Sentences with phrase «at least enough people»

Not exact matches

For most people the battery will last long enough but, if you're a power user like me, be prepared to plug them in at least once during the day to sneak some extra juice.

As long as there are ultra-rich people, there will always be a few who value great journalism enough to bankroll it, or at least who see some advantage to themselves in doing so.

To visually connect, maintain eye contact for at least two to three seconds per person, or long enough to complete a full phrase or sentence.

At least one expert told Bloomberg that people may be reluctant to think about cereal as anything other than a breakfast food, at least not in numbers large enough to end the sales slump, which is expected to continue at least through 202At least one expert told Bloomberg that people may be reluctant to think about cereal as anything other than a breakfast food, at least not in numbers large enough to end the sales slump, which is expected to continue at least through 202at least not in numbers large enough to end the sales slump, which is expected to continue at least through 202at least through 2020.

While Musk is clearly smart enough to have considered all this already (or at least to pay someone else to consider it), Maynard ends with a word of caution for the SpaceX team: «If enough people feel SpaceX is threatening what they value (such as the environment — here or there), or disadvantaging them in some way (for example, by allowing rich people to move to another planet and abandoning the rest of us here), they'll make life difficult for the company.»

«People had been selling glasses online for at least 10 years before we got into it, and I think many didn't succeed because they weren't focused enough on the customer service.»

100 percent of the people you actually want to hire are smart enough to have at least 2 to 3 references who will rave about them no matter what.

But most people who spend $ 2,500,000 have enough smarts to make sure they hold operating profits at least flat to reach their base case payback period.

This rule will see at least one organization taken down by people who join for no other reason than to make a mockery of the organization if only because you've got enough cause heads at any major university to see it happen.

A right of autonomy broad enough to cover a woman's right to kill her offspring, declares the Ninth Circuit, is broad enough to cover (at the very least) a terminally ill person's right to determine the time and manner of death.

If enough people are encouraged to hate the Jews to a point where they want them wiped off the face of the earth, then part of the «prophecy» has been fulfilled (or at least the catalyst is present).

Most people are satisfied that their own faith is the true one or at least good enough to satisfy their religious and emotional needs.

Of course, there is persecution of people of faith, but most Christians in America have never experienced it in any meaningful way, at least not enough to invoke a battle posture.

Spiritual but not religious people are still brain - washed but at least they are not gullible enough to give their money to the child molesters at their church.

Insofar as people who make up a congregation are serious enough to be critically self - reflective about their own lives as acts of discipleship, they are doing theology, at least in an ad hoc and piecemeal way.

When these people arrive in the South, however, they usually can not find a liberal or moderate congregation in the local area, or at least not one large enough to offer the range of services they are accustomed to.

Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison people in attitudes that were suitable enough when science and technology were little dreamt of but which fail to illuminate a society in which, for instance, it is desirable, because of the effects of modern hygiene on death rates, for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third as many infants as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in which war might mean something like the end of the species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war of the past could be.

But could more people be fed if we all undertook the task of making an impact on at least one human being; absolutely, that is what Jesus said we must do, but instead we tend to criticize the efforts of those who are doing something as NOT ENOUGH when we could join them and DO MORE.

First of all, the poor are people without money, or at least, without enough money to live adequately within the context of Western society.

None of the numbers that people throw around here can be accepted without looking at alternative sources and double checking, but enough scholarly research can put us in the ballpark, at least for post-medieval periods.

We certainly can not enter into another person's soul, at least never sufficiently enough to judge without question what is there.

Biology seems to suggest that, for all of our empathetic features we still operate with a fairly instinctual pulse toward survival and self - serving fulfillment (or to at least live long enough to reproduce), so it's difficult for me to envision peace coming from within; but, I can submit myself to the communal disciplining of a peacemaking body of people who may, through rigorous training, shape me into the kind of person who can live peacefully amidst the insanity of never - ending traffic.

At least with an angry person you can have a conversation, because when people are upset, something in them is being challenged enough to raise their ire, and that's an engaged process and opens up the possibility of really great conversation.

Few churches have enough ill people to warrant such a program for only their own members, but an interdenominational arrangement may be feasible, at least in cities.

The good news is simply that we can, by caring enough for one another and our society put adjectives like «wrecked», «fallen» and «freakish» behind us — at least as we might apply them to people including ourselves.

To my niece, who lost her two - month old son to SIDS: «Well, at least you're young enough to have more children...» I showed huge amounts of restrain in not punching that person in the face.

