Sentences with phrase «at face value if»

It is, of course, true that benchmark scores do not always tell the full story, but in this case, we have to take them at face value if only because of the sheer jump amazement that they induce.

You could also buy a whole life policy that pays the policy at face value if you die before your children finish college.

If you're really trying to earn as many points as possible for your Uber rides, you might consider purchasing Uber gift cards at face value if you have a way to earn more than the 3X or 2X points per dollar spent.

Deniers, as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet show, seem to have an endless supply of polemical tricks and dodges: they simply discount Jewish testimony out of hand as lie or fantasy; inculpatory testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are taken at face value if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted as hyperbolic or figurative if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films of executions are dismissed as fakes.

In many situations, the factor will insist on «recourse» — the right to sell the invoice back to you at face value if the debt goes unpaid beyond, say, 90 days.

Not exact matches

At the end of the day, it's not about if sales development reports to sales, marketing, or the CEO, it's about what's working to communicate your brand's value and how your company provides a solution to a problem that your customers are facing.

«But if that person interviewed at face value, they never would have been hired.»

In a sense this is about inequality, and the diverging fortunes of different bank employees: At the high end, banking remains a human enterprise of valued professionals interacting face - to - face with clients, including, if the clients want, by using terrible terrible voicemail.

New speculators may be buying Ukrainian debt at half its face value, hoping to collect in full if Russia is paid in full — or at least settle for a few points» quick run - up.

If you buy a bond for less than face value on the secondary market (known as a market discount) and you either hold it until maturity or sell it at a profit, that gain will be subject to federal and state taxes.

«On the face value it looks like they got a very high rent, but if you count in concessions it looks different,» said Faith Hope Consolo, chair of the retail division at Douglas Elliman.

Indeed, it wasn't that the polls were wrong about the UK election; results were close, if you took people's voting intentions at face value.

If the bond included a «call provision,» the issuer can redeem it early, too — in order to issue new bonds at a lower interest rate, for example — but usually pays you a little more than the face value to do so.

If an agency mortgage backed security was bought at a price which was a premium to its face value, the investor will lose the difference between the premium and face value when its prepaid.

You speak as if you have done so yourself... or have you accepted at face value what Dawkins and many others claim: that there is no evidence of God?

And if your description is to be taken at face value, what it has engendered is compromise in order to gain comfort in numbers.

For Hume advanced a philosophy that, if taken at face value, would not only undermine the claims to truth of religion but those of morality and of science also.

There are many methods of communication found throughout the New Testament that screw us up if we take the text at face value.

In short — if you take everything in the Bible at face value — you'll end up shovelling snow in July...

I don't think I could take his opinions at face value, if he really thinks most people are fools.

If you undermine their authority (to take at face value and not resort to «they were deluded and scapegoating»), aren't you undermining perhaps the most significant apologetic we have to know that the resurrection really happened?

Christian fundamentalists, who read the New Testament at face value, and who look at today's events through the lens of the New Testament, are inclined to treat the passing of the last 2,000 years as if nothing has substantially changed.

I'd say he got it right even if his wit is lost on some who would take his comments at face value.

If it is not devine there is no way you should take it at face value.

Why should any rational adult accept at face value a claim that if made about anything other than religion, would be scoffed at as a lie?

What I mean is that, if you take 1 Timothy 2:12 in it's most plain sense, at face value, then women are not allowed to teach period; somehow you have inferred that men can learn from women when done «PRIVATELY» but not «IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LOCAL CHURCH.»

If the Bible taken at face value can not be trusted, then Christianity is only for the elites who can nuance it just so.

If we take the bible at face value the god which got her pregnant was at least a few thousand years old.

I'll mention one fundamental one: if in these contexts I take the liberty to outrightly deny that indeed it was God who said, and not some power group with a dirty political agenda, then WHEN and WHY will I accept «God said...», this and that (and particularly more positive, palatable stuff») at face value?

Maybe if you actually read your bible at face value you too would comprehend how truly vicious the god you believe in is.

If you don't take the Bible at face value, then look to men like Polycarp, Clement, and Ignatius who were taught by the Apostles, and read as much as you can about these men as well as what they themselves wrote.

There are tons of words within James 1 and 2 which evidence that James is speaking to folks as if to take their faith at face value and is simply urging them to get to work.

The contestants were told that hostages will drown if they fail, and he takes that threat at face value; we are left to wonder how the good Dumbledore came to consent to such an emotionally abusive contest.

People are explaining to you that your are misinterpreting scripture and explaining that if you do not study scripture and just take things at their superficial face value you are probably going to draw an erroneous conclusion.

If you tell your wife you love her, she may take you at face value, or perhaps she may ask you to buy her a ring and some roses now and again as «proof».

If God doesn't go «zap» then we can not simply accept all the miracle stories as true at face value.

«I love this one: http://theresurgence.com/2012/… The author, if you take him at face value, admits that 1 % of the Bible has errors.

I love this one: http://theresurgence.com/2012/05/28/what-to-say-when-someone-says-the-bible-has-errors The author, if you take him at face value, admits that 1 % of the Bible has errors.

The problem i have is when people say Christianity is shoved in their face on a consistent basis; I don't know where people with this complaint hang out at but if you watch TV what ever program there is always has secularism, rarely are Christian values pushed in modern programing.

Only if you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.

Unless Gazidis and Wenger have this kind of a pattern in mind... we are in for some super thrashing this season if he and Wenger's words are to be taken at face value...

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

If anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clIf anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clif we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clif Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» club

Chile were my value pick prior to the tournament at +800 odds and I planned on hedging if they faced Argentina in the finals.

A # 34 million loss for the last recorded accounting period (2012 - 3), including staff costs of # 26.1 million is far from small beer and if the television deal Leicester will enjoy from August makes those amounts look piddling at face value, the wages and transfer fees required to compete at the top level will almost certainly be sufficient to keep the club in the red for some time to come.

If you are siding towards them to come good in the face of adversity, then grab the big value odds of 3/1 on them to do it at Paddy Power, who are also running a Money Back Special for the round of sixteen at Brazil 2014.

OK, if we just take his comments at face value we can come up with at least one big reason why he might want to return to Boca Juniors: He wants to ensure he's on the World Cup squad.

I do not think it is a case of being «unwilling» to wait, I think if we take it at face value, they're trying to be pro-active.

If the tickets going to all and sundry came back to the market at face value and ended up in the hands of the fans there would be less to moan about — but we know they will end up on eBay and worse.

I am taking the word at face value... if there is some specialized definition that is more applicable, maybe somebody here who is qualified to comment can do so.