Sentences with phrase «at least my money went»

At least the money went to charity.

Not exact matches

Now let's be realistic — not everyone is going to be able to invest $ 1,000 and make $ 2,000 profit month after month, but the key is to at least explore PPC advertising as an option and be willing to invest some money to try it for a couple months.

In order for a few million dollars to go «missing» here and there, and end up in the pockets of local politicians or shady middle - men, you've pretty much got to be mislabelling the money at the very least.

He goes on to say that, in the absence of a willingness to learn about the market, investors should at least put their money with a qualified registered advisor so that there is some accountability for the advice they receive.

Smaller businesses tend to have more flexible bonus structures than their large counterparts and many are planning on holding back bonus money at least until they get a better understanding of where things are going, Alter says.

I'd go so far as to project that within ten years the amount of money flowing through all crowdfunding platforms will at least equal that of all other funding sources.

Owners that aren't willing to go along with these restrictions are going to find themselves unable to raise money, at least for now.»

Go running (or in my case, biking) around town chasing down investors and startups all at the same time, simultaneously pitching your strategy and executing it, taking money from one hand and putting in the other as you both fundraise and prove out your strategy by deploying capital... and forget having an income for at least a year.

If I was an entrepreneur launching a crowdfunding campaign, I would probably go with IndieGoGo because, if my goal is $ 20,000 and I only raise $ 10,000, at least I'm halfway there and I can try to find other sources of money.

So, for you, what changed from the 2014 post where you «absolutely plan to have PC manage at least $ 100,000 to start this year and go from there» to the 2017 reply of not letting them invest your money?

For example, if you're going to be making Wagyu beef burgers (that you buy at $ 5 per patty from a bulk store), and you plan to have the variable costs run at 50 % of the revenue from the burger, you'll need to sell your burger for at least $ 10 so that you aren't losing money.

So some of this money has been working hard for us for at least that long and can go take a little break, until we decide where to live.

If you don't understand or at least know what a company does and how it makes money, then you will not be able to tell why the stock is going up or down, you will be at the mercy of the stock and this is a fast ticket to losing money.

For instance, no financial expert ever said «go put all your money into Snapchat stock» — at least not to the everyday investor.

At the very least, your IPS will dictate what percentage of your investments will go to globally - diversified stocks, and what percentage of your money will go to United States Treasuries.

In today's «derivative» stage of finance capitalism, large Wall Street banks make money off their customers and counterparties by betting which way the economy will go, much like betting on a horse race — except that «fixing» the financial race is not illegal, or at least is not prosecuted.

Which I am not going to do, because they will give me a bonus then, which gives me the obligation to earn at least 30.000 before I get my money back.

Executive Order 13360 calls for at least 3 percent of all federal agencies» contracting money to go toward businesses owned by these vets.

second interesting fact - at least to me... the money Judas threw back in his guilt, ultimately went to buy a field for the burial of the unknown, strangers.

He at least got the man that Bush couldn't get but yet Bush takes credit for wasting vast amounts of money on a war that should not have gone on as long as it did.

I read a while back that UK Catholics were being asked for donations to finance the trip, so I figured that at least * that * money wouldn't go to the Church as regular «Sunday» donations; but whatever part of it that the UK has to pop for is, I suppose, an issue between the populace and their gov «t.

Furthermore, from a practical standpoint, I'm not going to invest time, energy, and money in God without at least some objective reason to believe he exists.

Hi Ed, The Pastor at the Church of Hosanna International Ministries (HIM), does not get paid he willingly shows his bank statements to the congregation, in hopes that they will understand where the money is really going and with that said he keeps 100 dollars in his account and lives off of that for a whole month and the rest of the tithes and offerings go to 13 different ministries, divided evenly and the Church helps out at least 3 - 4 missionaries and the youth group of the Church all in separate accounts, this is a Church of around 68 to 80 people every Sunday this is not a big Church but God has blessed this man beyond measure and continues to do so this Church can be found in Saint Joseph Missouri, Pastor Larry Gray.

When we pay taxes we at least get a better change of the money going to things we need....

I would not expect the Frenchman to go in hard and offer the full # 79 million that is the value of his release clause, but I would think that he could at least try a big money bid.

The Pats make a trade so they don't have to pay a WR who is up for a contract extension and immediately they want OBJ who is going to demand at least 18 million per year??? More money than they are paying TB12?

They can afford it, sure, but when you consider that at least some of that money will be going to players who aren't worth it (looking at you, 38 - year - old Robinson Cano), it would still be a burden to overcome.

I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.

If we struggle the atmosphere at home is going to be very nasty to say the least — people pay a lot of money to watch Arsenal, they will not be pleased with this..

It is crucial that we don't slip up though and we need at least one of strikers to find his scoring boots and I'm going to put my money on Theo Walcott coming good today, maybe assisted by Olivier Giroud?

If Arsenal really needed the money they would keep him, play him minimum in the Euros, and as a sub, showcase his talents, and his worth would go up at least 10 million.

Wenger will be gone, so why don't you play at least for the money you get?

You know Hafiz you have a strong point there, for a team that's had the same manager for almost 2 decades we should be putting in some world class performances on a regular (putting money aside) we should at least be the masters of tactics since we went through such a financial constraint.

