Two of the treaties finalized in Rio 20 years ago — one aimed at conserving biological diversity, the other
at curbing emissions of greenhouse gases — are widely viewed as failures.
David M. Herszenhorn has a piece today examining this week's Senate action (or inaction, more accurately) as the debate over the Warner - Lieberman - Boxer bill aimed
at curbing emissions of greenhouse gases stalled amid partisan parrying using age - old rules of order.
Not exact matches
At the same time, though, he dealt a big blow to the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or RGGI, calling it a «failure» because it had done little on its own to
curb emissions of heat - trapping
gases.
Boxer and the Senate's other senior Democrats — who control the body — have largely deemphasized the issue since 2010, when they abandoned a major effort to pass legislation aimed
at curbing U.S.
emissions of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases.
Yesterday afternoon's announcement concerned three different sets
of proposed power plant rules: language aimed
at curbing greenhouse gas emissions in new, existing and modified power plants.
In a three - day summit
at the United Nations on global warming this week, a parade
of representatives from developing countries expressed growing discontent with the lack
of action by rich ones to start
curbing emissions of greenhouse gases that, in the long run, are likely to exact the most harm in the world's poorest places.
The article cites a draft two - page text circulated
at the meeting, which appears to indicate movement toward long - term (2050) and near - term (2020) steps to
curb emissions of greenhouse gases — although with all
of the soft language required to get both developing and rich countries on board.
At the same time, some
of the largest developing countries sent strong signals that they were willing to accept outside auditing, in essence,
of their efforts to
curb the growth in
greenhouse gas emissions.
Geoengineering has been attacked by some environmentalists as creating a possible end run around the need for
curbing emissions of greenhouse gases at the source, and also for coming with its own basket
of potential environmental consequences.
However scientists look
at these events, the success
of climate - change skeptic McIntyre hints
at why the findings
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report and other mainstream, peer - reviewed global climate studies have failed to persuade Congress and the Bush Administration that action is needed to
curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Though governments around the world have agreed to
curb emissions, and
at numerous international meetings have reaffirmed their commitment to holding warming to below 2C by the end
of the century,
greenhouse gas concentrations are still rising
at record rates.
Wrangling in discussions ending today in Germany suggests the controversy will be dragged out until a Paris conference
at the end
of next year, potentially undermining a final deal to replace the Kyoto Protocol on
curbing greenhouse -
gas emissions.
Under the Paris Agreement reached in 2015, countries will take stock
at five - year intervals
of their progress in limiting
greenhouse gas emissions to
curb the rise in global average near - surface temperatures.
One
of the organizations funded by Donors Trust is the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a think tank that is openly skeptical
of the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change and which opposes legislation aimed
at curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
By the mid-2000s, General Electric, Walmart and other companies were pledging to
curb the
emission of greenhouse gases, according to Spencer Weart, author
of «The Discovery
of Global Warming» and former director
of the Center for History
of Physics
at the American Institute
of Physics.
This post was written by Patsy Doerr, global head
of Corporate Responsibility & Inclusion
at Thomson Reuters During the recent United Nations Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru, there was a renewed urgency by nations to
curb greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions worldwide to reduce the impact
of climate change.