Sentences with phrase «at least the concept of»

The study posed an interesting question, because the group date seems to be gaining popularity, or at least the concept of it.

Most skeptics understand ghg, and understand at least the concepts of CO2.

Not exact matches

When choosing a business opportunity, keep in mind that if you buy an opportunity from a company with a sizable number of outlets that's been in business for at least three years, you'll pay more for this established concept that you would for a newer one.

As a matter of fact, it could — or at least, it offered up a promising concept (though the details remain proprietary): flat - bottomed resealable bags that hang from a downward - angled rail; remove the first package and the rest slide neatly down.

The Quincy shop is one of at least 30 concept stores that Dunkin' plans on opening in the next year.

Mike Hearn, one of the main developers of the Bitcoin architecture alongside the mysterious Nakamoto, has said that any implementation of the concept is at least a decade away because of the need for hardware upgrades on physical goods.

The SolidEnergy battery formulation also relies on a solid electrolyte, the reactive catalyst in a battery — at least superficially similar to one of the core concepts behind exciting but thus far underperforming battery startup Sakti3.

Who are your future customers — and competitors?While you may not be able to thoroughly test the market potential for your business concept, you should at least understand who your likely customers are and what kind of competition you would face.

I grew up in a house that didn't stock sugared cereal and had at least two different kinds of family recipes for Brussels sprouts, so healthy eating isn't exactly a foreign concept to me, but I've definitely lapsed as a 23 - year old living on my own.

Same thing with stocks, it's a shame they don't force fundamental analysts to at least have the basics of this concept interwoven with their old school discounted cash flow analysis stuff.

«The model of coworking in restaurants is still very new, but we find that most hospitality owners are at least aware of the concept of coworking,» Levy explained.

I was amazed by the concept, however was not sure how can we add additional income, given that most of jobs demand at least 60 hours a week or more.

Just as an example, GRAVITY or at least our system of laws, rules, concepts, and equations explaining it is a THEORY.

At the very least, our country was founded on the concept of God given rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

«Time» is something humans created to quantifying the passing of events, because we need it to understand the world around us (or at least most of us do; there are people with strange mental conditions that are fully functioning but have no concept of time).

In an editorial provocatively titled «Against Human Rights,» he argues that the concept of human rights has become an ideology that functions, at least in the West, as «an enemy of the responsible exercise of freedom,» indeed a «patron of negative freedom, pushing against demands and obligations arising from our shared culture.»

• Kalidasa, Śakuntala (Abhijñānaśākuntalam): As Kalidasa was «Sanskrit's Shakespeare» (though older than the Bard by around a millennium), and as this is his masterpiece, and as it was the German translation of this play that first inspired in Goethe the concept of «world literature,» one really should read it at least once.

I also think that the exhibition (or at least its concept) is worthy of defense.

But it may be even more unnerving for some to find that the concept of a Supreme Being apparently does not play a central role in his religious philosophy, at least not in his ethical teachings.

But we can say at least this: the essential meaning of the concept of the miraculous, as this has been used in traditional theology, is grounded in the keen awareness men have of the unexpected and unprecedented experiences and happenings, the novel and hence the unusually stimulating events or circumstances of life, through which men in every age have been aroused to faith in God and have been given a deepening conviction of his love and care.

When people compare God to an invisible dragon or unicorn, it's annoying (for those of us who see concepts of «God» as being like «Love» or «Art» rather than invisible beareded man), but it at least makes some cultural sense.

The type of god Einstein apparently believed in is at least possible (a god who started the universe and walked away never to be seen or heard from again), however, the Christian concept of a personal god who watches over everyone at the same time is laughable.

But if we can never get a hold of the thing experimentally at all, it is not clear what we mean by it, at least as a concept.

The juxtaposition of these two comments on the threefold character of an actual occasion indicates that Whitehead expressed at least two different conceptions of God in Process and Reality, and at least some of the passages depicting the final concept are insertions.11 It turns out that all of them can be so construed, except for the main text (V.2.3 - 6) which Whitehead reserved for the end.

Yes, glad that you agree with me... at least on the concept of «most» atheists won't even give it a second thought.

I hope, nevertheless, that my comments may indicate why one person at least on this side of the Atlantic (and hence somewhat isolated from the technical expertise, vocabulary, and sometimes apparently frenetic debates of the community of process thinkers) finds in Hartshorne's work «genuine philosophic wisdom,» especially as it develops insights into the logical status and conceptual structure of a theistic understanding of the concept of God.

It would be ill - advised to set much store by such studies, given the difficulty of measuring something like self - concept, but at least they don't raise any alarms.»

