Stable value funds may have $ 90 of assets
at current market value backing $ 100 of book value.
Not exact matches
Most fans would LOVE to have him
back at fair
market value for a RB, which would be based off the
CURRENT RB contracts rather than being overinflated for two years by ONE horrible contract (Adrian Peterson).
So, that's my preferred measure for how much has the underlying
value of the firm increased: growth in fully diluted tangible book
value (ex-AOCI), adding
back dividends, and subtract out net equity issuance / buyback measured not
at cost, but
at the
current market price.
Wexboy, Reference your 30th Sept
current summary in KR1, From my point of view I am in awe of your 2 % holding in KR1, The figures are very compelling and staggering in forward potential, I might have this projection all wrong but here goes, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a
current book to
value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the
back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us
markets award much higher book
value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking
at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, s?
Growth in fully diluted tangible book
value (ex-AOCI) is a good measure of firm performance, if you add
back dividends, and subtract out net equity issuance / buyback measured not
at cost, but
at the
current market price.
Assuming Apple buys
back shares
at the
current market value, it would cut shares outstanding by 15.7 % by the end of 2015.
However if
at years end stocks are now considered 10 % over
valued by those same metrics and your stock allocation is now
at 55 % because of the returns then rather than adjusting
back down to 50 % perhaps now you adjust your reasonable allocation percentage down to 45 % to reflect to over-valuation that is inherent in the
current valuation of the stock
market.
The change will allow previous homeowners who have been through foreclosure to purchase their home
back at current market value, if available.