Argued and obtained adjournment of impending trial date and an order compelling the plaintiff's attendance
at a defence medical examination.
Medical training [21](39 weeks) is conducted
at the Defence Medical Services Defence College of Health Education and Training at Whittington Barracks in Lichfield.
Not exact matches
I can see us struggling today to breakdown the Sunderland
defence and i'm sorry to say the best we'll get will be a draw.With all the injuries we get every season and the length of time they take to get back, Arsenal FC need to look
at there
medical and conditioning staff.It happens every season to us but not to the other teams.
Lecture series took place
at the
Defence Science and Technology Organisation, the Academy of Science, the John Curtin School of
Medical Research and the National Aquarium.
The book is an important contribution to the cause for the proclamation and
defence of the inviolability of human life, dignity of the person and his fundamental inalienable rights.These pages unfold in the midst of a cultural battle,
at a historic moment when
medical science is characterized, to borrow an expression used by Paul Ricoeur, by the hypertrophy of means and the atrophy of ends.
At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserv
At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The
defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo
medical examination
at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserv
at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant
at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserv
at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such
medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a
medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.
Torts — Negligence —
Medical malpractice — Causation — Trial judge finding respondent obstetrician liable for applicant infant's injuries — Whether, under principles described in Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, it is open for a trier of fact to find causation by drawing an inference based on all the evidence led
at trial, notwithstanding the fact that the
defence has led some evidence to the contrary — Whether, in an informed consent case, the causation issue is decided in accordance with the majority or the minority opinions of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 A.C. 134.
Having been served with the plaintiff's reports,
at the request of the defendants, the plaintiff underwent two
defence medical examinations.
The parties agreed that the applicable legal test on motions for further
defence medical assessment (s) is found in Bonello v. Taylor.2 The applicable factors are set out
at paragraph 16 of that decision as follows:
Prior to working
at MB, Marie started out
at a prominent litigation firm in New Brunswick firm where she gained experience in tort
defence,
medical malpractice and professional liability.
He stated that his signature stamp had been affixed to the report without his authority by an individual
at Riverfront
Medical Evaluations Limited (Riverfront) thecompany who had retained him to conduct the defence m
Medical Evaluations Limited (Riverfront) thecompany who had retained him to conduct the
defence medicalmedical.
[99] Because it had framed its
defence in the manner that it had, it knew that the resolution of the issues
at a trial would involve the hearing of lengthy and costly evidence, including extensive
medical evidence.
One of the editors is a
medical statistician, and another gave evidence
at trial for the
defence.
[18] The court heard from the
defence expert
medical witness, Dr. Michael Ford, a spine and trauma surgeon
at Sunnybrook dealing with serious fracture cases.