It's better if Arsenal use the money they would have used on Mbappe to strengthen the required positions in our team.That would be the wiser thing to do.Besides it likely Mbappe will stay for at least one season before moving and to me he should.What is Wenger waiting for?Why not just go all out and sign a striker even if that'll be our only signing.Arsene should just sign someone who knows where the net is.I still can't believe wevmissed out on the EPL to Leicester.It was all down to poor finishing.Even if it was meant to be for Leicester there's a reason why everything happens.

i would have thought if we are only getting in c / h wenger will go quite big in who it might be i have got my money on a # 15 million + player, to come in as we will need that price range of quality to come in to compete and maybe displace mert, or at least allow him to rest for a few games we do nt know who wengers talking to in the back ground but i am sure all the scouts have been busy and its just asking clubs for availability after that.

I think you should at least think about the situation before having a go at the boss, and is it our boss who is setting the prices, I don't know but people are too quick to have a go when it comes to money and Arsene.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

I wish fans would appreciate that Elneny at # 5m represents very good value for money.He was bought as a back up player unlike Xhaka and Mustafi who were so called stars costing # 70m who were going to take us to a higher level.If Arsenal were to sell Elneny they would at least double their money whereas we would take a huge hit on Xhaka and Mustafi.In fact I very much doubt it we would recoup 50 % of our outlay.Enemy will never be a great player but he is the type of dependable, hard working standby that every top team needs.Please get off his back.

Looks like Stan likes to kill animals ah wat money does to people they just get bored and cum up with stupid tv prog go kill animals makes me mad and sad and to think our club is ran by this man no wonder we are we're we are besides putting cash into tv, Stan get ur cash and give ozil and Sanchez and ox the money they want if doesn't do it go get bale that's wat real owner does and if Sanchez refuses da offer get the guys killing animals on ur programme to go hunting Sanchez sick being put down like how are spurs ahead of us there building now we're passed that we should be in champions league semis at least I don't no if it's wenger or da owner but at Highbury when mr drink was around we had 13 world class players and Highbury now emirates we have maybe 3 or 4 or 5 tops, world class players and guess wat we can't even keep them oh my dear friends it don't feel rite I find myself losing my arsenal my life I can not believe spurs are above us and how we use tear them to shreds our kids use ta, who cares if Sanchez goes we will not win da league with Stan there he just wants pump cash in to shooting poor animals well to me ur the animal and ur taking a sleeping giant in to the jungle?

If you look at the First Five Years of the last decade Wenger at least managed to qualify for the Champions League in each of those seasons.The Second Five Years have clearly shown we as a Club have gone backwards and spiralling in a downward descent.And in these Five Years we have spent MORE money on transfer fees and player wages than at any time in the Clubs history.

But now either way if this is his last contract then after not having money for so many years now it's available he'll want to go out with a bang and if he wants another contact then I think he'll need to win the league at least in the next couple of seasons.

I don't like the way he took money out last year, but him not interfering with the club isn't really a bad thing, at least he doesn't try and rebrand Arsenal and go against the supporters like owners at some other clubs have done.

1) If we're going to spend top - flight money on No. 2, I'd prefer that player play right away and not sit the bench for 2 years 2) Barkley seems to be more likely to be a potential HOFer than any of the big QBs do, at least according to everything that's been said.

I would REALLY hate to see him playing for City this year, I mean REALLY hate it, but pragmatically if he stays we're missing out on big money that could be used to land 1 - 2 quality players (in theory at least, we same incapable of actually closing deals lately), he's going to wind up at City almost for sure next year, and the likely and eventual clear knowledge of this is going to make it hard for the fans to support him (to put it mildly) and be a major distraction to the team and chemistry.

Players are willing to give up an outside chance at Hollywood money for guaranteed regular - player money, and they're going to keep doing this until the next CBA, at least.

He should spend all the money he has been saving on at least 3 quality players like Monalos, Mkhitaryan and any top quality striker and give the season a go.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

I just can't believe we are going to lose 2 players who, on paper at least, are worth a lot of money go for nothing at the end of the season.

The stance by Arsene is at least a gamble, because keeping players who are disillusioned with the club, or who are mendaciously wanting to stick their snouts deeper into the money trough demanding increases to their already sky high salaries is risky because angry employees, and they are only employees, can not be relied upon when the going gets tough.

Its nice to see some people have open there eyes but all is true lets ask our selves have this team change from last season where are the experienced players that wenger talked about he selling us bull and every season he gets away with it the fans deserve better am from the caribbean so chance r i might never get to see arsenal live at the emirates because its too expensive at least the club should be winning things i know its important to balance the books you must BUT football is about trophies as well and thats were the balance lies how the hell can we go Six (6) seasons yes 6 without a trophy not even a FA cup or carling cup and no one says a word about the manager that is rubbish Arsenal live in the past too much the time is now this season for me is the absolute last for wenger to win something i do nt care how much money he has made the club and Wenger if you cant bring that then go work for an oil company and make them money and leave arsenal to a manager who is willing to win something not only buy players for 10 million who take 10 years to develop am frustrated with this man.