Sentences with phrase «at least the questions point»

Tough questions for anyone to answer, but at least the questions point us in the correct direction.

Not exact matches

How to Manage Interns: Providing Mentorship and Advice Even if you have a hands off management style, when you bring on interns, you have to make sure that they have at least one point person, if not more, that they can go to with their questions.

But the question, at least from Zuckerberg's point of view, seems increasingly meaningless.

«The question from a financial stability point of view is whether or not those measures, to the extent they encourage more credit and more investment, may not buy some more growth today, but increase the risk of some disruption in growth further down the road,» Carolyn Wilkins, the Bank of Canada's senior deputy governor, said at least week's press conference.

White is pointing to certain questions that financial professionals are asking, such as: Does having a net worth of at least $ 1 million or individual income of at least $ 200K necessarily mean you are a «sophisticated» investor, especially if you've never invested before?

If there was a question about it, you'd think that at least one of the scores of scholars and theologians that worked on the project for 20 years would have pointed out the inaccuracy before it was edited and printed — especially considering that not all the participants are Catholic.

What would be shocking however is if this alien race had an incredibly similar story to that found in the bible complete with a single god, a jesus, some miracles, some parables, etc.... It would be the similarity of religions between alien races in this hypothetical that would truely shock me and at least make me question if that would be a solid point of evidence for the religious.

While I can not myself question Julie based on my knowledge, I think it is fair to at least point out that there is legal documentation and testimony to support that Julie's side is not the only side of the story.

will have to be assumed and telescoped; but I will concentrate on what I think are critical questions — critical in the sense that they represent, at least in my opinion, points on which greater clarity is required if the community of Christ's discipleship is to move into the post-Christendom future with something like apostolic confidence.

That, at least, is the jumping off point for a very intense questioning of the role of the Cross in Christianity that takes place in the Fall issue of Tikkun magazine, which should be received at your home this week if you are a suscriber (and if not, you could subscribe now on line at http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/purchase-or-renew-a-subscription-to-tikkun).

This feeling was shared by many who pointed out flaws in Dawkins» arguments or, at the very least, questioned the certainty the scientist holds that all religion is a load of rubbish.

But the question of whether that imposition is soft or hard is an important one; at least some commentators, particularly on the left, will not tire of pointing out the potentialities, in Christianity, particularly, for a sacred order that imposes commanding truths against certain aspects of the traditional family.

And yes, you're talking about a single event that happened thousands of years ago on a single day And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true, but who is the everyone you were referring to?

-- «And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true...»

Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»

Our discussion will be guided by the following question: If Jesus Christ overcomes the distortions of sin, at least to the point that reason can acknowledge the grace and providence of God, is it then possible to move beyond the confines of the circle of faith for further witness to and verification of the faith?

For this reader at least, the literary and rhetorical difficulty for such a book consists in locating within a single frame of discourse the respective partners in the changing relationship, and this difficulty itself points to the theological and ecclesiological problem that the authors rightly sense underlies their title question: «Is the Reformation Over?»

Indeed, it happens so often that it raises serious questions about the other approaches, at least insofar as they try to proceed — ever so carefully and judiciously, they suppose — without this central point up front.

And Jesus gave expression to this devaluation in his own life: he broke the Sabbath when he felt that God bade him act; he excused his disciples (at least) from the custom of fasting; and the burning national question whether one had really to pay the poli tax to the foreign power of occupation (in Judea and Samaria) he answered in the affirmative, but he viewed it as a secular concern and pointed his questioners to the essential duty, «Give to God what belongs to him.»

no question Cook is a more well rounded player to Nick Young, perhaps there is no future for Nick Young on the team, but his 3 point shooting is still valuable, or at least being a viable 3 point shooter threat will space the floor to the benefit of the other team members.

Now maybe I'm just looking at it from the perspective of someone who is interested in this type of thing, but I can't for the life of me see a position where anyone can hear that the president of Chechnya wants to pay you a bunch of money to fly over and do promotion work, and you don't question that at least to the point where you spend absolute maximum 2 minutes looking him up.

It's pretty clear at this point that it's going to be tough to get anyone from the Patriots to answer any more questions about the scandal or its investigation, at least in the media.

winning to Man City is seen by some as a prowess and the resurgence of WENGERS glory days, well I don't see it that way, some see it as an outstanding victory first because we were not beaten merciless and then we scratched a win to a Man City that btw is not at it's best... we had an awful game yesterday, yes we got the points but unconvincing to say the least... WENGER is willing to change!!!!!!??? YES only when pressure mounted and for the first time his job was questioned, why did not happen before, we all know that the stubborn deluded man would have change nothing on his own accord if it wasn't because he was against the ropes....