I imagine the argument falling along the division between the people who would continue the American experiment and those who think that the experiment has gone far enough, and if I can't frame all the questions that might well be asked, I can think of at least a few:

Nope, don't hear of that happening... at least not often enough to convince me that these people truly believe one tenth of the woo they claim to believe in.

That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence before devoting either my time or energy on something.

'' That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by accepted scientific method.

There was a time in this country when stupid people at least had enough common sense not to engage in conversation about things that were way above their heads.

Well, for one, if I lived in the lower Bible Belt, I would be very thankful right now that between now and — well at least before Teddy R., people in the US of A were at least smart enough to let people be educated about the best that science had to offer at the time to allow this wonderful country to have great scientists in many fields.

Intellectually, we are at least advanced enough as a species to discard such silliness, but people too easily allow their better judgment to be clouded by emotion.

Really, Reality, don't you think that people who are on this discussion board would know enough to be able to either recite or at least research and provide correct answers to your arguments convoluted to avoid the truth?

But assuming they are wrong, it only proves there is a large group of people out in the world still that want desperately to believe in something greater than themselves and, most importantly, care enough about others to sacrifice of their own comforts to make sure others at least know about it and can decide for themselves.

And by obscenely large, I mean there better be enough to feed 10 plus people AND enough leftovers to feed me for at least three days post Thanksgiving.

by Kellye Hunter and Dave DeWitt The power of chiles is enough to inspire mythology and folk tales, so it is not surprising that some people believe in its ability to control our minds — or at least our bodies.

This recipe made enough for at least six people, so needless to say, with just the two of us, we had a lot left over.

I love this salad... I always volunteer this salad for potlucks... The recipe makes enough for at least 4 people.

That's probably enough baseball to tide people over for at least a few days.

We need to change some players, even if they are good players to make our game more dinamic, more complete.If Walcott will leave, definetly Sterling is the right choose to play with Sanchez.If Bayern will want Ozil, I think we should let him go.I think mutch people will be not agree with this, Ozil is a great player BUT is not a complete player, doesn't have enough speed and is seems sometimes like he is not involved in the game.I think a switch with Gotze can be benefic for our team, he run alot, is creative and make the defensive as well.We need a Striker to, but a good one, someone like Benzema or Cavani, someome who can get at least 20 goals per season.A new DM is what we need for balance the game, I think Vidal is the best in the world in this moment (is just my opinion), he working hard in defence and can win a game with a long shot.This is the way I see footbal.

^ ^ this article is about wilshere and his performance normally i have no problem with OT - comments but it annoys me a bit when people want to connect an article in a random way to comment they just love and want to keep making... look the hating and stating opinions about walcott is getting annoying, we all get it, walcott played piss - poor in the second half and was lacklustre but enough people have already written about his wage packet and his lacklustre performances at least let an article about wilshere stay one about wilshere and of course everybody should be able to write OT - comments but then it should at least be something new which wasnt already written like 100000 times in one single month: /

There's other people doing as much as they possibly can, and if I'm not doing at least as much as they are, plus a little bit more, I'm not doing enough.

That wasn't enough for the Rangers, who decided to blame at least some of their woes on their best player, eating more than $ 60 million just to exchange him for two years of Alfonso Soriano (and all the Joaquin Arias memories a person can handle.)

Xhaka, who I like, or at least I like the Xhaka who plays for the Swiss national squad, has shown to be in way over his head in the premiership... of course he showed late in the year that he can stretch the field with the long ball but our squad isn't really set - up for that style of play... most of his long passes are in the air not on the ground and our squad without Giroud, which should have been sold the minute the transfer window officially opened, is one of the smallest in England... we need someone who can pick out the runs of our forwards in the lanes and who is fast enough to come forward into space without conceding his defensive responsibilities... we rarely see him shoot or even be in a position on the field to do so, we rarely, if ever, see him used for set pieces and it appears that the only person at the club who has ever coached him up when it comes to tackling is Coq, which explains his atrocious disciplinary record... maybe it's me but didn't you see him coming in and contributing more from an offensive perspective, with his killer left foot, than a deep - lying midfielder... if that wasn't the case we are the stupidest team alive for taking him over Kante

If you get enough people together, chances are that there will be at least one social butterfly in the bunch.

I agree that it is a natural beautiful thing but I would hope that if you have children then you are adult enough to understand that there are differences in what people are comfortable with, and that you would at least have the decency to respect that.

It doesn't happen often, luckily enough — although I still hold a grudge against the mum who commented on me giving the toddler a biscuit, shock horror — but I think it's happened to most people I know at least once.

Therefore, they are made big enough for at least two people to fit in.

When you're arty you just want people to like your stuff enough to buy it or at least say its nice and mean it.