Sentences with phrase «at answering since»

Not exact matches

But Coe was asked the question at a press conference on Wednesday and The Telegraph reported that he «appeared flustered» before he answered, jokingly, «I have only been at Nike since 1978, so that's a fairly new relationship.»

The probable answer lies in the makeup of the IMF, which since its creation at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 has been subject to a US veto.

Redstone correctly answered «At Para — Paramount,» the movie studio he's controlled since Viacom bought it for $ 10 billion in 1994.

If you can answer that, then it might be time to upgrade your talent at that position since you probably are working with a C Player.

In the example at the top of the page, the simple average is 25 % and the standard deviation is 75 % (since the data points of +100 and -50 lie at a distance of 75 away from the simple average); in this case the estimate gives the exact answer of zero for the CAGR:

To answer the first question, we looked at the top 100 venture firms globally, based on longevity (active since 2010), recent activity (investing in 2014 and 2015), rounds led and fund size.

«Now since we still don't know what Cambridge Analytica has done with this data, you heard chairman thune say, as we had discussed, we want to haul Cambridge Analytica in to answer these questions at a separate hearing.»

@Sabio I can't speak for Kris, but since, at least superficially, kris and I seem to have similar views in this area I will answer your question for myself.

To those who would automatically conclude that I was delusional or that I was telling myself to believe I got answer to my prayer, since you weren't there at the time of my experience, I would suggest to try it before you knock it.

Denver: Since it had only been that morning that you had asked to «crash» at our house, I would have expected you to look for an answer to your question.

She answered her call to ministry at the age of 15, and has been preaching, teaching and pastoring in the local church ever since.

I'll also accept the answer of «nothing» that will change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can change your mind it's impossible to debate or even hold a discussion with you and we'll go our separate ways.

I was at a July 4 event over the weekend, and when we recited the pledge, my daughter asked why we do it, and I gave her a real short answer... since we were in the middle of reciting the pledge.

No pressure to answer me here (or at all since we really don't know each other)-- just some food for thought...

From this we can easily perceive that the aesthetic concept of spiritlessness by no means furnishes the scale for judging what is despair and what is not — which moreover is a matter of course; for since it is unable to define what spirit truly is, how could the aesthetical make answer to a question which does not exist for it at all?

Atheist thinks they have all the answers while you believe those theories and hypothesis are solid proof, How should i call that, the real definition would be ignorant or too naive, but you will turn that against me since that's all you're good at.

The basic ontological problem is why there is anything at all and, since what does exist is a plurality, how the things that do exist are unified into a world.88 Neville understands Whitehead's principle of «creativity» (together with «one» and «many,» conjointly called the «Category of the Ultimate» by Whitehead) to be an attempted answer to the ontological question.

Free will doesn't answer the question since if your god was concerned with that, then why the radical chance of its modus operandi from the supposed personal appearances of these gods to none at all?

For the great majority of Christians they were answered satisfactorily at Nicaea and Chalcedon in the adoption of the doctrine of the Trinity with its assertion of Christ's co-eternity and co-substantiality with the Father and with the doctrine of his nature as being the perfect and indissoluble union of two quite distinct but complete and authentic natures; but a significant minority in the church, then and ever since, has found these answers either unintelligible or incredible.

The controlling idea was that since both sides wanted solid information, they could at least agree on what questions should be asked, and then jointly hire the best researchers to find the answers.

Since your reply on December 21, 2016 at 5:38 am does not have a response button, I'll answer it here, since it is releSince your reply on December 21, 2016 at 5:38 am does not have a response button, I'll answer it here, since it is relesince it is relevant.

The answers themselves are sometimes very brief, which is understandable since he can only enter text at about 1 to 2 words a minute.

He continued: «Since Your Electoral Grace wished to know what to do in this matter and thinks that you have done too little, I humbly answer that Your Electoral Grace has already done far too much and should do nothing at all.

In addition, Hartshorne claims that one who denies the existence of God explicitly can not avoid Anselm's conclusion under any circumstances, since his finding meaning in the central religious question at once prevents him from denying the necessity of the affirmative answer.

Since I've already started, I will just guess at the answers, but maybe for the next person or my next time through, it would be good to have a couple of details... — The semolina flour: Use in addition to the regular flour, or replace 1/4 reg with the 1/4 semolina?

