So you think it's better that my child learn eating habits from a teacher, but fail
at grammar because she does not teach grammar??
The Department for Education said thousands were missing out on a place
at a grammar because of the current ban on new selective schools.
Not exact matches
Maybe you're scratching your head
at this one
because it's an elemental
grammar mistake but I'm surprised
at how often I hear «I seen» coming out of college - educated people's mouths.
I am making the stronger claim, for which I am indebted to Julian Hartt, that ethics is
at the heart of theology
because the
grammar of Christian discourse is fundamentally practical.
Ethics is
at the heart of theology
because the
grammar of Christian discourse is fundamentally practical.
My
grammar was off
because I am currently sitting
at my desk
at my job
at a major University finishing up some last minute work and I really do not have time to check my
grammar while I am doing other things while I am entertaining you fools in your folly; next!
Mark, a pupil
at Carrick
Grammar School, is a central midfielder who says his favourite player is Cristiano Ronaldo
because «he always has good skills and scores the most goals».
Beyond its central role in standards and tests,
grammar matters
because troubled mechanics can and often do obscure meaning, and students who use the wrong
grammar at the wrong time run a major risk of being judged harshly or not taken seriously in the wider world.
The policy is likely to prompt criticism from
grammar school critics, not least
because it could adversely affect pupil numbers, and therefore funding levels,
at comprehensive or secondary modern schools within 15 miles of selective schools.
It found that although pupils in
grammar schools have higher average attainment
at KS4, this is only
because their schools cherry - picked them in the first place, as demonstrated by the fact that
grammar schools do not drive up overall results in their areas, nor reduce the poverty gap.
I know we're tilting
at windmills,
because when a cogent argument is presented, he doesn't answer; he prefers to save his words for folks he feels he can ridicule and those who attack his execrable
grammar.
Because the author's
grammar is why many of us naysayers bothered to comment to begin with, your claim that we're all mad
at him ignores our actual complaints, which are the faults in the writing.
Secondly, I'm not trying to be rude or to start a conflict, but I recommend working on your online
grammar because it will reflect you in the future and
at my age (14) there is a lot of writing assignments that require the use of a program such as Microsoft Word.
Recalling an anecdote from former
grammar school girl, Lady Justice Hallett, who is a contemporary of his and now a bencher
at Inner Temple, he says: «She told me that
because she was a bright girl, the careers mistress told her that if she did very well, she might become a domestic science teacher.»
U. L. Rev. 291, 298 — 299 (2004)(explaining that the writing center
at the author's law school is a «valuable resource»
because he does not teach «
grammar, style, spelling, etc.»).
General things like your vocabulary,
grammar, sentence construction, etc are very important
because it is the language that will attract the eyes of the reader
at the first glance.
Even if they decide to invite you to a job interview after seeing your poor
grammar, they may be a bit condescending
at the meeting
because you write «your» instead of «you're».