Sentences with phrase «at least another point then»

We go into this game on the back of three consecutive victories, and if we manage at least a point then we will have remained unbeaten in five games, which cover the whole of the month of October.
A rare win for Blackburn this season was enough to lift Rovers away from the relegation zone, four points clear in fact, but if they don't follow that big win up with at least another point then Blackburn cold find themselves embracing the red zone once again.

Not exact matches

The report points out that, although 68 % of billionaires hold at least a four - year degree, a sheepskin «is not a prerequisite to then go on and amass a billion - dollar fortune,» since one in three billionaires either never went to college at all or didn't stick around to finish.
They have a point, but if we are not going to do that, which we are not — at least not yet — then we must get the oil to market.
by Recently the volatility in US stock markets has been extreme to say the least, with intra-day volatility in the Dow Jones index an astounding 2,588 points on Monday and experiencing another intraday rollercoaster of more than 1,246 points yesterday (up 434 points at market open, down 313 points, then up 499 points).
What makes the message of Mystic River doubly powerful is that the audience knows Dave is innocent (of this particular crime at least) and can only watch as his former friend first stabs him and then shoots him at point blank range.
If enough people are encouraged to hate the Jews to a point where they want them wiped off the face of the earth, then part of the «prophecy» has been fulfilled (or at least the catalyst is present).
It is so easy for people to judge, but till you have something like this happens in our life, then we can understand, my son ended his life 6 years ago, we had no sign of anything, any of all the parents or not parents pointing the finger at this family, shame on you cuz, things happen when you least expect them, if we had known what to do, do you think we would not have done it.
’32 If Jewish tradition, as we have earlier seen, could reach the point of elevating Moses to a place in heaven even though the scriptures clearly referred to his death and burial, then the disciples had only to com, to the conviction that Jesus was at least on a par with Moses in order to draw the conclusion that the crucified Jesus too had been exalted to heaven.
To make the point more strongly, I know of at least four priests who have come from families who were not practising when they were brought for baptism as infants, but who through the influence of a school, or priests, teachers or grandparents were led to strong and deep faith and then to ordination.
Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»
Our discussion will be guided by the following question: If Jesus Christ overcomes the distortions of sin, at least to the point that reason can acknowledge the grace and providence of God, is it then possible to move beyond the confines of the circle of faith for further witness to and verification of the faith?
If Christian theology said that this did not exist, then Christian theology, at least on this point, was simply wrong.
Not only that, but the idea that humans and animals developed to some point then were all but eliminated from the earth just does not line up with what we think we know of the history of the earth, at least as far as timing.
If God is a creator ex nihilo, then there was a point where God had not yet produced his creation, or at least this is the popular conception.
I fell in love at that point and have since then popped in at least once a week to check for new posts.
Thankfully, most modern slow cookers do get hot enough to bring beans to a boil, and if the beans are at the boiling point for at least 10 minutes, then there's no concern.
At least Tottenham drew, and if Chelsea draw too then we are 9 points behind.
A 12 points gap is certainly a stretch, but if the team shows the fighting spirit that Shearer and the fans of Arsenal so desperately want, then at least we can finish the season in a stronger fashion.
if you are really good enough to win the title and have players really up for it and a manager who knows how to bring out the best in them then YOU FIND A WAY to score the goals needed to get at least 6 points from 12... bottom line is this... AFC under Wenger has a loser mentality, SIMPLE..
From there it was smooth sailing for the Tigers as they beat Albany «by at least 30 points» in the semis then King - Berkeley «by at least 30 points» in the finals.
So thats three points at least in last two games down to Aguero, but then he is world class and that is what we need, a world class striker.
power and stamina we will have to see how we do in the run in, if we can put at least 5 to 10 point between us and man city, then that will increase our chances of winning the league by a lot more.
The other issue not really discussed is that if the premise is that KH got over on these other GMs then that would at least point to the fact that either our organization / system helped these players put up their numbers or that the broader view is these players (i.e. Smith) aren't as good as the Wings organization / leadership thought they were in the first place.
if United, City or Chelsea drop 2 or 3points now they ll still be topping us but if we drop any more points we are unofficially outta the title race cos then it's gonna be 7 or 8points away from at least 2 of those three contenders.