Since there is not a clear answer from the Paleo community about the Paleo — ness of arrowroot powder, you could arrive at your own conclusion about whether arrowroot powder is important enough to you to concern yourself with all of this thinking and pondering about whether you should eat it.

Since wines and beers are traditionally served with meals all over the world, the crucial questions to answer are: will the fiery foods overwhelm the wine, and do wines and beers extinguish the fire of the chiles?The fiery main courses have been selected, whether at home or in a restaurant.

Hell, better yet, go support Man Utd who will throw money at everything without having to answer to the money men for signing the biggest dud since Torres in Falcao.

But the one question that has dogged his interviews on and off since the U.S. Open at Winged Foot in 1974, the question that he had to answer over and over again throughout the week at Augusta, even though he was playing one fine round after another, seemed finally to have been laid to rest.

Racing officials have been trying to answer that question and others — like where is the $ 150,000 corpse — since learning that a ringer ran at Belmont

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

No.the solution is not to get some1 to rotate with Giroud, the answer is to get some1 better than Giroud, period.It worries me that Giroud really thinks that Henry is wrong, this shows how much Wenger an the people at Arsenal are caught up in their own bubble unable to see an overview from outside.We've been saying that Girouds not good enough since he came 3 years ago, an im afraid nothing has changed, he still not world class, i can't think of a top team in Europe he would get into.

The second question is difficult to answer, of course, since every player returns playing at a different level.

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If you want to talk mediocrity look at other teams other then Man U even Chelsea and you will understand what mediocrity is Morons like you will never appreciate what Wenger has done for Arsenal football club Certainly more then the current plastic moronic fanbase at Arsenal I've been a season ticket holder since 1976 and this is the worst fanbase I have seen in that time BeforfNs start saying we pay top money my answer is don't come t the ground we don't need stupid fans better to have half empty stadium full of real fans then morons taking out their real frustrations of failure on the team Just ask spuds fans who seem to back their team even though they have only won 2 trophies in 30 years and only been in the cl 4 times as opposed to the cabinet Full of trophies that Wenger has delivered plus a new stadium and works class stars that have played for us in his tenure.

Hapoel went into the game on the back of five straight wins, conceding just one goal in the process, but they had no answer to the all - round skill of Atletico, who have now won 14 consecutive matches in European competition since a 2 - 0 defeat at Udinese in last season's group stage.

With so much talk surrounding what's happening on the pitch, we've been a bit distracted with what might be happening off it... Embed from Getty Images He may be unbeaten since the second game of the season, but Arsene Wenger's future at the Gunners is far from sorted... however, reports in Italy state the club could have the answer.

Surely there's got to be another answer, since you don't see many kids who are still in diapers at the age of 4.

The sitter, 28 - year - old Cecilia Long, answered a Craigslist ad around Thanksgiving and had been watching the boy at her home on a regular basis ever since.

We think they're the best answer to feeding baby since wet nursing became a full - time profession as long ago as 1745 B.C., say editors at «Newsweek» magazine.

This is where I am at now, board meeting is coming up and I have all my questions ready to go... problem is that I will probably not get any of the answers, and processed foods will come back in full force because they feel that is the solution to the financial loss since the food service director has painted the picture that way.

Since then, Lead Stylist for the show, Agata Maszkiewicz WAS able to find time in her busy schedule to finally answer some questions for us gals at The Fashionable Housewife and it was worth the wait!

Pantley's Answer: This is no surprise, since almost half of babies and toddlers end up in their parents» bed at some point during the night.

@agc - I wouldn't say this answer focuses on democracies at all, but since «populism» is a modern term there is some difficulty in associating it with writings from the past.

I'm torn between answering, flagging to migrate to History.SE, and flagging to close as offtopic (as this is about thought process of a private individuals at a newspaper) and flagging to close as offtopic since we can't read the mind of the editor / writer of the article.

My answer: business as usual for the world of the «net, since just about any media presentation we can think of is eventually going to migrate online, at least as an experiment.

But a candidate being hit by outside attack ads and other soft - money campaigns already has a countermeasure at hand, since the natural answer to big political money is to pile up large amounts of small money.

Since this article isn't meant to be some kind of detective story, I think it's fair to point out at this stage that my answer to this question is a resounding «yes».

Cuomo answered two questions from a reporter about COR Development Wednesday while at the New York State Fair, his first comments about the Fayetteville company since Bharara subpoenaed the records.