I feel that in answering a difficult question, there's usually at least one pause point.

The complaint heard on the doorstep which the BT campaign broadcast at least tried to represent — is that the electorate want clarity on the questions that really matter to them, not political point scoring and soundbites.

Because, as your own subsequent question points out, China is (or, at least, in 1950s, was) a more acceptable superpower, unlike Russia; or for that matter a lot further from becoming a superpower, acceptable or not.

The hysterical language being used (not least by those who like to think of themselves as moderates) opens Labour up to the charge of being self - obsessed at a point where the public expect politicians to be confronting profoundly complex security questions.

Fallout from the discovery of the toxic chemical in the water supply of Hoosick Falls later erupted into a war of finger - pointing between local, state and federal agencies after questions emerged in late 2015 about why it took at least 14 months before residents were warned to stop drinking from the village's contaminated wells.

The DNA data suggest not one but at least two instances of interbreeding between archaic and modern humans, raising the question of whether Homo sapiens at that point was a distinct species (see sidebar).

Point: we need to be questioning our habitual daily life more than we do — most of us at least.

I will be reading all of them (up to the point, at least, that they degenerate into arguments between two or three particularly vociferous and contentious individuals), but I will be responding only to those that raise particularly interesting questions or issues, or point out any bone - head mistakes I may have made that need to be fixed.

But it also pointed the way forward for Marvel, which was going to start seriously questioning its heroes» plans and power — at least until the third act, when everything would turn into yet another battle between good and evil.

The pointed but unproductive questioning continued with DeVos pointing out at least three times that Milwaukee has 28,000 kids in voucher programs.

«More questions than answers remain at this point, not the least of which include who will be part of the planning team, how the new system will be designed, and what will happen to the collective bargaining rights of employees of the Detroit Public Schools and the Education Achievement System,» DPS union leaders wrote in a joint statement.

I certainly feel much more knowledgeable about the genre and best practices after reading the book... at least enough to understand their questions and to point them in the right direction with Stahle's guidance.

Your aim is having at least one question that the reader wants the answer for at every point in the story.

There are at least four points (along with a fifth one regarding the new Kindle Touch 3G) at question in this case, including:

So my question would be, «Do you really think it's a bad idea to not have at least a few percentage points in the 2nd largest world economy, particularly at historically low prices?»

Although a verbal description of temperament can't replace meeting the dogs, you may at least get a chance to ask some pointed questions and form an impression from the answers.

So if you're collecting points at 1x via manufactured spend and those points aren't worth at least 2 cents each, it'd probably be worthwhile to question exactly what you're doing and whether you should adjust your plan.

As you can see, even on the low end, if you don't already have the above cards, you'd be giving up at least 340,000 in miles and points, so for anyone who has very limited spend, there's no question that it's not worth putting $ 20,000 on the British Airways Visa to get the other 50,000 points, due to the high opportunity cost.

It's still holding essential metrics, however, but at least the FCC filing in question has now pointed to lesser - discussed details about the system.

Her pieces pose the question, «how little is enough» and in doing so, find the point at which the most is given to the viewer with the least visual and physical information.

I question one point in your last post: «If we know relatively less about the situation, it is at least possibly true that the outcome «nothing of any serious consequence happens» may be relatively more plausible.

At the very least, I open it up to questions that the participants may have at this poinAt the very least, I open it up to questions that the participants may have at this poinat this point.

Now I'll ask you a question: if one climate scientist, Curry, dismisses another climate scientist's, Risbey's, publication as nonsense should she not at least provide a refuation of it rather than merely pointing to the blogs of a couple of non-scientists like Montford and Lewis?

Do you simply agree with it all, and if not, why don't you question it and point out the idiocy at least as much as you question proper science?

In other words, know what you want to say, and then cover at least the key points whether or not you are interrupted with questions.

It is important to note the fees in question were as existed under a version of the Supreme Court Rules that was repealed and replaced in 2009; hearing fees continue to exist (at least to the point of yesterday's ruling) but are reduced.

It does, though, make a few points worth noting and also raises one question (at least for me).