Sentences with phrase «at least they should see»

Within that range, content should simply not be shown to anyone whose personal controls suggest they would not want to see it, or at least they should see a warning first.

Well, maybe not the most exciting matchup but at least we should see some points on the board right?

At least we should see Death Stranding and Tsushima gameplay as well as an extensive TLoU 2 demo.

Not exact matches

You should compare statements from at least two years to see the direction in which the company is moving: Is it on an upswing or a downswing?

For everyone else, I would say that at the very least you should consult an accountant to see if you're missing something.

But he cautions that you should try to stay in a position for at least «a year or two» to see if you can improve your situation.

They «should probably find other — at least see if there are other options for them.»

But since college should be seen as an investment, why not at least evaluate the return on that investment?

Clients may not provide specific analytics, Fox says, but they should be able to at least tell you if they saw a positive impact on their search ranking, especially in conversions and in gaining an audience, as a direct result of the consultant's efforts.

With the oil and natural gas markets stabilized, at least for now, investors should begin considering which companies could emerge from the rubble of the oil price collapse to see their stock prices double or triple in the next few years.

We've seen a lot of evidence about what's coming, through the HomePod firmware leak, and reports including one from Bloomberg this week that outlines exactly how the iPhone interface will work without a home button, but Apple should still have plenty to reveal that we haven't seen at this event, including at least a few amazing ARKit demos.

The company also offered strong guidance that should see earnings per share grow by at least 9 % in 2018.

But since certain parts of the submitted responses will be publicized, it should provide at least some useful information for Bitcoin investors to see how exactly these exchanges operate.

Shouldn't Christianity, then, at least not contradict tools (as they are only tools for use as we see fit) that help us improve our lives and become better people.

At least they should be reexamined, to see whether our assumptions fit the facts.

I'm posting this because it should make sense to a person with at least half a brain... Oh, wait, I see you are from Texas, never mind then...

In other words, the quote is being used within the context of a theological position and it means what they assert it to mean (or don't even bother to assert, but merely assume we should see) at least partially because of their presuppositions with which they come to the text.

For if, along with Teilhard, we see evolution as «primarily psychical transformation» (that is, evolution as the rise of consciousness), then, at least, it should not be too hard to suppose that religious belief could be part of the psychical process, as the next dimension of the evolution of rational consciousness.

If that is the case, then there is a perfectly good reason why the cause is lost, which means there's something you didn't see, which means you should stop praying, or at least change your prayer.

At least, they say, they should be seen as significant «myths» rather than as having factual content.

According to a 1994 essay in the New York Review of Books by John Maynard Smith, the dean of British neo-Darwinists, «the evolutionary biologists with whom I have discussed his [Gould's] work tend to see him as a man whose ideas are so confused as to be hardly worth bothering with, but as one who should not be publicly criticized because he is at least on our side against the creationists.

The point is obvious, and it's been said before, but to see it in this high production value should make you at least be happy that the point is also going mainstream.2.

If you might have one of these wackos running the country, you should at least take the time to see what rediculous crap he believes in and practices1!!

The cross is certainly a many - sided event and symbol, and contexts alter meanings; but in our context at least, I believe, it should be seen primarily, not as a divinely managed human sacrifice to a righteously wrathful God but as God's own solidarity with the creature and the decisive statement of One who would be «with us» unreservedly.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

At least he is indifferent to it, as when he writes that what should disturb his critics is «that philosophy all by itself already sees what the New Testament says.

If one wants to see for himself how truly great the Old Testament is, he should read in their context at least the passages to which references have been made.

Every community should create a network of low - cost groups for at least four types of couples: pre-marrieds (see Chapter 6) early, middle, and older marrieds.

And I'm not attacking Darwin — but social Darwinianism which was an aberration that we should all lament — and still has sway today in how we see the least of the least in, at least, North American Society.

Speaking of watching, you should read this article about Buzzfeed's Tasty if you are at all interested in the future of the online food community and / or have ever watched one of their ubiquitous videos (I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that you have probably seen at least one).

If you didn't try by now you should definitely try at least once to see how delicious it is.

It should keep at least a week, and I don't see any reason you couldn't freeze any leftovers.

i would love to see where you found that information, from what i see on mercola, nutiva and tropical traditions, etc. coconut oil should last at least 18 months and others suggest up to seven years with no sign of rancidity....