Whitehead's clearly Lockean concept of «substance» in Aristotle, besides supposing the mutual isolation of Entities one from another, seems to include at least the following characteristics:

I tried to preserve at least those features by way of the concept of fundamental entity in the latter part of MP.

A naturalistic reinterpretation of Whitehead's scheme has to show (1) that in some one, at least, of these roles the concept «God» violates the fundamental metaphysical principles of the system and thereby introduces incoherence into the scheme, and (2) that the system can be so interpreted and modified that each of these roles is superfluous.

The concept of myth, then, helps us in at least three ways.

But the solution to the problem of whether the preservation of all values is a logical implicate of Whitehead's principles (and whether the idea is empirically valid) is at least partly dependent on the answers that are given to these concepts: (A) «elimination» (which involves «negative prehensions»); (B) «objective immortality»; and (C) the «incompatibility of values.»

The vocation of St. John as the apostle of the Divinity of Christ's one person has fed and powered the true development of the doctrine of the Church at all times, not least in the first centuries in which the true doctrine of both the divinity and the humanity are hammered out in great Councils, and the concepts are refined in the fires of contrary heresy against either the full Divinity or the full Humanity of Christ.

I do too, and what I observed when I participated in such a group was that in fact, these groups are at least as dogmatic as any Christian church is in cramming down the throats of attendees the notion that «God is whoever / whatever you want he / she / it to be», and there can not be any absolute concept of God.

T4 is ruled out by the contention that God is at least possible — he is not impossible, the concept of God is not meaninglessness or contradictory.

On the basis of this insight, one is able to solve (or better, dissolve) the famous paradox of Epimenides the Cretan (who claimed that all Cretans are liars), or at least identify and clarify the nature of the paradox presently silk - screened on numerous APA fund - drive T - shirts, or, most importantly, circumvent Russell's own paradox of the class of all classes that are not members of themselves, a notion that was otherwise crucial to the attempt to demonstrate the foundations in logic of the arithmetic concept of number.

And yet without so thinking of it, we could never know it to be «the model of all experiences» and so the primary analogue of at least some of our psychical concepts.

Hartshorne concludes an account of his panentheistic concept of God by asking explicitly, «What, in the foregoing account, is literal, and what is metaphorical, or at least, analogical?»

For all we could possibly know, all our psychical concepts apply to God not as analogies, but as symbols, in exactly the same way in which at least some of them clearly must apply if we are to do any justice at all to the faith and witness of theistic religion.

If any of our psychical concepts really is a true analogy, in that it applies primarily to God and only secondarily to ourselves, at least with respect to what is meant by it, if not with respect to how it means, we, at any rate, neither are nor ever could be in the position of knowing it to be so.

The loose use of the concept of «chance», which has plagued so much of the debate between science and religion, seems to be in some way related to at least two issues.

Maybe we need (this is very tentative) to alert ourselves more than we do to the tragic elements lying just beneath the surface of the parabolic, and even to receive what is offered to us as tragedy as parable, at least in an extended use of that already comprehensive concept.

The meaning of the concept of messiahship as applied to Jesus must occupy us, at least briefly, later in this discussion.

I enjoy your openness and willingness to post a «theological concept» that is still in development... but I have to admit, it seems like you're trying a little too hard here... I» v read one of your more recent posts and realize that you have to set this aside for a while (at least on your blog).

Some of these pertain, Ford writes, to Whitehead's concept of God, showing that Whitehead experimented, at different points in the text of that work, with at least three distinct notions of God: (a) as wholly nontemporal and nonconcrescent; (b) as nontemporal and concrescent; and the view that we take as canonical, of God as (c) both temporal and concrescent.5

I've found it interesting that many of those same atheists raise their children with the concept that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Toooth Fairy also exist., at least for a portion of their children's lives.

It is a broad concept that includes, in some sense at least, the other divisions of theology as well.

However, to my mind, any concept of a limited deity finally entails a denial of the capacity of God to redeem the world and thus, ironically, raises the question of whether God is in the last analysis even love, at least love in the Christian sense of the term.

It would seem to me that Altizer's position is perilously close to being the equivalent of the latter, at least in his concept of origin, of the Incarnation and the apocalypse.

His survey of the social science literature on the topic usefully, if sometimes turgidly, compiles the growing evidence that homeschooled children learn more than their counterparts, at least to the extent that standardized tests measure learning, and are emotionally healthier as well, at least to the extent that psychologists» «self - esteem and self - concept» scales truly capture emotional health.