Sentences with phrase «at doing that in my opinion»

Hector Bellerin or whoever plays right - back or right wingback for Arsenal should find space to provide crosses into the box, though the Spaniard is one of the poorer players at doing that in my opinion.

Not exact matches

While it's still unclear if Session's views will translate into changes in policy or enforcement, this attitude shift at the federal level doesn't align with public opinion on the issue.

In much the same way that journalists like Chris Wallace have said they don't believe debate moderators should call out lies, because that would be equivalent to expressing an opinion, the Times and other newspapers have always believed that journalists should be rigorously balanced at all times.

This has to be done at the beginning of most startups and it is, in my opinion, the most underrated skill a founder must have.

On the Labor side, at least one in five voters have a «don't know» opinion of Bill Shorten.

Even a small number of high - profile accidents could do more than statistics to influence the opinions of lawmakers and potential customers, at least in the short term.

In a majority opinion written by Judge Christopher F. Droney, the appeals court said the Barry Diller - backed Internet company does not appear to violate copyright law because subscribers are assigned to their own tiny antennas at Aereo's Brooklyn data centre.

Although it's still too early to tell whether he keeps his streak alive at JC Penney (jcp), what he did at Target (tgt) to turn a retailer that otherwise competed with the likes of Sears (SHLD) and Kmart into a hip, desirable brand is nothing short of miraculous, in my opinion.

«The preferred solution, in the opinion of many of these countries, is for the United States to internalize the effects of its monetary policies — more specifically, not to exit or at least to do so at a time that is more convenient for others,» Deputy Bank of Canada Governor John Murray recently said in prepared remarks for a speech about the likely effects of the end of QE.

Opinion polls showed that voters had opposed privatization at the outset (as did the press and many Conservative back benchers), but the Conservatives pointed out that Tony Blair rode to victory in part by abandoning «Clause Four» of the Labour Party's 1904 constitution, advocating state control over the means of production, distribution and exchange.

In our opinion, this is a bad idea, even if your chosen company is doing an excellent job at the end of the day that money is still your retirement pot, and nobody else will care as much about it as you do.

• Participation in an anonymous survey of «camper» opinions regarding «current events» such as best (fake) news media, who they would vote for if they had it to do over, health care, tax code restructuring, immigration, etc. • An exciting and provocative five person panel discussion planned and prepared by veteran campers prior to arriving at CK.

This is not surprising because even the NDP, in my opinion is a little about «we at the top know it all» then the real consultation of those who do the work and those who are real farmers and not all the experts sitting at their offices somewhere even outside of Alberta.

They can't sell without creating a loss and they dare not do that because it gets them in trouble with the Republicans and the House who don't understand monetary policy at all, but have a lot of opinions on it.

In my opinion, if you're going to venture into this sort of trading environment, you must do so at your own risk.

Thank you for pointing out that our individual opinions regarding what may or may not have happened at some point in human history about two thousand years ago, that our individual opinions regarding the credibility (or lack thereof) of gospel accounts in terms of their accuracy and historicity, do not trump what actually happened (or didn't happen) in human history about two thousand years ago.

If a person senses they are being a pain at work by expressing opinions that their employer does not like, and / or the manner in which those beliefs are delivered, then it is good sense to lower the tone or move on to another job.

I don't know how many people here are from Aurora — Co, but some comments are not helping in any way the survivors and families.I respect all religions in the world and I also respect the opinion of those who don't believe in God or anything.But, instead of blasphemy the name of God, send your positive thoughts and energy to those who survived this tragedy.Even though some of you show no signs of good Christians you should show at least signs of good neighbors.You still can be an Atheist and have compassion for others!Don't let the evil be inside you, Aurora — CO needs to heal in peace!!!

You don't have to agree that women are equal to men, at any level, but you are being pretty offensive in how you express your opinion — especially when you consider the number of women in this discussion.

In the words of Mgr Patrick Burke: «It is the opinion of many of us that he did indeed have something of importance to say and to offer to the Church and that his work does at least deserve to be taken seriously.»

I offered, at that time, my opinion that if you take Tony's post about Driscoll in the context of all Tony has said about Pastor Mark, it's very clear that Tony does not «reflect the refusal of the church to understand spiritual abuse» as David observed.

I find it funny that as an atheist you would have any opinion on it at all, since you don't believe in any of it anyhow.

And, at the core, I consider myself to have a female gender much more than a male gender identity... and Germain probably would think otherwise... but she holds nothing that I desire... therefore, in reality, her opinion does not matter to me.

