Sentences with phrase «at countering evidence»
Those who do not think Jesus existed are frequently militant in their views and remarkably adept at countering evidence that to the rest of the civilized world seems compelling and even unanswerable.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
I can provide documented month by month evidence to counter your Quran burning by one pastor and your mean spirited demonstrations at funerals by Fred Phelps and co...
I've debated christians and if there's one thing they are really good at, it's twisting around like an oiled eel to counter any bit of scientific evidence that runs contrary to their beliefs.
The government said it wanted to use evidence of the affairs at Mr. Silver's sentencing, most likely to counter testimonials from the defense that he was a man of good character, strong ethics and integrity.
Paul Ferrara counters that his scientists at the Virginia Department of Forensic Science need to know what evidence to focus on in order to do their jobs efficiently when faced with a mountain of evidence.
The FDA advised Solae on at least one occasion that it had not convincingly established the claim that soy can prevent cancer and that it had failed to counter massive evidence that soy can cause, contribute to or accelerate cancer growth.»
In a similar vein, W. James Popham, professor emeritus at UCLA and test design expert, has concluded that the use of students» test scores to evaluate teachers «runs counter to the most important commandment of educational testing — the need for sufficient validity evidence.»
Of course, we have much research evidence to counter these claims, but for now we will just leave all of this at that.
This category name is often mistakenly seen as synonymous with «lots of graphic sex scenes,» but these two books provide solid counter evidence to this claim, as neither book contains any consensual sex at all between so - called «new adults.»)
Energy efficiency helped California grow an extra $ 31 billion finds study: Countering Bush administration claims to the contrary, environmental officials for the state of California and the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo have found significant evidence that greenhouse gas pollution can be substantially reduced at a profit rather than a cost.
davidnewell at 13:13 PM on 29 May, 2014 As more and more evidence accumulates in regard to the looming catastrophe, more serious consideration may be given to ways to counter at least the rate of increase, so that more time is available to employ other methods, and educate «the masses».
For example, this old contrarian / denier canard was trotted out at the hearing: «Melting ice caps on Mars serve to counter evidence of anthropogenic warming on Earth.»
Like I pointed out at KK's blog, that is why he is asking the person to provide the body of evidence that counters the consensus that has formed over the few conservative tenets in the IPCC.
SUMMARY: Countering Bush administration claims to the contrary, environmental officials for the state of California and the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo have found significant evidence that greenhouse gas pollution can be substantially reduced at a profit rather than a cost.
So the truth of the contents were really at the basis of that evidence and we did see an analysis near its turns as admission as exception to hearsay, maybe it was an admission counter to her own interests.
[17]... the theory that the accused would have sent the e-mail as a result of the inducement offered by the police officer some five weeks earlier when, as the trial judge found, the officer appeared to imply that the accused would not be charged if he apologized for the sexual improprieties... Indeed the theory that there is some connection between the inadmissible confession and the e ‑ mail runs counter to S.G.T.'s own evidence and defence at trial that the contents of the e-mail had nothing to do with the allegations of sexual assault.
Hotel room wifi may require a leap of faith and an ad hoc legal analysis (promissory estoppel, ostensible authority, parol evidence rule, burden of proof...) when you are told at the check - in counter «Just accept the agreement to pay [insert outrageous daily rate here] for wifi in your room — we won't actually charge you for it.»