Sentences with phrase «at least a question as»

Not exact matches

But at least some of what the service is going through raises questions not just about its core value — namely, that it's run by musicians for musicians — but also about its long - term prospects as a competitive streaming business.

At least that's the thinking at Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questionAt least that's the thinking at Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questionat Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questions.

As Congress returns from recess this week, the big question is whether the shooting in Parkland, Florida, which killed at least 17 people, and injured more than a dozen others, will push Congress to actually do something on guns.

Of course, a question at least as big is: Does the president - elect devote even a fraction of a synaptic pulse to Canada?

The half of adult kids that do question Mom and Dad's financial prowess cite woeful retirement savings and inefficient use of savings options as their biggest concerns, according to the Fidelity survey, which polled households with at least $ 100,000 in savings.

White is pointing to certain questions that financial professionals are asking, such as: Does having a net worth of at least $ 1 million or individual income of at least $ 200K necessarily mean you are a «sophisticated» investor, especially if you've never invested before?

He's had lots of practice, including internal training and weekly Q&A s with Facebook employees that doubled, at least early on, as practice sessions for Zuckerberg to get comfortable taking questions in front of a crowd.

Whether it all works as he expects is a different question, but at least he knows what he wants to do.

Now, I would never have thought of this as being a potential question or reasonable consideration until I saw a pair of recent «quitting Facebook» blog posts gaining some level of virality (at least in the marketing industry).

The question of women's ordination is regarded as church - dividing, at least from the Orthodox angle... Consequently I think we on the Lutheran side have to think about whether progress in dialogue is to be expected at all.»

The errors in estimating the costs of the war, the incompetent planning for the occupation, and the failure to understand the sheer length of the commitment are at least as important in understanding questions of when, if, and how, the U.S. should get into wars.

@ Derrick Yu, This actually may come as a shocker, but there are believers out there who still continue to ask questions about God, about the Universe, and so forth, and unlike certain atheists out there who if they can't get definite answers to just come to conclusions that can not be verified like conclude that there is no God, at least there are believers out there who at least are willing to at least be open to the possibility that there is a God, and from there they develop their faith, which even though is not a perfect knowledge, at least can help keep those minds open, unlike certain atheists who take the easy way out and convincing themselves that it is a fact that there is no God, when in reality it is not a fact at all.

Donald Cole, who used to host the Open Line Bible Answer Call in Radio Show says that without fail, he receives at least one, sometimes as many as five questions about eternal security during every single show.

Tony Jones has had a lot of opportunities then and since to be specific in responding to (what I see as) legitimate questions — as he was and is a public figure — but rarely has done so online, at least to my knowledge.

Nevertheless, when it comes to the water baptism, you know, the outward sign of the internal stuff, I believe there is another answer to the question why Jesus» disciples never immersed «in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit «(as in Mt 28:19), at least is not recorded in the Acts, but «in the name of the Lord Jesus «(as in whole book of Acts, starting from 2:38).

Ehud Barak's insouciant assurance that he can procure an acceptable peace with the Arabs on his own terms has shown itself, at least to date, to be a most imprudent policy» which is why his position as leader of the nation is, as I write, seriously in question.

Then there arises the problem known as theodicy, the question of how to justify the goodness of God when God either directly brings about evil or at least appears to permit evil to exist.

This question of the physical evil in the world leads us naturally on to the question of moral evil, which poses at least as difficult a question, even though it is sometimes argued that they are but different manifestations of the same thing.

Strangely, just as welfare states are drowning in a sea of debt whilst also increasingly being seen as at least partly responsible for lower levels of family formation and employment, the Church has started to question welfare states rather less.

I've found that the answers to questions such as these (those which ring true, at least) tend to be those which are arrived at in my own way and own time, rather than being delivered by others.

Catholic clergy and laity seem to accept the use of microphones at Mass without question as something good, or at least as an inevitable feature of the electronic environment in which we all now live and move, as fish swim in water.

Here is my question, how come all the Belief Blog commentators take a decidedly liberal view of Christianity (if not actually opposed to it)... at least as far as «gay marriage» is concerned?

If it is as widely read and discussed as it deserves to be, I Am Charlotte Simmons will at least encourage parents to ask more searching questions during the recruitment process, and to make informed choices among educational institutions.

This question is important for Whiteheadians also, since they regard actual entities as discontinuous at least insofar as they are discrete entities.

Questions have been asked by church members and at least one other congregation, as is their right in the United Church.

If Carter has an inadequate full - employment policy, as I think he does, at least we're discussing what kind of full - employment policy and not the idiotic question of whether there should be one.»

