The cases only resolve what is
at issue between the parties and do not always explain the legal principles as clearly as we would like.
Not exact matches
So, in the current labour dispute
between Canada Post and CUPW, it is Canada Post that has
issued a lockout notice, that will likely come into effect on Monday
at 12:01 a.m.. Both Canada Post and Labour Minister MaryAnn Mihychuck are hoping that CUPW agrees to binding arbitration (in which an outside arbitrator would review the dispute and arrive
at decision that both
parties would be bound to accept) before the proposed lockout deadline.
«Although there may still be areas of disagreement
between the
parties on
issues of implementation, the importance of those areas of potential concern is uncertain, as is the necessity of this Court's involvement
at this point to resolve them.»
This morning I looked
at an old
issue of Today's Parent magazine that was on my coffee table (I kept it because it gave great ideas about how to organize children's birthday
parties), and read about competition
between mothers.
My fear stems from the fact that a renowned economists and a vice Presidential candidate of a
party whose philosophy stands on ideals of conservatism, will confidently move around with a message of establishing one factory in each district
at this point of our national reconstruction.How do you implement such a policy after scrapping 70 % of taxes across, build 350 secondary schools, free secondary school etc.You sum up all these deceitful platitudes and you begin to shiver.We are made to believe that the
issue of unemployment would be buried under their government forgetting that, we were made to lineup in hot sun to register for employment only to be told in 2005 by Ghana Statistical service that unemployment figure for that year was the highest do far and remains the highest today.The lowest unemployment figures recorded
between 2001 - 2016 was recorded in 2013 under Mahama.So who possess the practical record to support his call.
Speaking
at a press conference in Whitehall, Nick Clegg referred to Tory plans to make a further # 25bn of cuts to the welfare budget as a «monumental mistake» and went on to outline ideological differences
between the two coalition
parties on
issues like fairer taxation.
The three candidates vying for two seats on the East Hampton Town Board debated a number of
issues Monday evening
at the East Hampton Library, with a political newcomer who has the
party's backing repeatedly if gently attempting to draw a distinction
between himself and the candidate who does not.
In a statement
issued afterwards, Mr Griffiths said Mr Blair had assured MPs on Wednesday that «nothing should break the historic link
between the Labour
party and the trade unions» and said the
party's position remained «
at all levels» in opposition to a cap.
Although the two candidates agreed on most
issues, pitting themselves against the Republican incumbent, the biggest difference in philosophy
between the two centered on the results of the
party's nominating convention
at the County Center.
Following the clashes
between supporters of the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC), and the opposition New Patriotic
Party (NPP), on Sunday morning
at Koforidua Effiduase, both
parties have
issued separate statements, condemning the act.
There was also the somewhat unfortunate tale - reported widely - about an alleged attempt by the Tories to engender a «gentlemen's agreement»
between the
parties at Cardiff Bay not to raise the
issue of each others» expense claims.
Following months of negotiations
between the TIFIA JPO and the Borrower, the
parties executed two new TIFIA loans on November 6, 2013 which refinanced all of the exiting LA - 1 debt as follows: (i)
issue a $ 78 million TIFIA loan
at the rural rate of one - half the 30 - year US Treasury rate to refinance the existing 2005 TIFIA Loan; (ii)
issue an additional $ 44 million TIFIA loan
at the full 30 - year US Treasury rate to refinance a portion of the senior debt.
In
between messages about the closing
party they're hosting
at SXSW, comiXology has taken to Twitter to keep people aware that they're working on the
issue and, it appears, try to lighten the mood somewhat:
By default this will return to a certain standing depending on how a
party feels about you, but more can be gained by
issuing edicts that
parties approve of, building certain things and by going through the events that pop up where you're given the chance to pick
between a few options that typically increase your goodwill with one part
at the cost of another.
Both these
issues remain unclear, and have been the source for considerable disagreement
between various
parties at UN talks.
Led by the firm's head of real estate Andrew Bembridge, the deal was made even more challenging by the fact it was a share sale transaction and there were no warranties on the underlying environmental state of the properties, requiring extensive due diligence procedures from all
parties (including ensuring that representations made
at interviews
between the buyer and seller on environmental
issues were not binding).
[126] Therefore, the rule is not limited to negotiations aimed
at resolving the legal
issues between the
parties but applies to any negotiations aimed
at avoiding or reducing the scope of litigation, irrespective of whether they directly address or seek to resolve the relevant legal
issues.