True, in a particular case I do claim the right to be more objective, farseeing and wiser than a certain other person whose opinion I encounter, but I do this only because I attribute reason and honesty to all men, at least in principle, and hence also to myself, not because I prefer my own subjective opinions.

In short, cataphatic theology allows us to proclaim what God DOES say about X, so much so that for the human to proclaim Y would set one at odds with God's opinion.

Which is why I don't mind them not being present at all... but only allowing «like» s is much more superficial in my opinion.

In my opinion, the posting you made right above me here has really nothing to do with the topic at hand.

They don't make me feel boxed in and I am free to have my own opinions and ask my own questions... however, I still greive the tight knit «family» that was at the other place.

As to your assertion on epistemology, you don't go outright and say it but you are basing your opinion on the sole idea that at this point in time, our epistemology is flawed and ipso facto our theories are flawed.

Social media gives us all the ability to express our ideas — and our opinions — about whatever we want, and gives us the sense of security of doing so right from our phones while waiting in line at the deli counter.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

Sloppy theological arguments based on transient cultural norms and individual opinions do not hold up when we take an honest look at whether Christians should participate in or watch boxing and MMA.

In my opinion, at least, as long as one is on the job, all peculiarly religious activities should take second place to doing «the job» in sweat, intelligence and the power of GoIn my opinion, at least, as long as one is on the job, all peculiarly religious activities should take second place to doing «the job» in sweat, intelligence and the power of Goin sweat, intelligence and the power of God.

It is the opinion of many of us who are involved in Faith that he did indeed have something of importance to say and to offer to the Church and that his work does at least deserve to be taken seriously.

General principles can not, in my opinion, be laid down at this stage of the (still young) Jewish - Christian dialogue; but when polemic is undertaken in such dialogues, it must always be done in careful and clear awareness of the unpleasant uses to which such polemics have often been put by Christians in the past.

Contrary to common opinion (at least in the evangelical / charismatic circles I was immersed in) I don't see that as a fatal weakness but a strength, removing the message from the brittle confines of times and places and cultures long gone and into the realm of resilient timelessness.

In my opinion he does not do it well at all.

I know that the preacher's wife in my church growing up was very constrained; she didn't feel free to express any negative opinions at all, even just to talk about her kids being a handful, because the pastor's family is supposed to be the «example».

However, I do agree with you that we should live our life to the fullest and love each other, so let's not try in ROFL (that is pretty juvenile) at each other's opinion.

For the same reasons you believe morals are merely opinions, many / most Christians do not have faith in the Spirit, and basically ignore or outright reject the teaching on moral freedom found in Paul's letter to the Galatians (among other places in the NT, but it is most - clearly written out there), though they don't know they are rejecting it and somehow think they are in agreement with it (if they've read the letter at all).

But at least the following conclusions do, in my opinion, stand out.

At any rate, in a paper I wrote a couple of years later in graduate school, I argued both the pro and anti-abortion positions, and when another student» an antiabortion activist, I think» angrily demanded to know my opinion, I said, honestly, that I didn't know.

I don't like being yelled at, and in my opinion it's no way to preach, however ubiquitous it is in some circles.

The statistics are merely sets of data measured in a specific context and at least the person who posted them had the respect to allow us to make our own interpretation rather than inserting his own opinion which is what Buddha actually wanted people to do... not just accept things on blind faith but interpret for themselves and experience for themselves.

Andrew and BaJeezus, in my opinion, are doing very well at amassing facts, and verifying and interpreting them.

secondly he was not the only one in the church who was a «non believer» many others do not «believe» as well as myself and yet non of us saw a problem with something that was being done out of respect and unison for the majority not for just one person opinion, and last, no one ever said he «had» to pray the only command was to bow your head and stare at the ground counting how many toes you had for all we carried, do what you want if choose not to pray but just bow your head in uniformity not cry about it blow it up and change the way events happen — if you have and complaints or questions please FEEL FREE to contact me [email protected]

Steve, Rather than concerning yourself with Not hearing the Word of God at the dry cleaners... or at the park... or at the grocery store... or at a rock concert... or at the movies... or lying in my bed..., Frankly it is my expressed opinion that if you are Not that is entirely your own fault, especially in bed, don't you Read the Word?

So, if I dress up for church, clearly I'm dressing up to impress other humans or to show them how much I» «respect» God by wearing my best clothes instead of the grungy nightshirt God saw me in an hour before or because someone at some time said that's what I ought to do because that was their opinion of what God likes or doesn't like.

At the end of the thread, I will jump in with my opinion (and I do have one).

Second, if «The sciences can do nothing in getting at the heart of this,» then this conversation is pointless as we are only left with opinions that can not be supported.