty large volume of the entire U.S. Court of Appeals docket involves sentencing decisions where guilt is not
disputed, and surely panel sentencing in cases with potentially long sentences would reduce that and might even be money saving for the federal
judicial branch as a whole despite the extra effort invested
at the trial court level, in addition to furthering justice by balancing out extreme stances.
The form of special case was settled by the court
at a
judicial management conference, but counsel for the Appellants refused to sign the statement of special case because of the extensive
disputed affidavit evidence that, by then, had clearly demonstrated that the parties were not in agreement with respect to the facts.
This is a multi-track look
at how to apply technology
at all points of the
judicial dispute resolution system.
So, in the circle of life that is the Toronto motions culture, an Issues List developed
at the suggestion of an experienced case management judge to avoid summary judgment motions and to secure an expedited trial of a
dispute on its merits, now finds itself confined to the dustbin of «
judicial nice tries», with the parties turning their backs on the proffered expedited trial date and hunkering down for summary judgment motions.
The outcome of the proceedings, however, would have a special significance in the entire
judicial system, as it would be a primary precedent guiding the superior Courts dealing with electoral
disputes at all levels58.
He has taught
at the University of San Diego School of Law, is on the part - time faculty of the Straus Institute for
Dispute Resolution
at the Pepperdine University School of Law and the National
Judicial College, and lectures
at Monash University in Australia.
He has taught Negotiation and Mediation
at the University of San Diego School of Law, and he is on the adjunct faculty of the Straus Institute of
Dispute Resolution
at the Pepperdine University School of Law and the National
Judicial College.
He is on the faculty of the Straus Institute for
Dispute Resolution
at the Pepperdine University School of Law and the National
Judicial College.
He teaches part - time
at Pepperdine University School of Law, the National
Judicial College, as well as private training sessions for professionals worldwide on the subject of managing high - conflict personalities and high - conflict
disputes.