Sentences with phrase «at least better understand»

What can law schools do differently to help students retain or at least better understand the importance of legal history?

Most of all, even if we couldn't agree in what we believe, I shall have better at least a better understanding through this amicable exchange.

Not exact matches

Quite apart from the argument over OSFI - style oversight, the former federal official and others stress this segment of the market at least requires more transparency and clearer data so regulators and the Bank of Canada can better understand the credit landscape and the extent of high - risk loans issued by private lenders.

co is that is generally understood to mean «company,» (well, at least this far north of Colombia) and hence is unlikely to create confusion.

It's key to understand how these boomers wish to approach retirement — as a delayed adventure, as a well - deserved rest — and then help them see how they can accomplish that plan, or at least a version of it.

But in the Harvard research, the women understood perfectly well the benefits of having power, or at least understood them the same way that the men did.

Another Reddit user responded: «I understand that some people genuinely have to limit their salt intake as much as possible (McDonald's isn't really the best place to practice that sort of diet, but hey, not my life) but for me, at least, it's easy to tell who genuinely needs it salt free and who's just trying to get the freshest fries they can.»

Smaller businesses tend to have more flexible bonus structures than their large counterparts and many are planning on holding back bonus money at least until they get a better understanding of where things are going, Alter says.

At the very least, considering opposite opinions on issues broadens our perspective and helps us to better understand others.

When the next debate emerges on whether Canada should accept a large investment from Asia, we will at least be able to start with a better understanding of the underlying data.

At least in the case of Sikh separatism in India, there are influential and articulate members of both sides of the debate over an independent «Khalistan,» so we have a better chance of properly understanding the issue.

If I have a better understanding of the outcome, ie, what a Scenario looks like once developed, it will give me a better handle on how to develop it, or at least a path to learn the right way how to actually develop one.

As we did in our annual, more global study, we spent a good deal of time in this research looking at the differences between the marketers who rate themselves highly in terms of overall content marketing effectiveness (the «most effective») versus those who rate themselves as least effective to understand the gaps and identify best practices for paid content promotion.

To better understand green bond performance and valuations in the secondary market, Morgan Stanley analyzed 121 self - labeled U.S. and European bonds, focusing on corporate, and government or government - related benchmark - size securities (at least $ 500 million).

Wipe those tears from your eyes, I understand it's embarrassing to get publicly humiliated but I hope at least some good can come from this and you'll learn to keep your mouth shut once and a while and learn.

@tf — I know better than to expect you to understand the relevant science here, but Strobel was at the very least, negligent in publishing such a misrepresentation.

Quite the contrary, I learned a lot, and now have a better understanding as to how some, or at least this one particular «polygamist family» works.

Such a survey will also demonstrate the need for at least a basic grounding in philosophy, if we are to better understand and communicate the mysteries of our faith.

I will also try to establish, or at least render plausible, the view that while the distinction between a logic of reason and a logic of the understanding may have been one that was necessary and legitimate for Hegel to maintain, it has, given developments in modern logic, as well as changes in the modern view of the nature of metaphysical thinking, become obsolescent.

Ok, well at least you understand one situation in which somebody might want to kill another human.

He will not be content with the blessed assurance which comforts beyond all measure: that eternally the Good has always been victorious; the blessed assurance which is a security that passeth all understanding; the blessed assurance that the unprofitable servant may have within himself at each moment, even when the time is the longest and he seems to have accomplished least of all, the blessed assurance which allows the unprofitable servant if he loses honor to speak more proudly than that royal word: All is lost save honor.

We understand very well — at least I hope we do — that owing to the principles of Protestantism this question is difficult to answer.

because your understand of science eclipses that of the god of the bible, gone would be the stone age morality — slavery, animal sacrifice, destroying whole segments of populations for absolutely insane reasons - at least I hope it would be better:)

The fact that people can be easily duped is not a good thing, of course, but knowing that this is true can at least help us understand the world we live in.

I think my congregation might have done better — or at least might have understood what was happening — if it had received some of the information that came to the conference participants at Honolulu.

