Sentences with phrase «at judging other»

Not only are you much better at judging other people, but you also know yourself much better.

Experiments have shown that «people are very good at judging each other,» she says.

Also I'm most of the time very good at judging others to some kind of standard that I expect people to live by, meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some kind of control over them.

«Judge not though ye» be judged», but Christians are the world's worst at judging others.

Not exact matches

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, saiAt the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, saiat the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

And yet, that might not at all be the best way to judge other people's emotions.

When the collection of major works housed at the city's world - class Detroit Institute of Arts Museum was in danger of being liquidated to pay off municipal debt, the federal mediator, Judge Gerald Rosen, city emergency manager, Kevyn Orr, and other civic leaders leaned heavily on community and national foundations, lawmakers and the museum itself to put their money where their masterpieces were.

It will also look at comments directed to the show's Twitter account and crawl the site for keywords, like «Kevin O'Leary» or the names of the other judges.

The trial judge said the law is at odds with Section 121 of the Constitution Act, which reads «All articles of the growth, produce, or manufacture of any one of the provinces shall, from and after the union, be admitted free into each of the other provinces.»

In doing so, Judge Weinstein effectively affirmed the CFTC's 2015 finding that bitcoin and other virtual currencies are «properly defined» as commodities, a pivotal interpretation that could set a standard for cryptocurrency prosecution at large.

And we've looked at other areas in the travel space, to judge whether we should do it.»

This combination of damaged trust and stable everyday service is difficult to judge, but we recommend that you take a long look at your many other lender options before settling with Wells Fargo for your mortgage.

And, if I didn't quite get the law right, or misinterpreted what the judge said, neither of which was unusual, I always had Posner or one of my other colleagues at the Law School to straighten me out.

The Nunes Memo reportedly alleges that at least a dozen FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors fabricated evidence, engaged in a criminal conspiracy to commit perjury, lucked out on being randomly assigned Judge Low Blood Sugar who looked the other way, and — coincidentally — ended up obtaining evidence that justified extending the initial FISA surveillance.

«The other possibility there is that Uber realized that Mr. Levandowski was radioactive... and came up with some series of agreements that somehow would insulate Uber from any of that material ever being used at Uber,» Judge William Alsup said.

Also I am a Christian and I don't bash other people or other religions, actually I get looked down at because I don't, I have a gay friend, I have a Muslim friends and boy oh boy do the Christians try to talk to me about how wrong they are, this is what I say to them» I'm not God, God says pretty clear that we are NOT TO JUDGE any one, and I don't, I just love them for who they are.

Who are you to judge others as «good» or «evil» without some kind of standard to point at?

He objected that the issue of contraception was «superfluous» compared to others; he asked what right the priest had to tell him what to do («judge not lest you be judged,» Hannity instructed); and he expressed shock at the thought that anyone might deprive him of taking Communion just because he was deciding for himself what it means to be Catholic.

If we bare our souls, will others judge us and potentially avoid us at the next social gathering?

While I will agree that his ownership of slaves at all, which went back a few generations, was wrong, we often use today's morals to judge others from a previous era.

At the other end of the spectrum, one might treat phrases like «equal protection» and «free speech» as an invitation to judges to fashion whatever rules best serve the general values that the phrases suggest: equality, free expression, and so forth.

Legal academics have argued that this sort of harm strikes at the heart of the common good, and that judges should count it against the moral and religious liberty claims of those seeking to avoid complicity with others» sins.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three - judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»

A federal judge has temporarily issued a restraining order blocking the rule from going into effect on December 19, but this law (and several other similar restrictions proposed) present an opportunity for Christians to look closely at the issue and consider what role we play and how we can serve women.

the one is the old theocratic messianic title, given to anointed kings in ancient times; the other is the new apocalyptic title of the heavenly Man, the celestial Anthropos, Urmensch, the Primal Man, who is to appear at the end of days, raise the dead, and judge the whole world — angels, demons, and men.

Others see him presented to the reader as the Son of man, who will return at the end of time to judge everyone for his or her deeds (Meier).

If so, why was it ok for God to judge there, and not at other times?

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

It is often easy to look at other people's decisions and judge them, thinking that we know clearly what is right and what is wrong and that if we were in their shoes, we would have known what was the right thing to do.

You came by this so - called truth arbitrarily (if you did not, please feel free to explain how you evaluated thousands of interpretations against one another and managed to discern which one was the real truth), and then YOU PRESUME TO JUDGE OTHERS based on a «truth» you arrived at arbitrarily.

which deals with the angels sorting out the good and the bad at the time of judgement, and not of ordinary christians judging others as not «real» christians.

Us pagans believe we are endowed with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.

If Jesus is the eschatological judge, then no other can stand in his place; if he is the revealer of God's primordial will, then no other can perform that function; if he appears at the apex of God's history of salvation, then no other can occupy that position.

We could call this problem the «legalization» of debate, meaning not whether something is legal, but instead the conversion of moral, social, religious, and other dimensions of an issue into legal, or legalistic, terms, or at least the neglect of them because of a focus on what the judges will say.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

This does not mean that there is a point at which accommodation and neutrality converge (although there may be); it means only that as time and cases go by, the state - centeredness of what we are bold to call religious freedom is more and more apparent, and the pressure on religionists to conform to the expectations of others grows and grows, with the inevitable complicity of the judges who supposedly protect religion's «right» to be free.

Since all will rise at the same time, one will observe the judgment of the others and in some cases even influence it: «Your sons» who are exorcists «shall be your judges....

When they quote such a verse at us, we think that since it is Scripture, it must mean what the world says it means, and so we refrain from judging others, without ever looking up the passage to see what it really says.

And you better take a better look at that «judging others» part.

Must not these truth claims, like all other truth claims, be judged at the court of reason?

But I've never been one to judge because it takes two people to stay in a relationship but only one to desire a divorce, and you never know exactly which of the two people would have stayed «in the game» at any cost but the decision was made by the other party.

The Lord God answers through his Son Jesus Christ in Romans 2:16 - You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

Please let's not judge lest we will be judged, on the other hand Mr. Obama we are supposed to pray to God all the time, in health and in sickness, and in the time of election or at any other time, May God Bless America, Governor Romney and President Obama, so the best for the Country would win

Many are drawn from the Catechism; others, for example St Theresa of Avila on being judged at the end by «One whom we have loved above all things», are welcome and enriching additions.

John Kasich argues that our nation will be judged by how well it cares for the «least of these,» and that staunch Presbyterian, Donald Trump, flashes his personal Bible at rallies, a gift from that other stalwart predestinarian, Norman Vincent Peale.

Reacting to the judgement, Dr Saunders said: «Conway has a terminal condition but that didn't seem to deter the judges in any way... it was pretty clear that they had put a huge amount of weight on the medical evidence and the evidence from disabled people about how any change couldn't be controlled and they'd also looked at what had happened in other jurisdictions».

I am always willing to present my perspective (something I do on this blog) and talk with others who are still in that system, but I try not to judge or condemn them for where they are at.

1:1 - 7); the other tribes» battles against Benjamin (Judges 20); David's victory and escape at Keilah (1 Sam.

My advice, pray for this guy and other CEO and understand that God leads people in a personal manner so who are we to judge answer think we are doing a better job at advancing the Gospel.

As the U.S. Catholic bishops acknowledge, churches must judge themselves by moral standards that are at least as rigorous as those to which they would hold other corporations accountable.