Sentences with phrase «at bargain levels»

It is harder now to find REITs that trade at bargain levels.

I'm an equities kind of guy, and I've done fairly well with it (15 % + return for the past 10 years — lucked out in the great depression of 08 - 09 because that's when I was able to snatch up stocks at bargain levels because that's when my career formerly started), so it'll be a hard sell, but I'll look into it.

So they systematically invest too much in stocks when they are overpriced and too little in stocks when they are priced at bargain levels.

A market capitalization - weight index will systematically invest too much in stocks when they are overpriced and too little in stocks when they are priced at bargain levels.

This homebuilder is growing at double - digit rates, but the stock price is at bargain levels.

These shares have been punished in 2011 and now trade at bargain levels.

Overall, this year's All Star team sports strong price momentum, generous earnings and sales growth, while trading at bargain levels based on earnings and other metrics.

The portfolio trades at bargain levels thanks to the value tests we employ.

Anyway... this is new territory for CanLII, and I wish them luck in this exciting venture, hoping they find like minded individuals who agree that it is «wrong to conflate «free» with an assumption of lower quality,» and whom will be willing to provide their intelligence and analysis at bargain level pricing.

Not exact matches

Maybe the stock is the stock that keeps on giving, and this should be considered a one - time bargain to buy the stock at cheaper levels than it deserves.

Even those consumers trundling home in their bargain - stuffed minivans must know, on some level, that all those saved pennies might come at a cost, though Walmart's results suggest such worries aren't keeping them up at night.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

As more than half of S&P stocks sit in correction territory, some market participants are recommending bargain buys at these levels.

S&P 500 financials stand at a 15.5 x trailing ratio; thus, brokerage shares are not a bargain at current price levels.

And so, you have a $ 70 million mill, you have a polymetallic deposit, great community support, and it has excellent exploration potential in upside, so that's a company I think is a bargain at these levels, and one that I continue to buy at these prices.

Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to the impact of: adverse general economic and related factors, such as fluctuating or increasing levels of unemployment, underemployment and the volatility of fuel prices, declines in the securities and real estate markets, and perceptions of these conditions that decrease the level of disposable income of consumers or consumer confidence; adverse events impacting the security of travel, such as terrorist acts, armed conflict and threats thereof, acts of piracy, and other international events; the risks and increased costs associated with operating internationally; our expansion into and investments in new markets; breaches in data security or other disturbances to our information technology and other networks; the spread of epidemics and viral outbreaks; adverse incidents involving cruise ships; changes in fuel prices and / or other cruise operating costs; any impairment of our tradenames or goodwill; our hedging strategies; our inability to obtain adequate insurance coverage; our substantial indebtedness, including the ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and to generate the necessary amount of cash to service our existing debt; restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness that limit our flexibility in operating our business; the significant portion of our assets pledged as collateral under our existing debt agreements and the ability of our creditors to accelerate the repayment of our indebtedness; volatility and disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, which may adversely affect our ability to borrow and could increase our counterparty credit risks, including those under our credit facilities, derivatives, contingent obligations, insurance contracts and new ship progress payment guarantees; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; overcapacity in key markets or globally; our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel or the loss of key personnel; future changes relating to how external distribution channels sell and market our cruises; our reliance on third parties to provide hotel management services to certain ships and certain other services; delays in our shipbuilding program and ship repairs, maintenance and refurbishments; future increases in the price of, or major changes or reduction in, commercial airline services; seasonal variations in passenger fare rates and occupancy levels at different times of the year; our ability to keep pace with developments in technology; amendments to our collective bargaining agreements for crew members and other employee relation issues; the continued availability of attractive port destinations; pending or threatened litigation, investigations and enforcement actions; changes involving the tax and environmental regulatory regimes in which we operate; and other factors set forth under «Risk Factors» in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and subsequent filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In obedience to this, Christians must oppose segregation at every level and in every form; they must support the rights of labor to organize for collective bargaining.

At the AFR Retail Summit in Melbourne, ACCC Chairman Rod Sims discusses three related themes around competition and retail; first, removing restrictions, and using the competition laws to good effect; second, addressing misuse of bargaining power in the supply chain; and third, how consumer protection plays an important role in creating a level playing field and underpinning competition and our market economy.

As such, # 13.1 million seems like a bargain for a footballer so promising, yet clearly already able to compete and contribute at the highest level.

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

Chelsea and Manchester United have both been strongly linked with the Welshman, who would have to reach super-human levels to ever justify his world - record # 85m price tag, with the club's previous record signing Cristiano Ronaldo giving him an almost impossible job in that respect, having somehow managed to look a bargain at # 80m with his amazing record of 310 goals in 299 appearances.