If the exclusion clause applies, the second
issue is whether the exclusion clause was unconscionable
at the time the contract was made, «as might arise from situations of unequal bargaining power
between the
parties» (Hunter,
at p. 462).
The outstanding
issue at that point was the question as to whether all of the various rights and principles contained in the Charter are capable of deployment
between private
parties.
At that time, disputes involving numerous contested facts, and particularly cases where credibility
issues existed
between the
parties, would rarely be dealt with by means of summary judgment.
Second, the moving
parties argued that Justice Newbould erred in finding that an agreement which addressed transfer pricing tax
issues between certain Nortel debtors while they were engage in ongoing operations (the «Master R&D Agreement» or «MRDA»), and which had formed the basis of the appellants» theory of allocation
at trial, was never intended to and did not govern the allocation of the Lockbox Funds.
In the case
at issue the request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) in 2016 in the context of a dispute
between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract
between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third -
party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goods.
Furthermore, when expert evidence
at trial is necessary, the
issues and any areas of disagreement
between experts for the
parties are usually clear, reducing the time the expert has to spend
at court.
If these tools do not result in a resolution, the Tribunal will provide online negotiation and case management services to resolve, or
at least to narrow, the
issues and to facilitate communication and information sharing
between the
parties.
Many times, the judge will make an order about an
issue at a settlement conference based on consent agreements
between the two
parties.
He found that these facts did not warrant undermining the reliability of s. 169 (3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), which allows the CRA to
issue reassessments to dispose of an appeal with the written consent of a taxpayer and is consistently, frequently and reliably used by
parties to arrive
at terms of settlement
between themselves and to conclude appeals with finality.
The husband in question opposed the motion, arguing that he would no longer receive medical benefits from the wife's insurer once they were divorced and wanting all outstanding
issues between the
parties to be addressed
at the same time.
In a decision that addresses several international litigation
issues, the trial court dismissed
at least one major action
between the
parties.
If proceedings are ongoing in an English court
between the
parties at the time when one of the
parties seeks recognition or enforcement of a foreign judgment on the same
issue (s), the English court is likely to stay the English proceedings until the judgment creditor's claim for recognition and enforcement has been determined.
As this was
at the interim stage, the court did not have to decide the
issues between the
parties, only holding that it was arguable that the company had a good case and that the balance of convenience was in its favour.
[139] As indicated by the Divisional Court in Godfrey v. Ontario Police Commission,
at paragraph 41, «[i] n the traditional labour relations context, matters or
issues of employee discipline are essentially a private matter
between the
parties».
A second consent order, made on January 7, 2014, provided that the Respondents would be
at liberty to argue in the action that when the court is determining the
issue of equalization
between the
parties, the Appellant should be required to pay interest on the Roberts Creek mortgage.
The overriding objective favoured a speedy trial of
issues and a court should not discipline lawyers
at the expense of justice being achieved
between the
parties.
Private arbitration of disputes
between contractual
parties may be very appealing if trade secrets are
at issue, to avoid unnecessary disclosure of the confidential information in the course of litigation in the courts.
Creighton says it's the relationship
between those people and their potential clients and what they can send or not send — particularly third -
party referrals — that were
at issue for the company.
For every Minute (or administrative instruction) or policy statement that is
issued in one department, there is a set of communications that must then occur
between departments
at national office, state / territory office and, ICC levels, in order to ensure that there is «joined up government», with all
parties made aware.
The Traditional Divorce Settlement model looks different in different cases but tends to be more pared down than Collaborative Divorce, usually because the
parties have a very uncomplicated financial estate, they do not have children together, there are no potentially problematic emotional / relational
issues at play
between the
parties, or some combination of all three.
Through mediation, the
parties work together in a confidential, informal setting to discuss and resolve the
issues between them
at a fraction of the cost, with the assistance of a trained attorney - mediator.
Some
issues can arise during the sale of property that may cause an inequitable situation
between the two divorcing
parties, says Peggy Spiro, broker - owner
at Spiro Realty Group in Erie, Colo..
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third
party beneficiary of lease agreement
between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification
between the
parties and did not expressly set forth that one
party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable
issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the
parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the
parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant
at which the lease terms were finalized