Hopefully we can pick up at least four points off Everton, and City, and then kick on because we have pretty easy fixtures after City until Chelsea in early February.
Forget Walcott so to get 3 points once in front close out game in the 60 th minute to bring on Chambers for Ozil as if he has done his job we should be at least 2 up then you leave Welbeck up front and for the quick over turn bring on Ramsey for Coquelen, but not for moving Sanches out to left its his weakest position.
Right once again I've have to clarify I'm not an aob or akb and I am by no means defending him, He should of signed a striker and a defensive midfielder or at least one of them even if he felt we needed one or not, but I do have to say we have a very good squad this is a better squad than stayed 1st longer then anyone else a few seasons ago and with cech I say a better squad then earned more points then anybody in the 2nd half of the season.
Oddsmakers feel pretty confident that Newcastle won't be relegated, and if that's the case, then they should get to at least 40 points on the year.
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
Typically these periods in past few seasons has seen us chasing the top table team with average of 10 points, then comes our end of season charge which has seen us gaining more points than any other EPL team in the final two months of the season, over the past few years at least.
It really felt like a turning point and if Tottenham can help us out by at least stopping Chelsea from winning then I think the way that the Gunners came back from the dead will give the players a huge boost and will give us fans reason to believe that the fighting spirit, or lack of it, that has been one of the big problems in recent years, really is there.
If we acknowledge that our squad is better or at least as good as Chelsea's then there can only be three reasonable excuses for being 9 points behind them in the league.
I'm sorry to disagree on this but unless it is physically possible for us to ascertain a WC striker, or at the very least, a striker who offers something vastly different, then there is NO point wasting money on them.
we would have sit top for 24 hours at least now we will be 6 points by sunday and If we lose then 9.
We tend to buy the players on august 31, until then we lose at least 4 points.
Maybe well reveal our top 10 rookie Bears seasons at some point this off season... Then again, Dane would have to increase our stipend by at least 6 pounds of sausage and an extra case of PBR for us to do that extra research.
Be glad when the transfer window shuts and we can draw a close to these simpleton wish - lists — perhaps we get back to moaning about what we have instead of moaning about who we should get — at least till the January window — god help us then if we are not 12 points clear at the top.
If Arsenal can take at least 3 points from Chelsea, City and United then yes Arsenal can win the EPL.
Bearing in mind the number of points that Arsenal pick up against smaller teams, if we pick at least 4 points from each of the teams in the top 6 — then definitely we win the League.
Point precisely Wenger is trying to build the team around ozil and wild her instead of Ramsey like he did to an extent last season he is going through a tough time and I think he should remove his pride and actually listen at least then well know he tried and failed
At least he's finally dropped Santi, but then again, how long did that take and how many points did it cost us?
Noted fringe - botherer Roberto Mancini has been sacked as manager of Manchester City, apparently for gross disappointment, and Malaga's Manuel Pellegrini is expected to replace him imminently, or at least shortly, or if not shortly then at some point in the not - too - distant.
If not a W, then at least to play a really solid Game and get to a point where they know they can Win.
They averaged 103.9 points in March after averaging at least 112.0 in each previous month this season, then began April by scoring 117 in a win over Phoenix.
If we fail to at least close the gap to within six points of the leaders before they try and overcome an in - form Spurs side, then we may as well call it quits on our challenge.
If you have no control or influence over the decisions of a third party multi-national business and they are making decisions you don't like then get wise to the fact, make your point then either do something about it yourself or at least stop slagging off those who are in a similar position with no control but choose to behave differently.
winning to Man City is seen by some as a prowess and the resurgence of WENGERS glory days, well I don't see it that way, some see it as an outstanding victory first because we were not beaten merciless and then we scratched a win to a Man City that btw is not at it's best... we had an awful game yesterday, yes we got the points but unconvincing to say the least... WENGER is willing to change!!!!!!??? YES only when pressure mounted and for the first time his job was questioned, why did not happen before, we all know that the stubborn deluded man would have change nothing on his own accord if it wasn't because he was against the ropes....
Another point I was making is that with a decent CEO then a club can make profit AND spend, example being UTD who was bought by a money grabbing yank, they now make a profit and compete for the EPL title (well at least showing real contention this season).
However, when it comes to the correct score, then 1 - 1 is favourite at 5/1, and I would be happy to leave South Wales with at least a point.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z