But to understand, at least in part, is to be strengthened in the knowledge of our own capacity for both good and evil» and of our radical dependence on the One who, despite His understanding all, forgives the penitent.

Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees from state college (I mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).

But even if one does not wish to baptize this principle, it is now at least clear that there are many stunning, and as of yet not well - understood physical coincidences that needed to be present in order for life to evolve.

sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».

No, spiritually understood, he has by his venture cared for them in the best possible way, for by this he has shown them that he at least has faith in Providence.

As I have warned so often, there is here no guarantee of any particular social good, but at least there is ground for hope that in ways beyond our present understanding the powers of the «age to come,» the work of the living Christ, the influence of the Holy Spirit, the impact of that within the church which Paul Tillich calls the «New Being» will break through many of the obstacles in the secular order to transform and transform again the kingdoms of this world.

In my view there is at least today a distinct experience and teaching in Catholic theology according to which God must be understood as the all - efficient Giver who gives himself both the potency of freedom and its good act according to his grace that is neither derived nor compelled, and which nothing in man precedes.

I am not sure why Satan and his angels ever thought they could defeat God by rebelling against him, but we must believe that they know God at least as well — if not better — than we do, and so the lack of understanding must be ours.

At the very least, Lenny Belardo is a fascinating character study, demanding to be better understood in his unpredictability.

As for the treatment of homosexuality, it would seem that Burtchaell's wistful hope that «maybe the folks over there are understanding things a little better now» must remain, at least for the present, just a hope.

In an attempt to respond to this set of circumstances, the primary strategy, at least for churches in the mainstream, has been to try to help people come to a better understanding of what it means to be a Christian.

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

But on the whole, there is enough evidence at least to suggest that, if one wants to have both a market economy and democracy, it is better to have the former precede the latter» if you will, to have perestroika before glasnost (it being understood, of course, that Gorbachev had something other than full capitalism in mind with the former term, and something less than full democracy with the latter).

It is not my intention to defend everything the encyclical tradition has had to say about sex and marriage but rather to point out that that tradition, especially in Arcanum Divinae, at least had the argument in the right ball park — namely, that what one says about sex is correlative to one's understanding of the nature of the family and what its function is for the preservation of good societies.

I think you need a philosophy 101 course, or at least a bit better understanding of what is being claimed by theists.

The system of checks and balances they built in the Constitution was formed not only by the recognition that good citizens may differ over the proper course of action, but also, at least in part, by the Biblical understanding of humans as fallible and prone to wrong - doing, and therefore frequently in need of some healthy opposition from their fellows.

Disagreement about theology is one thing, but I take it that from your perspective, material truth is all that you can understand (for the time being, at least), and the notion of anyone claiming to believe (or better yet experience) other truths is abhorrent to you.

Understand that a good number of us were once christian or at least believers of some form.

I think the best way of understanding cosmic purpose in our loose sense is to propose that it consists essentially in the aim toward beauty.3 Perhaps from the limitedness of our own perspective we can say no more, but at least we can say this much.

It also shows, contrary to Inherit the Wind, that he was familiar with Darwin, and may even have understood the evolutionary doctrine better than his adversaries, or at least had a better idea of what was really at stake.

At least, the Bible provides a better clue to understanding the corruption of legislators and voting habits than do John Locke and Thomas Jefferson.

That would at least give people a better understanding of, as Hawking professes, it was all just random.

Significant contributions to this pivotal understanding were provided, at least in nuce, by such varied individuals as the Wesley brothers, the American reformer Alexander Campbell, and Søren Kierkegaard, as well as Albrecht Ritschl and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin among others.

I realize this may not be clear or meaninful to some readers and I can't take the space here to go into it other than to say that a good segment of biblical scholarship for a couple decades at least, has properly broadened its pursuits in an interdisciplinary manner, into probing for better understandings of the nature and formative, growth processes of the earliest groups of Jesus followers and how they ultimately became Jewish Christian groups, or started as mixed Jewish / Gentile groups (as via Paul, et al.).

For example, if leaders are learning from the experts in the field, they will be in a better position to challenge pastors to read at least one recommended book a year that will help them better understand the dynamics of abuse.