Sentences with phrase «at least should know»

We all know (at least we should know) what MS's shortcomings are.

Everyone knows - or at least should know - that getting behind the wheel carries with it a serious responsibility for your life and the life of anyone else in the vehicle.

While we know — or at least should know by now — that a Clarisonic can help you cleanse your skin up to six times better than hands alone, the Sonic Foundation brush can help you blend your makeup better than if you had just been using your fingers.

The reality is, and you at least should know this so you'll transfer her ASAP if something seems like it's going wrong, that even low risk homebirths can go bad.

Because as we all know, or at least should know, proof texting without proper context is not only pointless, it's dishonest.

Not exact matches

But you should know enough to fix basic problems, or at least guide someone else towards fixing the problem for you.

But low interest rates, at least in Canada, have pushed household debt to such vertiginous levels that officials like Carney know they shouldn't be counting on consumer spending to drive the recovery — ergo, the call for more corporate investment.

Though I was young, I already had seven years of business experience, so I knew that at the very least I should get a second opinion.

Exhibitors should start planning at least half a year in advance while attendees should start coming up with an action plan six weeks in advance, suggests Candace Adams, an event and exhibition management consultant known as «The Booth Mom.»

Dropping «Donuts» from the brand name has been a strategic no - brainer for over a decade, and ideally should have been fully completed at least five years ago.

This isn't to say he needs to start spending half an hour shaving his stubble every morning, but he should at least know how to shave it the right way and with the right tools.

Only 31 percent knew that they should draw down no more than 4 percent of their assets a year in retirement — even though 65 percent expect to live to at least age 80.

At least the initial response should be public, though, to let everyone know that you're on the issue and that you care.

«There's a permaculture principle known as stacking functions, the notion that everything you plant in a garden should serve at least three functions.

«But Ryan's employers are having him there because he's been cleared and you have to remember, Ryan has relationships with a lot of people personally,» he said, pointing to Oscars host Jimmy Kimmel's recent announcement that he will let Seacrest interview him: «Listen, you know, we should at the very least afford people the opportunity for truth, what the facts of the story are before hanging them out to dry,» Kimmel told Variety.

No matter what your personal thoughts are on the subject, it is definitely something that most all men should at least consider from time to time.

This analogy fails because in a casino at least you know the exact odds before you play (or at least you should).

If you know anything about US gun laws, though, this should have at first seemed unlikely — after all, automatic weapons are some of the few guns that are supposed to be banned or, at the very least, strictly regulated in America.

First, there should be at least two individuals involved in the investigation, and optimally, one should not personally know the subject.

I know I said technology shouldn't play a role in shaving, but I am thankful for at least one technological advancement where shaving is concerned — razor blades.

«The bottom line is the evidence indicates that Uber hired Levandowski even though it knew or should have known that he possessed over 14,000 confidential Waymo files likely containing Waymo's intellectual property; that at least some information from those files, if not the files themselves, has seeped into Uber's own LiDAR development efforts; and that at least some of said information likely qualifies for trade secret protection,» U.S. District Judge William Alsup wrote.

The banks should be nationalized, at least temporarily, and every person and institution involved (otherwise known as the elite banksters and politicians who served and supported the government and «quasi» government decisions) in each of the bailouts and heists of the taxpayer's (i.e. the «common» mans) money, should be divested of their personal assets and earnings and put in a stockade for public viewing, smack dab in the middle of Wall Street, to be pelted with rotten vegetables.

You may honestly say that you don't know for sure, but you should have educated yourself enough by now to at least make a guess as to which is more likely:

If you must steal a name you should at least have chosen a less known sport.

Plus, I think she knows she shouldn't run, at least this time.

I don't know how many people here are from Aurora — Co, but some comments are not helping in any way the survivors and families.I respect all religions in the world and I also respect the opinion of those who don't believe in God or anything.But, instead of blasphemy the name of God, send your positive thoughts and energy to those who survived this tragedy.Even though some of you show no signs of good Christians you should show at least signs of good neighbors.You still can be an Atheist and have compassion for others!Don't let the evil be inside you, Aurora — CO needs to heal in peace!!!

I will no longer talk to those who believe that the unity of the church can or should be achieved by rejecting the presence of, or at least at the expense of, gay and lesbian people.

At least one place Lewis explains this problem was in the Screwtape letters, where a demon exclaims, «How much better for us if all humans died in costly nursing homes amid doctors who lie, nurses who lie, friends who lie, as we have trained them, promising life to the dying, encouraging the belief that sickness excuses every indulgence, and even, if our workers know their job, withholding all suggestion of a priest lest it should betray to the sick man his true condition!»

But you should at least be honest and know that one who believes in the forensic science of origins of life has to have as much faith in the person asserting the theory as one has to have believing God was the witness to the event and told man kind how the world came about in simplistic terms.

Knowing that the majority (Christians here in the states) can pull some crazy crap and make policy that by law, they shouldn't be able to is in the back of my mind at least.

He may, of course, have known John Mark, as well as Peter; he may, indeed, have been John Mark; but I should feel much more certain in describing him as a Roman Christian — though possibly not born in Rome — who reflected at an early day the somewhat cold and unimaginative outlook characteristic of at least a major strain in the heritage of that ancient church.

I do not know whether there would be, but at least it seems to me of the greatest importance that people should know, in terms which they can understand, what it is they are being asked to accept or reject.

And those who care about religious liberty should know at least as much about that case, McCullen v. Coakley, as they do about the more narrowly decided case with which the Court ended its term.

We know that religion, at the very least, has been manipulated by man to serve the purpose of man, and should therefore be questioned.

I suppose I should have known what I was letting myself in for, but after about an hour's worth of extremely harrowing film depicting life in Nazi - occupied Poland, I finally cracked at the sight of a soldier pushing an empty pram [and at least it was empty] over the side of a railway platform.

My intentions are not to argue if the bible is true or not, but we should at least be intelligent enough to know when a story is describing an historic event and when it is giving a command!

They should get together and form a committee; you know at least have a unifying message.

I know that you will likely disagree with my interpretation of those texts, but you should at least know that I have not ignored them, and have done my due diligence in studying the text.

The Pope knew, the Cardinals knew, the Bishops knew, or at least they should have known.

I would add, following the example of the best American Catholic «public philosophers» John Courtney Murray and Orestes Brownson, that we should, as loyal Americans [we Porchers and REM fans are all about standing for the place where we live], actually explain why our Fathers built better than they knew — which means criticizing their thinking and affirming [most of] their practice with a theory that at least wasn't completely their own.

You may not believe what it says, but you should at least KNOW what it's saying before you go condemning people.

Shouldn't you know at least the basics of something before you attack it?

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?

Should he not recant his earlier position if he now knows it was wrong or at least inappropriate?

No matter what you think, agree or disagree, Joseph Smith at least claimed to build God's church according God's direction as opposed to others who simply disagreed with their religion and started something according to how they think it should be done.

You should at least know how to be respectable of other peoples belief.

We should be known as people ready to celebrate and party at the least excuse.

At least I know I should be very angry if the Mohammedans tried to prevent the rest of us from drinking wine.

If today some Catholics no longer want to learn from the Church that truth, and hence authentic freedom, too, is involved with society and therefore with institution, they should at least learn it from Marxist anthropology.

I do kinda take issue though with straight people who think gay people should be celibate (or I suppose someone who thinks their choice for celibacy is the only way for everyone — but at least they actually know what they are asking of people).