I was flicking through my news feeds on Flipboard the other day (Flipboard for iOS is where I find the news I'm interested in rather than that which some newspaper editor of radio or TV producer thinks I should read, see or hear — I haven't bought a newspaper for at least ten years and am all the better and more diversely informed for that).

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

What's this i see here.This site is also in a crisis and that is understating the qualities of our players.I for one will take Walcott over Pedro and i am just responding to a question.I just do nt get it.To me Walcott really is that good and we need him inform.Injuries have hampered his progress a lot as a player but at least i am happy with him.I do not even get why peeps criticize him so badly.To me he should be our starting right winger.We need him because he is a game changer.I just do nt get how he is on the bench.Peeps are so ignorant and will gather whatever facts they can to make him seem average.Talk about the certain 3 musketeers in arsenal lineup but not him.He is a very dangerous player

But at least in the short term, we should have seen this shift coming.

He should see three to four targets and might make one to two catches, so he should at least produce a few points.

At least one of those officials should be seeing that O'Shea's flicking the ball on, so it can't be offside and it should have been a penalty,» he continued.

But at least any hint of academic violations should not affect Wiley's qualifications for her current job, which is — let's see here... ah, yes.

On evidence so far this team still needs at least 2 defenders, i think Mert will soon be feeling the affects of last season too, in this season and if we not getting a DM, Callum Chambers should be moved to that position allowing us to become more mobile (from what i have seen of him in defense i think he would even be more impressive in DM).

In such a competitive limbo, it is encouraging to see a club recognise, or at least pretend to recognise, that the people buying the tickets should be able to do so in the knowledge that, if things go well, they might just end up enjoying themselves.

Xhaka does not deserve to be in the lineup more than anyone.As bad as Ozil is at least awe can say form is temporary class is permanent though he also does not deserve to start.Why is Coquelin not playing instead of Xhaka?Even Elneny is a better buy than Xkaka.I don't care what kind of performance Xhaka has today.Why should a player be allowed to go off form and still be in the starting eleven while other players should be taking his place?Poor management from.Wenger.It's not fair at all.Mark my words that Xhaka won't last in the lineup when Wenger is gone and I can see some youngsters like Maitland - Niles and Kelechi Nwakali surpassing him in the future.The guy can't defend to even save his own life.

At least you 2 know who I'm talking about 3 points what you got to say about that nothing cause we got the maximum points we can and we played quite well if you do watch football you should know every team with a 1 goal lead will be on the back foot to try see out the game especially wen we had plenty of chances to finish them off COYG

something new for sure will happen at the very least we will be getting new players the question being who...... a striker with 30 goals abomyang a central defender a midfielder new maneger who diago simone will do well with atlatico or lazio he is connected to them arsenal needs some one within its ranks some one connected to them But today we seen an ugly encounter were certain players should have had the red i think technology should come in to it and players should be disciplined after The premier league is a physical strong competition to win it you got to be very strong very accurate and very demanding and if you do not have the team to do it you do not win our team didn't live to exceptions of last season so there for changes will have to happen

Their 1st goal was frustrating to see ox walking into the box while the guy he should have been tighter on got in for a free header, yes Theo could have done better on the other side to block the cross but at least Theo ran to try while the Ox just lazily walked into the box and not done anything to help defend the cross in.

i think his an amazing player not many like him in the EPL and to reduce injury risk we should use him sparingly at least until January, for now use him for 65/70 mnt or sometimes bring him on as sub and lets see what happens

Our backups should be hungry and wanting to break through, and I'd like to see at least some of Ospina, Holding, Gabriel, Gibbs, Elneny, Lucas Perez, Ox, perhaps Reine - Adelaide play tonight.

We need to change some players, even if they are good players to make our game more dinamic, more complete.If Walcott will leave, definetly Sterling is the right choose to play with Sanchez.If Bayern will want Ozil, I think we should let him go.I think mutch people will be not agree with this, Ozil is a great player BUT is not a complete player, doesn't have enough speed and is seems sometimes like he is not involved in the game.I think a switch with Gotze can be benefic for our team, he run alot, is creative and make the defensive as well.We need a Striker to, but a good one, someone like Benzema or Cavani, someome who can get at least 20 goals per season.A new DM is what we need for balance the game, I think Vidal is the best in the world in this moment (is just my opinion), he working hard in defence and can win a game with a long shot.This is the way I see footbal.

Archie Manning should keep New Orleans competitive at least part of the time, though what the Saints can do about their kittenish pass rush remains to be seen.