The question in fact arises how it is possible to conceive the development of a being that consists in producing as its term something that is higher than itself, or at least leads towards such self - transcendence.

The most pressing question for Muslims in many lands is how to order the life of the community in a society that is not governed according to Muslim law and in which Muslims must conceive of their religion, at least in part, as equivalent to a voluntary association.

There will be no questioning as to whether I have won men (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having by my own efforts done the least thing toward winning them); no questioning as to whether, by the talk I have gained some earthly advantage (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having myself done the least thing toward gaining it); no questioning about what results I have produced, or whether I may have produced no results at all, or whether loss and the sport that others made of me were the only results I have produced.

But at least one question remains as basic and elemental for us as it was for Niebuhr: Is the object of our theological inquiry the actuality of life in, with and before the living God, or have we pushed this primary reality aside?

This reality may be more or less obvious, it may speak to us more or less distinctly, but it is there, at least as a question.

So many questions, but we don't get to choose the word of the year (The runner - up is «nostalgia» which also seems just about as old as time itself, but at least it's entered sort of a boom season, so that makes a little more sense).

This real word is present to us in the connection and unity of all individual words and confronts us with reality as a whole, at least as a question.

The question presupposes that the law does not say that, at least as I read it.

Supposing the word «God» had disappeared without leaving any visible gap and without being replaced by another word which would have a similar effect on us, which would pose at least the one fundamental question, even though we do not want to give or hear this word as an answer.

At the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facAt the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facat least latent or implicit in that empirical fact.

while it is impossible to discuss this controversy here, it is at least worth noting that it is not irrelevant to the question whether one historical revelation may be taken as an advance over others.)

While Platt puts his faith in the resourcefulness of the sciences to solve human problems, he highlights the importance of the value question at least implicitly by his insistence on the necessity of reordering the priorities by which we as a society invest our talents.

He at least feels that the «calling in question», the denials, the stark affirmation of the «end of sheer transcendence, sheer moralism, sheer power» (as I like to put it), has been accomplished.

He says he views the first three Father John Misty albums as a sort of informal trilogy, but there's likely at least one theme that will carry through to the next one: lyrics that ask questions.

As Hunter seeks to deal with the question in reference to his own pastoral practice, he concludes that there is indeed something of a witness to the gospel in interchanges named by his five principles, but that it is an incomplete witness at best, and one which may also profoundly distort the gospel message, at least as that message is clarified by means of Moltmann's theologAs Hunter seeks to deal with the question in reference to his own pastoral practice, he concludes that there is indeed something of a witness to the gospel in interchanges named by his five principles, but that it is an incomplete witness at best, and one which may also profoundly distort the gospel message, at least as that message is clarified by means of Moltmann's theologas that message is clarified by means of Moltmann's theology.

This question, of course, was at least as important to Locke as the problem of insufficient factual knowledge regarding the interaction of physical objects.

And again, no one has answered the questions at least as far as I can see, as to which of Obama; s actions are un-Christian?

Science dose not provide all the answers either but it looks for the answers and more importantly, when science gives an answer you do not have to except it on Faith, you are required to test it, question it and verify it until you are satisfied that the answer is right (at least right as far as we know now, it may change as we learn more).

The question is no doubt intended to trip up Jesus, or at least to expose him as playing free and loose with the religion of Israel.

Indeed, it happens so often that it raises serious questions about the other approaches, at least insofar as they try to proceed — ever so carefully and judiciously, they suppose — without this central point up front.

At the very least the question of whether various ceremonies and ideologies should be regarded as rituals and theologies is clarified if a plausible reason can be given as to why they can be.

And Jesus gave expression to this devaluation in his own life: he broke the Sabbath when he felt that God bade him act; he excused his disciples (at least) from the custom of fasting; and the burning national question whether one had really to pay the poli tax to the foreign power of occupation (in Judea and Samaria) he answered in the affirmative, but he viewed it as a secular concern and pointed his questioners to the essential duty, «Give to God what belongs to him.»

It doesn't look as gorgeous as yours, hoping that it at least tastes as good;) I have an important question though.

Peter Laufer: Yes, except in the environment that we have and the type capitalism we practice the regulatory agency in question which is the USDA, the United States Department of Agriculture; the National Organic Program, the NOP, is serving business at least as much as it's servicing the rest of us and maybe more and it's the position of the USDA that if companies like Trader Joe's or others decide that the origin of their products is a proprietary business tool, then they are successfully able to hide behind that claim and not tell you where something you're going to buy and eat came from.