Not exact matches
Of course, there are those who attribute the massive costs and financing considerations exclusively
at the feet of anti-nuke «
alarmists,» but personally, I'm not impressed by the
arguments they make along those lines.
Residents
at risk need merely make the same
arguments as the climate
alarmists re: the precautionary principle and «fairness» — with «geographical» rather than «generational»
arguments (that is: «your neighbor's lives will be ruined» rather than «your children's lives will be ruined»)
As usual the global warming
alarmists / leftists only look
at the tip of the ice berg (pun intended) and neglect the rest of the facts that actually trashes their
argument.