Nevertheless, Goretzka has certainly made a big impression thus far, and at such a young age, he'll still be expected to improve and develop his all - round game significantly which could make this swoop a potential bargain if he goes on to take his ability to higher levels and he'll need regular playing time to do that which should arguably be his priority.

The # 8m price quoted by Thomas seems a bit steep for a talent who is only proven at Championship level, but we know Daniel Levy drives a hard bargain!

p & p, whereas little Mikel, Jack and Ox come in at bargain basement level # 4 exc.

Nearly three - in - four government employees at the state and local level work under a collectively bargained contract — almost double the national average of 39 percent.

New forms of collective voice and bargaining through unions, as workplace representatives, are therefore needed at the firm level.

And at the local level, of course, all such decisions are subject to collective bargaining; and local unions have regularly made sure that the data don't actually get used in ways that might reflect on the performance of individual teachers, and thus be a threat to jobs.

Last week, the Department of Education announced plans for a «national education reform conference on labor - management collaboration» to be held early next year, where they plan to «highlight examples of progressive collective bargaining agreements across the country and promote opportunities for management and labor to forge reforms at the state and district level.»

Any number of factors, from excessively generous concessions at the bargaining table to a fiscal crisis at the state level, can throw a district into financial turmoil.

Roosevelt's dictum has long been undermined by collective bargaining between employees and public officials at all levels of government.

Koppich argues, however, that teacher interests can be protected via reform - oriented collective bargaining agreements that put student performance first by promoting flexibility and collaborative problem solving at the school level.

He suggests that the subjects for bargaining may include many «non-salary» items, such as teaching loads, class size, curricular and program choices, questions of student discipline, and selection of administrative personnel — matters traditionally decided heretofore at the local level.

Professor Simon, in his thoughtful analysis of the political ramifications of this case, states that one of the most likely consequences of the District Court's decision would be an increase in the centralization of school finance and an increase in the extent of collective bargaining by teacher unions at the state level.

NEA at the local level raise funds for scholarships, conduct professional development workshops, bargains contracts for school employees.

This is an innovative and exciting example of using union contract negotiations to win progressive change at the local level — what is becoming known as «bargaining for the common good.»

Thanks to state laws that force districts to bargain with National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers affiliates, and the considerable political heft that the two unions bring to bear in the form of lobbying and $ TK million in campaign donations to state legislators, reform - minded districts are often outmanned and outgunned at the state level.

However, districts could lose all that additional funding if any particular school site exceeds the required class size, unless school officials have negotiated a collective bargaining agreement with their teachers» union that sets class sizes at a different level, according to the analysis.

The legislation, called Assembly Bill 5, on the other hand, would require each aspect of a teacher evaluation system be collectively bargained at the local level.

For one, unlike most other states, West Virginia doesn't allow for collective bargaining at the local level; the same is true of Oklahoma.

Over the last quarter century, the teachers unions have clearly been the most powerful force in American education, and they have clearly been using their extraordinary power — in collective bargaining at the local level, in the political process at the state and national levels — to undermine major reform and to burden the schools (via seniority provisions, the protection of bad teachers, and all the rest) with ineffective forms of organization.

The criteria for the other 20 percent must be collectively bargained at a local level.

«From the beginning we said to the CTU, «you take care of what you need to do to get your collective bargaining rights protected and we had a lot of people objecting at the state level about this charter levy piece so we'll handle that piece at the state level,»» she said.

When pressed, the company stated that the base model will start near $ 29,950, making it an absolute bargain for those wanting Mercedes - level comfort at Infiniti prices.

Bargain hunters will prefer the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, which comes in at $ 30,550 in top trim level, or the Ford Fusion Hybrid, which starts south of $ 27,000.

According to Gary Walkowicz, a member of the bargaining committee at Ford's Dearborn Assembly plant, freezing entry - level wages would erode the quality of life for workers, and flattening the skilled - trade classifications would make it easier for Ford to make future job cuts.

The bargain of the day, at a sale price of just $ 6,270, was a 1956 Bentley S1 right - hand - drive sedan which was described as largely original and appeared to be in decent, driver - level condition.

The LR2 HSE, the upper - level model, starts at $ 35,375 — a bargain, really, for what you get — and the EPA rating is a not - terrible 15 mpg in the city, 22 mpg on the highway.

It's a bargain at the base level; in GT trim it's an exciting performer; and it transforms into an airy, comfortable grand tourer with a convertible top.

Prices are also still the wrong side of sensible, with the entry - level ForTwo costing # 11,125 (although the ForFour is a relative bargain at a starting point just # 495 more).

At upwards of $ 35,000, the SV is still a bargain, too, if you compare it with some European imports or entry - level Japanese luxury cars, including some of the Maxima's Infiniti brethren.