Sentences with phrase «at slaw»

But TECHSHOW wasn't the week's only high - tech event: Connie Crosby at Slaw live - blogged Rob Hyndman's presentation at Mesh 2.0 on law for web startups, while Rob Hyndman posted videos from the conference.
If you have not read Ruth Bird «s post at the Slaw Blog (Aggravation due to (dis) aggregation), you should do so.
My newest column has been posted at Slaw, Canada's best legal website.
I love the fact that visitors from Iqaluit and Karachi were both at Slaw at pretty much the same time.
Occasionally here at SLAW I feel the need to represent the East Coast with an appropriately themed post.
As one of Canada's most respected and knowledgeable environmental lawyers, Dianne has been a key columnist with us here at Slaw since June of 2010.
This is a post in a series now appearing regularly on Fridays, setting out some articles, videos, podcasts and the like that contributors at Slaw are enjoying and that you might find interesting.
I wonder if anyone at Slaw has taken a look at how the iPad could be used at law firms for document review.
Rather, it was an accidental offering started here at Slaw a few years ago.
And for the law library crew here at Slaw,... [more]
Following up on our Ms. Dewey post, does anyone else feel that Librarian bloggers, and even us here at Slaw, have been duped?
Hoping you will still be able to continue your blogging here at Slaw and elsewhere — I always find your posts informative and helpful!
I'm certainly not the only blogger who received his first break here at Slaw from Simon.
Our goal at slaw is usually to help you find information as efficiently as possible, integrate it into your life and work, and share it with the right people.
When it happens to me I often share them here at Slaw.
We've touched on Google Glass a few times at Slaw; and today I'd like to extend that conversation by highlighting a great article by Matt McGee over on Marketing Land: The Google Glass Privacy Debate: What's Real & What's Overblown Hype.
A new report titled The rise of e-reading, released on April 4th, is just such an example, and will likely be of interest to many of us here at Slaw.
Congratulations to Simon Fodden, the team at Slaw and Laurel Fulford.
At Slaw, we haven't really focused on Bloomberg's entry into the legal market with Bloomberg Law.
I remain unsure about my inclination to a negative answer to the question because there easily could have been something I missed, but what I saw was a campaign conducted in a largely traditional fashion and I have difficulty perceiving the impact social media had on the election, so that is why I'm posting the question here at Slaw.
A topic more than a few of us here at Slaw can identify with.
I've said this before, and possibly here at slaw, but it bears repeating.
We spend a bit of time here at Slaw fielding the news about this and that technical development initiated by others and helping each other cope with change that if not forced on us then certainly is, like the weather, happening without our informed consent.
In fairly recent times the Omnibus has been the subject of a few posts here at Slaw, The Unreasonable and Transgressive Nature of Omnibus Bills (Michael Posluns, June 24, 2011), & Library of Parliament Paper on Omnibus Bills back in November by Michel - Adrien Sheppard.
It's been a busy week here at Slaw central.
From all of us at Slaw, Scott, have a Blithe Yule and a Guid Hogmanay.
Our colleague here at Slaw, Dominic Jaar, after working for years as a house counsel for Bell, has struck out on his own with a practice — Ledjit — aimed at helping businesses, including law firms, manage information flows.
I consulted a lot of friends, including you and a number of people here at Slaw.
Fraser (who's known to many of us here at Slaw) also did a very good job of comparing and contrasting the Canadian and American domestic intelligence laws.
Although we at SLAW should not likely favour one of the major legal publishers over another, with Hein it is hard not to love their databases since, as one colleague put it, «they are so darn nice to deal with».
We've talked at Slaw about the need for a free online Canadian uniform citation guide — indeed, even offered the services of our members to the McGill Guide folks, who declined our help.
This is the last post in a series appearing each Friday, setting out some articles, videos, podcasts and the like that contributors at Slaw are enjoying and that you might find interesting.
A few of us here at Slaw have been giving testimonials to our tablet experiences and I am going to follow the trend today, I am very early in my iPad relationship, you could even call me a Pad - awan, if you will.
Bill C - 27 has received some coverage but should be of special interest at Slaw, as it is a bill which is designed to prosecute those who steal identity, which is a task that technology and that whole interweb thingy, has greatly facilitated.
Now that the thoughtful Jason Wilson, who is, among other things, a columnist here at Slaw, has joined the experiment, I thought it might be interesting to bring it to the attention of our readers to see what they think about it.
Those of you who get your Slaw via email or RSS may not visit the website often enough to know that a little dot has caused a big fuss here at Slaw.
That the topic was Canadian legal research, makes it more appropriate to wish her a happy re-launch from everyone here at Slaw!
The long and strange journey of the AC copyright tariff for universities has been documented here at Slaw and at other locations fairly extensively; if you are interested in this issue you are no doubt aware of the developments.
Congratulations, and I must say, it's wonderful see you blogging on top of your very insightful commenting here at Slaw.
So, thank you to Simon Fodden, who provided not just great encouragement and advice during Law21's start - up phase, but also that first incoming link at Slaw (extremely deserving winner of the top Blawggie for Best Overall Law - Related Blog, by the way) that drove an extraordinary amount of traffic this way.
We web - geeks may be plentiful over at Slaw, but what Canada really needs is a few Mac Lawyers or iPhone JDs.
As we have noted at SLAW before, EVERYTHING has a legal angle.
At Slaw we've referred from time to time to the practice in some US courts of declining any precedential value to cases.
So I'd be very curious if any of our litigators here at Slaw could see a courtroom potential for Google Glass?
We at Slaw have had postings on the CBA Task Force Report on Conflicts of Interest and the Federation of Law Societies response.
Yes, a Christmas stocking just crammed with little goodies, the sort of things to keep you occupied while the rest of us sleep in for just a little bit longer, which is what we'll be doing here at Slaw for the next little while, I imagine.
I invite the Head Start 2010 students to comment about the program here at Slaw.
We've been following the story at Slaw here and here.
During her presentation Darlene identified that about half the law library folk in the audience are reading us here at Slaw and, when asking who the «advance scouts» are for Web 2.0, the audience indicated that Slaw fills this role in the legal research community.
I perceive a slight shift in the nature of what we have been discussing here at Slaw while making no assertions as to what that might mean.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z